Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Axiomathes

The EPR-Experiment and Free Process Theory

Wim Christiaens

Published Dec 5, 2003• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/b:axio.0000006796.36127.10

Related papers

The EPR-Experiment and Free Process Theory

Wim Christiaens

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•1 citation

Free will in the framework of elementary process theory

Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Experimental Test of the Free Will Theorem (Russian Version)

Bi‐Heng Liu, Xiao‐Min Hu, Jiangshan Chen +2 more

Here we present an experiment which, firstly, demonstrates single-particle contextuality on the particles in one laboratory. Then, since our particles have been previously entangled with other particles in a distant laboratory, we can also reveal the EPR correlations between both laboratories. Interestingly, even though the correlations in the first laboratory can be explained by LHV theories, and the EPR correlations between the two laboratories can be explained by LHV theories, we show that there is no LHV theory explaining both of them. Our experiment is a test of the free will theorem since it implements the conditions under which axiom (i) applies, then checks axioms (ii) and (iii), and finally reveals an extreme violation of the predictions of theories in which elementary particles have no free will.

•Jul 1, 2018•0 citations

An experimental test of the EPR paradox

Giuseppe Faraci, D. Gutkowski, S. Notarrigo +1 more

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Apr 1, 1974•88 citations

EPR-Experiment Explanation

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Dynamical state reduction in an EPR experiment

Daniel Bedingham

A model is developed to describe state reduction in an EPR experiment as a continuous, relativistically invariant, dynamical process. The system under consideration consists of two entangled isospin particles each of which undergoes isospin measurements at spacelike separated locations. The equations of motion take the form of stochastic differential equations. These equations are solved explicitly in terms of random variables with a priori known probability distribution in the physical probability measure. In the course of solving these equations a correspondence is made between the state reduction process and the problem of classical nonlinear filtering. It is shown that the solution is covariant, violates Bell inequalities and does not permit superluminal signalling. It is demonstrated that the model is not governed by the free will theorem and it is argued that the claims of Conway and Kochen, that there can be no relativistic theory providing a mechanism for state reduction, are false.

arXiv:0907.2327•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 22, 2009•15 citations
Here we present an experiment which, firstly, demonstrates single-particle contextuality on the particles in one laboratory. Then, since our particles have been previously entangled with other particles in a distant laboratory, we can also reveal the EPR correlations between both laboratories. Interestingly, even though the correlations in the first laboratory can be explained by LHV theories, and the EPR correlations between the two laboratories can be explained by LHV theories, we show that there is no LHV theory explaining both of them. Our experiment is a test of the free will theorem since it implements the conditions under which axiom (i) applies, then checks axioms (ii) and (iii), and finally reveals an extreme violation of the predictions of theories in which elementary particles have no free will.
A model is developed to describe state reduction in an EPR experiment as a continuous, relativistically invariant, dynamical process. The system under consideration consists of two entangled isospin particles each of which undergoes isospin measurements at spacelike separated locations. The equations of motion take the form of stochastic differential equations. These equations are solved explicitly in terms of random variables with a priori known probability distribution in the physical probability measure. In the course of solving these equations a correspondence is made between the state reduction process and the problem of classical nonlinear filtering. It is shown that the solution is covariant, violates Bell inequalities and does not permit superluminal signalling. It is demonstrated that the model is not governed by the free will theorem and it is argued that the claims of Conway and Kochen, that there can be no relativistic theory providing a mechanism for state reduction, are false.