Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Philosophia Mathematica

CLAUS BEISBART and STEPHAN HARTMANN eds. Probabilities in Physics

Published Nov 10, 2011• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Journal Article Claus Beisbart and Stephan Hartmann eds. Probabilities in Physics Get access Claus Beisbart and Stephan Hartmann eds. Probabilities in Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. ISBN 978-0-19-957743-9. Pp. xii + 437. Philosophia Mathematica, Volume 20, Issue 1, February 2012, Page 134, https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkr034 Published: 10 November 2011

DOI
10.1093/philmat/nkr034

Related papers

Some Mathematical Problems in Quantum Mechanics

Tosio Kato

Tosio Kato; Some Mathematical Problems in Quantum Mechanics, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, Volume 40, 1 February 1967, Pages 3–19, https://doi.org

Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement•Jan 1, 1967•35 citations

Schrödinger: Centenary Celebration of a Polymath

Noel Cottingham

C W Kilmister (ed) 1987 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ix + 253 pp price £30 ISBN 0 521 34017 9 Many of the invited papers presented at a conference held in April 1987 to celebrate the centenary of Erwin Schrödinger's birth are contained in this book. For the most part they deal with scientific issues with which Schrödinger was concerned.

Physics Bulletin•Nov 1, 1987•8 citations

Quantum Probability: An Introduction

Guido Bacciagaluppi

The topic of probabilty in quantum mechanics is rather vast, and in this article, we shall choose to discuss it from the perspective of whether and in what sense quantum mechanics requires a generalisation of the usual (Kolmogorovian) concept of probability. We shall focus on the case of finite-dimensional quantum mechanics (which is analogous to that of discrete probability spaces), partly for simplicity and partly for ease of generalisation. While we shall largely focus on formal aspects of quantum probability (in particular the non-existence of joint distributions for incompatible observables), our discussion will relate also to notorious issues in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Indeed, whether quantum probability can or cannot be ultimately reduced to classical probability connects rather nicely to the question of 'hidden variables' in quantum mechanics. An abridged version of this essay will appear in A. Hajek and C. Hitchcock (eds.), 'The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy', Oxford University Press. The present version includes in particular many more footnotes and references and the Appendix with the proofs of the Lemma and Proposition of Section 5.

•Feb 14, 2014•3 citations

A Note on the Generalized Statistics

F. Ferrari, C. Villi

F. Ferrari, C. C. Villi; A Note on the Generalized Statistics, Progress of Theoretical Physics, Volume 11, Issue 3, 1 March 1954, Pages 328–329, https://doi.org

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1954•1 citation

PROBABILITIES, CAUSES AND PROPENSITIES IN PHYSICS (SYNTHESE LIBRARY, SPRINGER). CHAPTERS 0 & 1 (CONTENTS & INTRODUCTION)

Mauricio Suárez

These are the introduction chapters to the forthcoming collection of essays published by Springer (Synthese Library) and entitled Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics.

•Dec 1, 2009•0 citations

Quantum Leaps

Journal Article Quantum Leaps Get access The Computer Bulletin, Volume 40, Issue 4, July 1998, Pages 18–19, https://doi.org/10.1093/combul/40.4.18 Published: 01 July 1998

The Computer Bulletin•Jul 1, 1998•1 citation
Journal Article Claus Beisbart and Stephan Hartmann eds. Probabilities in Physics Get access Claus Beisbart and Stephan Hartmann eds. Probabilities in Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. ISBN 978-0-19-957743-9. Pp. xii + 437. Philosophia Mathematica, Volume 20, Issue 1, February 2012, Page 134, https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkr034 Published: 10 November 2011
The topic of probabilty in quantum mechanics is rather vast, and in this article, we shall choose to discuss it from the perspective of whether and in what sense quantum mechanics requires a generalisation of the usual (Kolmogorovian) concept of probability. We shall focus on the case of finite-dimensional quantum mechanics (which is analogous to that of discrete probability spaces), partly for simplicity and partly for ease of generalisation. While we shall largely focus on formal aspects of quantum probability (in particular the non-existence of joint distributions for incompatible observables), our discussion will relate also to notorious issues in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Indeed, whether quantum probability can or cannot be ultimately reduced to classical probability connects rather nicely to the question of 'hidden variables' in quantum mechanics. An abridged version of this essay will appear in A. Hajek and C. Hitchcock (eds.), 'The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy', Oxford University Press. The present version includes in particular many more footnotes and references and the Appendix with the proofs of the Lemma and Proposition of Section 5.