Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics World

Deep thought

David Fisk

Published Aug 1, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In response to Kate Gardner’s review “Gedanken fictions” (July pp44–45) of the book Thought X , wherein fiction authors, philosophers and scientists write about “thought experiments”.
DOI
10.1088/2058-7058/30/8/31

Related papers

3. Derrida and the Quantum Brain

Advances in consciousness research•Apr 28, 2003•0 citations

Philosophical background

E.J Squires

A spirited and provocative defence of realism, Is realism a dirty word?, is given by Gardner (1989); more serious readers might prefer that given in the book Computational Philosophy of Science (Thagard, 1988). Unfortunately neither of these authors give sufficient attention to the real problems presented by quantum theory. For this one should consult the detailed discussion of d'Espagnat (1989) in Reality and the Physicist.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

What is ‘real’: A brief comparison

Karl David Stephan

Steven French’s review of Bernard d’Espagnat’s 500-page tome On Physics and Philosophy (Physics Today, Physics Today 0031-9228 60 6 2007 66 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2754610. June 2007, page 66 ) got my attention, with its repeated discussion of something d’Espagnat calls “the Real.” I must confess I have not seen d’Espagnat’s book, but the more I read about this Real in French’s review, the more I thought I’d heard of it somewhere before. In the true scientific spirit of bringing to the attention of a researcher the results of prior research bearing on his work, I have interspersed citations from the Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas (1225–74) between passages from French’s review of d’Espagnat’s book.French states that the Real “nevertheless exerts an influence on the phenomena.”Aquinas wrote, “As there can be nothing which is not created by God, so there can be nothing which is not subject to His government” (part 1, question 103, article 5).French writes, “The grand laws of physics are ‘highly distorted reflections … of the great structures of “the Real”’ (page 455)…. The Real, although impossible to conceive, is nonseparable; from it, both consciousness and empirical reality ‘co-emerge.’”Aquinas wrote, “From the knowledge of sensible things the whole power of God cannot be known; nor therefore can His essence be seen. But because they are His effects and depend on their cause, we can be led from them so far as to know of God whether He exists, and to know of Him what must necessarily belong to Him, as the first cause of all things, exceeding all things caused by Him” (part 1, question 12, article 12).Aquinas maintained that there cannot ultimately be any disagreement between faith and reason because both come from an infinitely faithful and infinitely reasonable God. It is amusing that an apparently secular philosopher such as d’Espagnat, writing for a modern audience of physicists and philosophers and basing his thought on the latest results of quantum mechanics, has nevertheless arrived at conclusions in harmony with the greatest philosopher of the Middle Ages.© 2008 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Jun 1, 2008•0 citations

Beyond the Edge of Certainty, Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy

J. P. Phillips

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1965•70 citations

Thought experiments made real

Fernando Martı́n

Nature Photonics•Feb 1, 2015•5 citations

Entangled test

Thomas D. Angelidis

In his review of Amir Aczel's new book (May p48),Anton Zeilinger admirably sums up the story of entanglement by stating that "this field of research...came into being through the raising of 'mere' philosophical questions" and that "such questions can lead to truly novel and interesting developments – particularly if answering these questions can be brought out of the realm of Gedanken experiments and into the real physics laboratory".

Physics World•Jul 1, 2003•0 citations
Steven French’s review of Bernard d’Espagnat’s 500-page tome On Physics and Philosophy (Physics Today, Physics Today 0031-9228 60 6 2007 66 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2754610. June 2007, page 66 ) got my attention, with its repeated discussion of something d’Espagnat calls “the Real.” I must confess I have not seen d’Espagnat’s book, but the more I read about this Real in French’s review, the more I thought I’d heard of it somewhere before. In the true scientific spirit of bringing to the attention of a researcher the results of prior research bearing on his work, I have interspersed citations from the Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas (1225–74) between passages from French’s review of d’Espagnat’s book.French states that the Real “nevertheless exerts an influence on the phenomena.”Aquinas wrote, “As there can be nothing which is not created by God, so there can be nothing which is not subject to His government” (part 1, question 103, article 5).French writes, “The grand laws of physics are ‘highly distorted reflections … of the great structures of “the Real”’ (page 455)…. The Real, although impossible to conceive, is nonseparable; from it, both consciousness and empirical reality ‘co-emerge.’”Aquinas wrote, “From the knowledge of sensible things the whole power of God cannot be known; nor therefore can His essence be seen. But because they are His effects and depend on their cause, we can be led from them so far as to know of God whether He exists, and to know of Him what must necessarily belong to Him, as the first cause of all things, exceeding all things caused by Him” (part 1, question 12, article 12).Aquinas maintained that there cannot ultimately be any disagreement between faith and reason because both come from an infinitely faithful and infinitely reasonable God. It is amusing that an apparently secular philosopher such as d’Espagnat, writing for a modern audience of physicists and philosophers and basing his thought on the latest results of quantum mechanics, has nevertheless arrived at conclusions in harmony with the greatest philosopher of the Middle Ages.© 2008 American Institute of Physics.