Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

QBism

Published Oct 8, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789813273702_0019

Related papers

Introducing QBism

Christopher A. Fuchs

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•11 citations

A Critic Looks at QBism

Guido Bacciagaluppi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•9 citations

A No-Go Result for QBism

Shan Gao

arXiv:2501.03274•Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 2021•1 citation

QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed

Ali Barzegar

arXiv:2006.02790•Foundations of Physics•May 19, 2020•23 citations

Phenomenology and QBism

Philipp Berghofer, Harald A. Wiltsche

Routledge eBooks•Nov 20, 2023•9 citations

Towards Better Understanding QBism

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Recently I posted a paper entitled "External observer reflections on QBism". As any external observer, I was not able to reflect all features of QBism properly. The comments I received from one of QBism's creators, C. A. Fuchs, were very valuable to me in better understanding the views of QBists. Some of QBism's features are very delicate and extracting them from articles of QBists is not a simple task. Therefore, I hope that the second portion of my reflections on QBism (or, strictly speaking, my reflections on Fuchs reflections on my earlier reflections) might be interesting and useful for other experts in quantum foundations and quantum information theory (especially, taking into account my previous aggressively anti-QBism position). In the present paper I correct some of my earlier posted critical comments on QBism. At the same time, other critical comments gained new validation through my recent deeper understanding of QBists views on a number of problems.

arXiv:1604.07766•Foundations of Science•Feb 21, 2017•16 citations
Recently I posted a paper entitled "External observer reflections on QBism". As any external observer, I was not able to reflect all features of QBism properly. The comments I received from one of QBism's creators, C. A. Fuchs, were very valuable to me in better understanding the views of QBists. Some of QBism's features are very delicate and extracting them from articles of QBists is not a simple task. Therefore, I hope that the second portion of my reflections on QBism (or, strictly speaking, my reflections on Fuchs reflections on my earlier reflections) might be interesting and useful for other experts in quantum foundations and quantum information theory (especially, taking into account my previous aggressively anti-QBism position). In the present paper I correct some of my earlier posted critical comments on QBism. At the same time, other critical comments gained new validation through my recent deeper understanding of QBists views on a number of problems.