In this chapter we shall consider one of the most difficult problems of quantum mechanics, that is, how it is possible that we have a dynamics ruled by a reversible equation but we obtain random irreversible events when measuring. Many different interpretations have been provided for solving this puzzle. We will discuss some of them by starting with the von Neumann’s projection postulate, one of the first attempts to address the measurement problem and its implications. The role played by the environment in the concept of measurement is then emphasized. We shall also introduce entropy as a measure of the average information content. Finally, the famous Schro¨dinger’s cat paradox will be examined.
In this chapter we shall consider one of the most difficult problems of quantum mechanics, that is, how it is possible that we have a dynamics ruled by a reversible equation but we obtain random irreversible events when measuring. Many different interpretations have been provided for solving this puzzle. We will discuss some of them by starting with the von Neumann’s projection postulate, one of the first attempts to address the measurement problem and its implications. The role played by the environment in the concept of measurement is then emphasized. We shall also introduce entropy as a measure of the average information content. Finally, the famous Schro¨dinger’s cat paradox will be examined.
Quantum mechanics famously posits two distinct evolution rules for the state of a system: a deterministic, unitary time evolution under the Schr¨odinger equation, and a probabilistic “collapse” of the wavefunction upon measurement as dictated by the Born rule. The apparent inconsistency of these two dynamical laws – one continuous and one discontinuous – constitutes the quantum measurement problem. This foundational problem, which underlies the emergence of definite outcomes from quantum superpositions, has persisted since the theory’s inception. In this review, we present a comprehensive and rigorous examination of the measurement problem and survey the leading approaches that seek to resolve or circumvent it. We begin by formulating the measurement problem and its conceptual challenges. We then discuss in detail the major interpretations of quantum mechanics and theoretical frameworks addressing the problem: the Copenhagen interpretation, Everett’s many-worlds interpretation, de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory, objective collapse models, the role of decoherence and environment-induced superselection, and epistemic approaches such as QBism. For each interpretation, we describe the core principles and mathematical formalism, assessing how (and whether) it attempts to solve the measurement problem. We also review modern developments and experiments relevant to quantum measurements, including tests of Bell inequalities, observations of decoherence and macroscopic superpositions, weak measurements and quantum eraser experiments, and thought experiments ‘a la Wigner’s friend. We highlight how these results inform the ongoing debate. Finally, we discuss open problems and challenges that remain in fully resolving the measurement problem.
The theoretical description of measurement in quantum mechanics is one of the most controversial topics in physics. It is deeply entrenched in the interpretations of quantum mechanics and combines both physics and philosophy into the discussion. Often it is described as the measurement problem because of some issues associated with the theory of measurement introduced by John von Neumann in 1932, related to the fact that the Born projection postulate is not unitary and so is not described by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We discuss that theory later in this chapter, but we start from a simpler approach focused on what is actually being done in most single-quantum experiments. Along the way, we encounter a number of counterintuitive and subtle issues, before we explain why we refuse to tackle the measurement problem itself. Specific experiments that we discuss in detail include how we can measure individual quanta and how we can manipulate entanglement and perform delayed choice experiments, quantum beats, atom interferometry, and quantum non-demolition experiments in cavity QED.
This chapter presents the measurement problem from the point of view of the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. Everything physicists measure is measured in a thermal environment, for which statistical thermodynamics is relevant. The thermal interpretation agrees with how one interprets measurements in thermodynamics, the macroscopic part of quantum physics, derived via statistical mechanics. By its very construction, the thermal interpretation naturally matches the classical properties of our quantum world: The thermal interpretation assigns states-and a realistic interpretation for them-to individual quantum systems, in a way that large quantum systems are naturally described by classical observables. Since measurement devices are large quantum systems, this is the key to solving the measurement problem. We discuss the role played by macroscopic systems and the weak law of large numbers in getting readings with small uncertainty. Since quantum physics makes many deterministic predictions, for example regarding observed spectra, but also assertions about probabilities, we distinguish deterministic and statistical measurements. To clarify the meaning of the concept of measurement, we postulate (in Section 11.1) a measurement principle that defines what it means in the thermal interpretation to measure a quantity with a specified uncertainty. This turns the measurement problem from a philosophical riddle into a scientific problem in the domain of quantum statistical mechanics, namely how the quantum dynamics correlates macroscopic readings from an instrument with properties of the state of a measured microscopic system. The essence of scientific practice is the reproducibility of measurements, discussed in Section 11.2. Unlike in traditional interpretations, single, nonreproducible observations do not count as measurements, since this would violate the reproducibility of measurements-the essence of scientific practice. As a consequence, the measurement of a Hermitian quantity A is regarded as giving an uncertain value approximating the q-expectation {A} rather than (as tradition wanted to have it) as an exact revelation of an eigenvalue of A. This difference is most conspicuous in the interpretation of single discrete microscopic events. Except in very special circumstances, these are not reproducible. Thus, they have no scientific value in themselves and do not constitute measurement results. Scientific value is, however, in ensembles of such observations, which result in approximate measurements of q-probabilities and q-expectations. Sections 11.3 and 11.4 distinguish deterministic and statistical measurements, depending on whether a single observation is reproducible, and discuss the role played by macroscopic systems and the weak law of large numbers in getting readings with small uncertainty. How to measure the q-probabilities of events, described in terms of POVMs, is discussed in Section 11.5. Section 11.6 poses the measurement problem as a problem of the statistical mechanics of measurement devices, and discuss recent work by Allahverdyan, Balian, and Nieuwenhuizen on its resolution. Section 11.7 discusses the problem how, in the thermal interpretation, discrete events can arise, although qexpectations are by their very nature continuous. This is resolved by pointing to work by Breuer and Petruccione on piecewise deterministic processes (PDP). Section 11.8 sheds additional light on the origin of discrete events by an analysis of the role dissipative bistability plays in obtaining discreteness in classical physics.
The basic idea of quantum mechanics is that the property of any system can be in a state of superposition of various possibilities (or eigen states).This state of superposition is also known as wave function and it evolves linearly with time in a deterministic way in accordance with the Schrodinger equation.However, when a measurement is carried out on the system to determine the value of that property (say position), the system instantaneously transforms to one of the eigen states and thus we get only a single value as an outcome of the measurement.Quantum measurement problem seeks to find the cause and exact mechanism governing this transformation.In an attempt to solve the above problem, in this paper, we will first define what the wave function represents in real-world and will identify the root cause behind the stochastic nature of events.Then, we will develop a model to explain the mechanism of collapse of the quantum mechanical wave function in response to a measurement.In the process of development of model, we will explain Schrodinger cat paradox and will show how Born's rule for probability becomes a natural consequence of the measurement process.
ABSTRACT This essay aims at reviewing one of the major difficulties affecting the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, that is, the well‐known measurement problem. As it will be explained, the latter originates as a consequence of the quantum theory's postulates. Referring to this, we analyze in particular the conceptual issues implied by the projection (or collapse) rule. After having presented the measurement problem, we then illustrate three possible solutions offered by major interpretations of/alternatives to quantum theory: Bohmian mechanics, Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theories, and the many‐worlds interpretation. As the reader will see, these theoretical frameworks solve this issue by virtue of their unambiguous ontologies and consistent dynamical laws. Finally, a synopsis of the open debates and future perspectives concerning the measurement problem in relativistic contexts concludes the paper.
This chapter is concerned with the measure of quantum states . This requires one to introduce the subtle notion of quantum measurement , an operation that has no counterpart in the classical domain. To this effect, we first need to develop some new tools, starting with Dirac notation , a formalism that is not only very elegant but is relatively simple to handle. The introduction of Dirac notation makes it possible to become familiar with the inner product for quantum states, as well as different properties for operators and states concerning projection , change of basis , unitary transformations , matrix elements , similarity transformations , eigenvalues and eigenstates , spectral decomposition and diagonal representation , matrix trace and density operator or matrix . The concept of density matrix makes it possible to provide a very first and brief hint of the analog of Shannon's entropy in the quantum world, referred to as von Neumann's entropy , to be further developed in Chapter 21. Once we have all the required tools, we can focus on quantum measurement and analyze three different types referred to as basis-state measurements , projection or von Neumann measurements , and POVM measurements. In particular, POVM measurements are shown to possess a remarkable property of unambiguous quantum state discrimination (UQSD), after which it is possible to derive “absolutely certain” information from unknown system states. The more complex case of quantum measurements in composite systems described by joint or tensor states is then considered.