Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chemical Physics Letters

Reply to comment on ‘Multiple quantum coherences in liquid state NMR and nonlinear optics; collective vs. local origin’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 357 (2002) 327]

Shaul Mukamel

Published Jan 1, 2003• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0009-2614(02)01852-3

Related papers

Multiple quantum coherences in liquid state NMR and nonlinear optics: collective vs local origin

Shaul Mukamel, Andreas Tortschanoff

Chemical Physics Letters•May 1, 2002•20 citations

Reply to the Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Anthony J. Horsewill

Chemical Physics Letters•Nov 29, 2006•4 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Remarks on the structure of states of composite quantum systems and envariance’ [Phys. Lett. A 355 (2006) 180]” [Phys. Lett. A 375 (2011) 1160]

Ph. Blanchard, Erwin Brüning

Physics Letters A•Dec 31, 2010•1 citation

Reply to the Comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real?

W. S. Warren, Qiuhong He, Mark A. McCoy +1 more

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 15, 1992•38 citations

Comment on “many-body quantum system in the presence of solvable potential”

Francisco Marcelo Fernández

The European Physical Journal Plus•Apr 3, 2023•2 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘One-state vector formalism for the evolution of a quantum state through nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers’ ”

Karol Bartkiewicz, Antonín Černoch, Dalibor Javůrek +3 more

In our recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 91, 012103 (2015)] we have provided an alternative description of a highly debated experiment by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)]. The former paper has been recently commented on by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 93, 036103 (2016)]. In this Reply we demonstrate that the comments are either invalid or, where valid, do not affect the results of our original paper.

Physical Review A•Mar 31, 2016•7 citations