Synopsis: e mathematics behind the deceptively simple ideas encountered in the spin measurements from the first chapter is further developed. Technically, we limit ourselves to finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, although exceptions are pointed out along the way. e operator/matrix analogy is developed, and important physical and mathematical concepts are defined and refined. ese concepts include operator compatibility, uncertainty relations, and unitary transformations. Unitary transformations are applied to coordinate transformations and used to develop the Heisenberg time-development picture in quantum mechanics.
Synopsis: e mathematics behind the deceptively simple ideas encountered in the spin measurements from the first chapter is further developed. Technically, we limit ourselves to finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, although exceptions are pointed out along the way. e operator/matrix analogy is developed, and important physical and mathematical concepts are defined and refined. ese concepts include operator compatibility, uncertainty relations, and unitary transformations. Unitary transformations are applied to coordinate transformations and used to develop the Heisenberg time-development picture in quantum mechanics.
Synopsis: The mathematics behind the deceptively simple ideas encountered in the spin measurements from the first chapter is further developed. Technically, we limit ourselves to finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, although exceptions are pointed out along the way. The operator/matrix analogy is developed, and important physical and mathematical concepts are defined and refined. These concepts include operator compatibility, uncertainty relations, and unitary transformations. Unitary transformations are applied to coordinate transformations and used to develop the Heisenberg time-development picture in quantum mechanics.
We have seen in the previous chapter how useful wave mechanics can be in solving physical problems. But wave mechanics has several limitations. It describes physical states by means of wave functions, which are functions of the positions of the particles of the system, but why should we single out position as the fundamental physical observable? For instance, we might want to describe states in terms of probability amplitudes for particles to have certain values of the momentum or energy rather than the position. A more fundamental limitation is that there are attributes of physical systems that cannot be described at all in terms of the positions and momenta of a set of particles. One of these attributes is spin , which will be a chief subject of Chapter 4. Another is the value of the electric or magnetic field at some point in space, treated in Chapter 11. This chapter will describe the principles of quantum mechanics in a formalism which is essentially the “transformation theory” of Dirac, mentioned briefly in Section 1.4. This formalism generalizes both the wave mechanics of Schrödinger and the matrix mechanics of Heisenberg, and is sufficiently comprehensive to apply to any sort of physical system. States The first postulate of quantum mechanics is that physical states can be represented as vectors in a sort of abstract space known as Hilbert space . Before getting into Hilbert space, I need to say a bit about vectors in general. In kindergarten we learn that vectors are quantities with both magnitude and direction. Later, when we study analytic geometry, we learn instead to describe a vector in d dimensions as a string of d numbers, the components of the vector. The latter approach lends itself well to calculation, but in some respects the kindergarten version is better, because it allows us to describe relations among vectors without specifying a coordinate system. For instance, a statement that one vector is parallel to a second vector, or perpendicular to a third, has nothing to do with how we choose our coordinate system. Here we will formulate what we mean by vector spaces in general, and Hilbert space in particular, in a way that is independent of the coordinates we use to describe directions in these spaces.
The quantities in physics that can be measured are conventionally denoted observables : entities that can be observed (directly or indirectly) and to which a value in appropriate units can be assigned. Examples include position, momentum, and energy. Unlike in classical physics, the concept of an observable in quantum theory possesses a significance beyond that of the measurable: to each observable there corresponds a unique operator in an abstract, linear vector space. These operators (and others) govern all aspects of quantum systems. Quantum operators act on abstract vectors in the linear space. Especially important are the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of these operators, in particular because some of the eigenvectors are the quantum states mentioned in the preceding chapters. Furthermore, for any operator that is the mathematical image of an observable, its eigenvalues constitute the entire set of values that measurement of the observable can yield . Finally, from the quantum states one can obtain the probabilities for the occurrence of events in the microscopic world, for example, the most likely value that measurement of an observable will yield. The concepts of operators and eigenvalue problems, as well as those of quantal probabilities, of Hermiticity, and of complete sets, were encountered and exemplified in the preceding chapter using the language of differential equations. While much of quantum mechanics could be presented in terms of this language alone, certain fundamental concepts (spin, for instance) cannot be, and it eventually becomes necessary to consider quantum mechanics as a theoretical framework embedded in that abstract linear vector space known as a Hilbert space.
We have seen in the previous chapter how useful wave mechanics can be in solving physical problems. But wave mechanics has several limitations. It describes physical states by means of wave functions, which are functions of the positions of the particles of the system, but why should we single out position as the fundamental physical observable? For instance, we might want to describe states in terms of probability amplitudes for particles to have certain values of the momentum or energy rather than the position. A more fundamental limitation: There are attributes of physical systems that cannot be described at all in terms of the positions and momenta of a set of particles. One of these attributes is spin , which will be the subject of Chapter 4. Another is the value of the electric or magnetic field at some point in space, treated in Chapter 11. This chapter will describe the principles of quantum mechanics in a formalism which is essentially the “transformation theory” of Dirac, mentioned briefly in Section 1.4. This formalism generalizes both the wave mechanics of Schrödinger and the matrix mechanics of Heisenberg, and is sufficiently comprehensive to apply to any sort of physical system. States The first postulate of quantum mechanics is that physical states can be represented as vectors in a sort of abstract space known as Hilbert space . Before getting into Hilbert space, I need to say a bit about vectors in general. In kindergarten we learn that vectors are quantities with both magnitude and direction. Later, when we study analytic geometry, we learn instead to describe a vector in d dimensions as a string of d numbers, the components of the vector. This latter approach lends itself well to calculation, but in some respects the kindergarten version is better, because it allows us to describe relations among vectors without specifying a coordinate system. For instance, a statement that one vector is parallel to a second vector, or perpendicular to a third, has nothing to do with how we choose our coordinate system.
This chapter employs the following notation and basic formulae of quantum mechanics; the units are such that h = c = 1. Observables are represented in quantum mechanics by Hermitian operators in Hilbert space. These operators are analogues of finite-dimensional Hermitian operators, but the infinite dimensionality requires some mathematical explanation. The physical fact that not all measurements (preparations) are compatible with each other corresponds to the fact that not all operators commute. The ‘state’ of a physical system is fully determined in one way or another if a complete set of compatible measurements has been carried through such that no further measurement exists which is compatible with, and which is not simply a calculable function of, those measurements already made. Since not all independent measurements are compatible, there exist several non-compatible ‘complete sets of measurements’ for a given physical system, which lead to different aspects of that system.
This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.