Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento

An experimental test of the EPR paradox

Giuseppe Faraci, D. Gutkowski, S. Notarrigo, A. Pennisi

Published Apr 1, 1974• 88 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02763124

Related papers

Experimental criteria for steering and the EPR paradox

Eric G. Cavalcanti, S. J. Jones, Howard M. Wiseman +1 more

•Jul 6, 2009•4 citations

Search for New Tests of the EPR Paradox from Elementary Particle Physics

Dipankar Home

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Comment on `Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?'

Roland Onmès

European Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

The EPR paradox revisited

Cyrus D. Cantrell, Marlan O. Scully

Physics Reports•Jul 1, 1978•45 citations

Experimental Test of the EPR Paradox and its Corresponding Steering Inequality

Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng +4 more

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is one of the earliest paradoxes, arising from the lack of local realistic description of mechanics. The EPR paradox leads to the important concept of quantum which manifests itself by three different phenomena: entanglement, steering, and Bell's nonlocality. Two well-known paradoxes related to Bell's nonlocality, i.e. the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradox and the Hardy paradox, have been widely studied and also experimentally confirmed. However, an experimental test of the EPR paradox is still lacking. The EPR paradox is essentially a steering paradox, and recently it has been mathematically formulated as a contradiction equality $k=1$, thus making it amenable to an experimental verification. Moreover, based on the EPR paradox we also derive a generalized linear steering inequality. In this work, we perform the first experimental test of the EPR paradox in a two-qubit scenario, and also verify the corresponding generalized steering inequality, which has an advantage over the usual one by detecting more steerability of states. Experimental results confirm the theoretical predictions within the experimental errors, and provide a deeper understanding of foundation.

•Apr 9, 2020•0 citations

Macroscopic EPR paradoxes

M. D. Reid, Eric G. Cavalcanti

We propose to test the inconsistency of local reality with quantum mechanics progressively, by defining the S-scopic EPR paradox, that would ultimately allow test of the EPR paradox for the macroscopically entangled "Schrodinger cat" state. Practical signatures of the S-scopic EPR-entanglement are presented for several experimental prototypes.

OSA Workshop on Entanglement and Quantum Decoherence•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is one of the earliest paradoxes, arising from the lack of local realistic description of mechanics. The EPR paradox leads to the important concept of quantum which manifests itself by three different phenomena: entanglement, steering, and Bell's nonlocality. Two well-known paradoxes related to Bell's nonlocality, i.e. the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradox and the Hardy paradox, have been widely studied and also experimentally confirmed. However, an experimental test of the EPR paradox is still lacking. The EPR paradox is essentially a steering paradox, and recently it has been mathematically formulated as a contradiction equality k=1k=1k=1, thus making it amenable to an experimental verification. Moreover, based on the EPR paradox we also derive a generalized linear steering inequality. In this work, we perform the first experimental test of the EPR paradox in a two-qubit scenario, and also verify the corresponding generalized steering inequality, which has an advantage over the usual one by detecting more steerability of states. Experimental results confirm the theoretical predictions within the experimental errors, and provide a deeper understanding of foundation.