Preparation, I have often said, is rightly two-thirds of any venture. Amelia Earhart Summary Correlation functions provide a direct way to characterize and analyze many-body systems, both theoretically and experimentally. In this chapter we review the properties of one- and two-body correlation functions in quantum systems, with emphasis on several key quantities: static density correlations that determine the energy and thermodynamic potentials, dynamic correlation functions such as response functions that describe excitations of the system, and Green's functions that are basic tools in the theory of interacting many-body systems. Correlation functions are central quantities in the description of interacting many-body systems, both in the theoretical formulation and in the analysis of experiments. In contrast to single numbers like the total energy, correlation functions reveal far more information about the electrons, how they arrange themselves, and the spectra of their excitations. In contrast to the many-body wavefunctions that contain all the information on the system, correlation functions extract the information most directly relevant to experimentally measurable properties. Dynamic current–current correlation functions are sufficient to determine the electrical and optical properties: one-body Green's functions describe the spectra of excitations when one electron is added to or removed from the system, static and dynamic correlations are measured using scattering techniques, and so forth. In this chapter we present the basic definitions and properties of correlation functions and Green's functions that are the basis for much of the developments in the following chapters. In general, a correlation function quantifies the correlation between two or more quantities at different points in space r , time t , or spin σ . Very often the correlation function can be specified as a function of the Fourier-transformed variables, momentum (wavevector) k , and frequency ω . It is useful to distinguish between a dynamic correlation function which describes the correlation between events at different times and a static or equal-time correlation function, by which we mean that of a property measured or computed with “snapshots” of the system. Also, the different correlation functions can be classified by the number of particles and/or fields involved.
Preparation, I have often said, is rightly two-thirds of any venture. Amelia Earhart Summary Correlation functions provide a direct way to characterize and analyze many-body systems, both theoretically and experimentally. In this chapter we review the properties of one- and two-body correlation functions in quantum systems, with emphasis on several key quantities: static density correlations that determine the energy and thermodynamic potentials, dynamic correlation functions such as response functions that describe excitations of the system, and Green's functions that are basic tools in the theory of interacting many-body systems. Correlation functions are central quantities in the description of interacting many-body systems, both in the theoretical formulation and in the analysis of experiments. In contrast to single numbers like the total energy, correlation functions reveal far more information about the electrons, how they arrange themselves, and the spectra of their excitations. In contrast to the many-body wavefunctions that contain all the information on the system, correlation functions extract the information most directly relevant to experimentally measurable properties. Dynamic current–current correlation functions are sufficient to determine the electrical and optical properties: one-body Green's functions describe the spectra of excitations when one electron is added to or removed from the system, static and dynamic correlations are measured using scattering techniques, and so forth. In this chapter we present the basic definitions and properties of correlation functions and Green's functions that are the basis for much of the developments in the following chapters. In general, a correlation function quantifies the correlation between two or more quantities at different points in space r , time t , or spin σ . Very often the correlation function can be specified as a function of the Fourier-transformed variables, momentum (wavevector) k , and frequency ω . It is useful to distinguish between a dynamic correlation function which describes the correlation between events at different times and a static or equal-time correlation function, by which we mean that of a property measured or computed with “snapshots” of the system. Also, the different correlation functions can be classified by the number of particles and/or fields involved.
To avoid confusion, it is necessary to be quite explicit about what is assumed and what is to be proved. A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 121, 950 (1961) Summary The topic of this chapter is functionals that provide a concise formulation for thermodynamic quantities and Green's function methods in interacting many-body systems. Building upon the instructive examples of density functional theory and the Hartree– Fock approximation, functionals of the Green's function are developed to provide a framework for practical methods used extensively in many-body perturbation theory (Chs. 9–15), dynamical mean-field theory (Chs. 16–20), and their combination in Ch. 21. Functional concepts give a firm foundation for those methods, for example, they give the conditions for approximations to obey conservation laws. Additional background and specific aspects are in App. H. Many physical quantities can be expressed as functionals , i.e., they depend on an entire function.1 For example, in the quantum variational method to determine a wavefunction, the total energy of a system of many electrons is a functional of a many-body trial wavefunction ( r 1 , r 2 , …): it is the expectation value of the hamiltonian. At the variational minimum, assuming the trial wavefunction is completely flexible, one finds the many-body Schrödinger equation for the ground state. Many of the properties we are interested in are, formally, simple functionals of the ground- or excited-state wavefunctions. In the search for feasible ways to calculate properties such as excitation spectra, we are led to different types of functional. The idea is to deal only with a physical, measurable quantity Q of interest and a variational functional E [ Q ] of this quantity. The variational character of E allows one to derive equations that determine Q 0 , the value of Q for the system in a desired state, typically the ground state or equilibrium state at T ≠ 0. Other properties should be different functionals F m [ Q ] that can then be evaluated at Q = Q 0 . This strategy is outlined in Fig. 8.1. To appreciate the power of such approaches, one can consider the impact of density functional theory, which is formulated as a functional of the density n ( r ) of electrons; it is defined for a range of densities and the variational minimum for the energy functional E [ n ] leads to equations to determine the actual ground-state density n 0 ( r ) and total energy E 0 .
In no wave function of the type (1) [product of single determinants for each spin] is there a statistical correlation between the positions of the electrons with antiparallel spin. The purpose of the aforementioned generalization of (1) is to allow for such correlations. This will lead to an improvement of the wave function and, therefore, to a lowering of the energy value. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 46, 1002 (1934) Summary Although the exact many-body wavefunction cannot be written down in general, we do know of some of its properties. For example, there are differences between the wavefunctions of insulators and metals and the cusp condition gives the behavior as any two charges approach each other. In this chapter we also discuss approximate wavefunctions, ways to judge their accuracy and how to include electronic correlation. Examples of many-body wavefunctions are the Slater–Jastrow (pair product) wavefunction and its generalization to pairing and backflow wavefunctions. In other places in this book, we argue that it is not necessary to look at the many-body wavefunctions explicitly because they are unwieldy; the one- and two-body correlation functions discussed in Ch. 5 are sufficient to determine the energy and give information on the excitation spectra. However, these correlation functions do not always contain all information of interest. In principle, the ground-state energy of a many-electron system is a functional of the density, but the very derivation of the theorem invokes the many-body wavefunction, as expressed explicitly in Eq. (4.16). The effects of antisymmetry are manifest in the correlation functions, but antisymmetry is most simply viewed as a property of the wavefunction; electronic correlation is fundamentally a result of properties of the many-body wavefunction. Studying many-body wavefunctions provides a very useful, different point of view of many-body physics from the approaches based on correlation functions. Many of the most important discoveries in physics have come about by understanding the nature of wavefunctions, such as the Laughlin wavefunction for the fractional quantum Hall effect, the BCS wavefunction for superconductors, p-wave pairing in superfluid 3 He, and the Heitler– London approach for molecular binding. The role of Berry's phases has brought out the importance of the phase of the wavefunction in determining properties of quantum systems. This has led to new understanding of the classification of insulators, metals, superconductors, vortices, and other states of condensed matter.
This chapter presents field-theoretic methods and discusses three well-known "pictures" or representations used in discussing quantum mechanical problems. It explores how to build up the true one-electron and one-phonon Green's functions as a perturbation series involving the corresponding functions for the non-interacting system. In elementary discussions of quantum mechanics one usually works in the "Schrodinger picture" in which the dynamical variables are taken to be time independent so that the wave function contains the time dependence of the problem. The one-electron Green's function gives information about the spin and charge densities and the momentum distribution of the electrons as well as information about the excitation spectrum of the system. When the system consists only of fermions interacting via an instantaneous two-body potential, the one-particle Green's function also suffices to determine the ground-state energy of the system. The electrical conductivity, magnetic susceptibility, and many other non-equilibrium properties can be obtained from the two-particle Green's function.
The equilibrium state of a system consisting of a large number of strongly interacting electrons can be characterized by its density operator. This gives a direct access to the ground-state energy or, at finite temperatures, to the free energy of the system as well as to other static physical quantities. Elementary excitations of the system, on the other hand, are described within the language of Green's functions, i.e. time- or frequency-dependent dynamic quantities which give a direct access to the linear response of the system subjected to a weak time-dependent external perturbation. A typical example is angle-revolved photoemission spectroscopy which is linked to the single-electron Green's function. Since usually both, the static as well as the dynamic physical quantities, cannot be obtained exactly for lattice fermion models like the Hubbard model, one has to resort to approximations. Opposed to more ad hoc treatments, variational principles promise to provide consistent and controlled approximations. Here, the Ritz principle and a generalized version of the Ritz principle at finite temperatures for the static case on the one hand and a dynamical variational principle for the single-electron Green's function or the self-energy on the other hand are introduced, discussed in detail and compared to each other to show up conceptual similarities and differences. In particular, the construction recipe for non-perturbative dynamic approximations is taken over from the construction of static mean-field theory based on the generalized Ritz principle. Within the two different frameworks, it is shown which types of approximations are accessible, and their respective weaknesses and strengths are worked out. Static Hartree-Fock theory as well as dynamical mean-field theory are found as the prototypical approximations.
Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance. Confucius, 500 BCE Summary The topic of this chapter is a small selection of the vast array of experimentally observed phenomena chosen to exemplify crucial roles played by the electron– electron interaction. Examples in the present chapter bring out the effects of correlation in ground and excited states as well as in thermal equilibrium. These raise challenges for theory and quantitative many-body methods in treating interacting electrons, the topics of the following chapters. The title of this book is Interacting Electrons . Of course, there are no non-interacting electrons: in any system with more than one electron, the electron–electron interaction affects the energy and leads to correlation between the electrons. All first-principles theories deal with the electron–electron interaction in some way, but often they treat the electrons as independent fermions in a static mean-field potential that contains interaction effects approximately. As described in Ch. 4, the Hartree–Fock method is a variational approximation with a wavefunction for fermions that are uncorrelated, except for the requirement of antisymmetry. The Kohn–Sham approach to DFT defines an auxiliary system of independent fermions that is chosen to reproduce the ground-state density. It is exact in principle and remarkably successful in practice. However, many properties such as excitation energies are not supposed to be taken directly from the Kohn–Sham equations, even in principle. Various other methods attempt to incorporate some effect of correlation in the choice of the potential. This chapter is designed to highlight a few examples of experimentally observed phenomena that demonstrate qualitative consequences of electron–electron interactions beyond independent-particle approximations. Some examples illustrate effects that cannot be accounted for in any theory where electrons are considered as independent particles. Others are direct experimental measurements of correlation functions that would vanish if the electrons were independent. In yet other cases, a phenomenon can be explained in terms of independent particles in some effective potential, but it is deeply unsatisfying if one has to invent a different potential for every case, even for different properties in the same material. A satisfactory theory ultimately requires us to confront the problem of interacting, correlated electrons.
Art is the elimination of the unnecessary. Pablo Picasso Summary Condensed matter is constituted by a huge number of electrons and nuclei interacting with Coulomb potentials. The topic of this chapter is a way to deal with the full, coupled problem by separating it into a part that is tractable and the rest that is approximated. This naturally leads to the appearance of dynamical fields, and to the concept of “quasi-particles” that have the same quantum numbers as non-interacting electrons. The quasi-particles obey equations where the potential and bare interactions in the hamiltonian are replaced by dynamical self-energies and screened interactions that can describe many of the effects of correlation. In this chapter we discuss the intuitive concepts behind this approach in general terms to motivate the more rigorous formulations and approximations used in the Green's function methods of the following chapter and in Part III. The first equations of this book, Eqs. (1.1) and (1.2), express the fundamental theory of matter in terms of electrons and nuclei that interact with Coulomb potentials. For systems with only a few electrons, a solution of the problem can be obtained by exact diagonalization, using configuration interaction methods. For many-electron systems one has to resort to other methods. For example, QMC stochastic simulations (Chs. 22–25) are among the most accurate methods known to calculate certain expectation values, such as equilibrium thermodynamic properties, total energies, the density, and various static correlation functions like those in Ch. 5. Other properties such as excitation spectra are more difficult to access with QMC. Straightforward perturbation theory is, in general, not appropriate since interactions among the electrons are of the same order of magnitude as the independent-particle terms. Hence, we must develop other approaches. One strategy that gives access to equilibrium thermodynamic as well as dynamical excitation properties is to separate the interacting many-body problem into a part that is tractable by some means and the rest of the problem that is dealt with more approximately. The present chapter is devoted to this idea. It is a prelude to many-body Green's function methods; the aim is to provide a unified framework for the developments in Chs. 8–21, along with a qualitative description of the most relevant quantities.