Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

On the application of bargmann hilbert spaces to dynamical problems

Silvan S. Schweber

Published Oct 1, 1966• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0003-4916(66)90243-0

Related papers

On the application of Bargmann Hilbert spaces to dynamical problems

Silvan S. Schweber

Annals of Physics•Feb 1, 1967•113 citations

Dynamics and Averages in Hilbert Space

Jochen Gemmer B, Mathias Michel A, Güunter Mahler

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Nonbijective canonical transformations and their representation in quantum mechanics

Peter Krämer, M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1978•29 citations

Hilbert space description of classical dynamical systems II

K. Kowalski

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Sep 1, 1988•10 citations

The Clebsch–Gordan problem of the SL(2,R) coherent states

Debabrata Basu

The Clebsch–Gordan problems of the Barut–Girardello, and Perelomov coherent states of SL(2,R) are studied using the associated Hilbert spaces as the respective carrier spaces of the representations of the group. For the Barut–Girardello coherent states this Hilbert space is a subspace of the Bargmann–Segal Hilbert space B(C2) called the ‘‘reduced Bargmann space.’’ The generators of the group in this realization are essentially the boson operators of Holman and Biedenharn which provide a convenient starting point of the problem. For the Perelomov coherent states the associated Hilbert space turns out to be Bargmann’s canonical carrier space for the realization of the discrete series of representations, namely, the Hilbert space of functions analytic inside the open unit disc. The scalar product, the principal vector, and a complete orthonormal set in these Hilbert spaces are constructed and used for the explicit evaluation of the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients. For each of the coherent state systems the product state turns out to be the principal vector and, therefore, the coupled state itself is the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient. For the Barut–Girardello coherent states this is, apart from normalization, the product of a Bessel function and d-function. For the Perelomov coherent states, on the other hand, this closely resembles the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient of the SU(2) coherent states.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1992•5 citations

Comment on ‘Solving the two-mode squeezed harmonic oscillator and thekth-order harmonic generation in Bargmann–Hilbert spaces’

Chi‐Fai Lo

Recently Zhang (2013 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 455302) proposed an analytical approach to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the single-mode and two-mode squeezed harmonic oscillators in the Bargmann space of entire functions. In this comment we show that the eigenfunctions of these two systems exist in closed form and are expressed in terms of the Hermite polynomials. Moreover, since both oscillators exhibit the SU(1,1) dynamical symmetry, the eigenvalue problem can be tackled in a unified manner. In the Hilbert space of analytic functions of a complex variable in the unit disc, the energy eigenvalue equations involve first-order ordinary differential equations only, so we can easily solve these equations to obtain simple closed-form solutions.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jan 30, 2014•4 citations
In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.
The Clebsch–Gordan problems of the Barut–Girardello, and Perelomov coherent states of SL(2,R) are studied using the associated Hilbert spaces as the respective carrier spaces of the representations of the group. For the Barut–Girardello coherent states this Hilbert space is a subspace of the Bargmann–Segal Hilbert space B(C2) called the ‘‘reduced Bargmann space.’’ The generators of the group in this realization are essentially the boson operators of Holman and Biedenharn which provide a convenient starting point of the problem. For the Perelomov coherent states the associated Hilbert space turns out to be Bargmann’s canonical carrier space for the realization of the discrete series of representations, namely, the Hilbert space of functions analytic inside the open unit disc. The scalar product, the principal vector, and a complete orthonormal set in these Hilbert spaces are constructed and used for the explicit evaluation of the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients. For each of the coherent state systems the product state turns out to be the principal vector and, therefore, the coupled state itself is the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient. For the Barut–Girardello coherent states this is, apart from normalization, the product of a Bessel function and d-function. For the Perelomov coherent states, on the other hand, this closely resembles the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient of the SU(2) coherent states.
Recently Zhang (2013 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 455302) proposed an analytical approach to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the single-mode and two-mode squeezed harmonic oscillators in the Bargmann space of entire functions. In this comment we show that the eigenfunctions of these two systems exist in closed form and are expressed in terms of the Hermite polynomials. Moreover, since both oscillators exhibit the SU(1,1) dynamical symmetry, the eigenvalue problem can be tackled in a unified manner. In the Hilbert space of analytic functions of a complex variable in the unit disc, the energy eigenvalue equations involve first-order ordinary differential equations only, so we can easily solve these equations to obtain simple closed-form solutions.