Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Introduction

Hans-Jürgen Stöckmann

Published Oct 13, 1999• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

From the very beginning classical nonlinear dynamics has enjoyed much popularity even among the noneducated public as is documented by numerous articles in well-renowned magazines, including nonscientific papers. For its nonclassical counterpart, the quantum mechanics of chaotic systems, termed in short ‘quantum chaos’, the situation is completely different. It has always been considered as a more or less mysterious topic, reserved to a small exclusive circle of theoreticians. Whereas the applicability of classical nonlinear dynamics to daily life is comprehensible for a complete outsider, quantum chaos, on the other hand, seems to be of no practical relevance at all. Moreover, in classical nonlinear dynamics the theory is supported by numerous experiments, mainly in hydrodynamics and laser physics, whereas quantum chaos at first sight seems to be the exclusive domain of theoreticians. In the beginning the only experimental contributions came from nuclear physics [Por65]. This preponderance of theory seems to have suppressed any experimental effort for nearly two decades. The situation gradually changed in the middle of the eighties, since when numerous experiments have been performed. An introductory presentation also suited to the experimentalist with no or only little basic knowledge is still missing. It is the intention of this monograph to demonstrate that there is no reason to be afraid of quantum chaos. The underlying ideas are very simple. It is essentially the mathematical apparatus that makes things difficult and often tends to obscure the physical background.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511524622.002

Related papers

Introduction

R. Blümel, William P. Reinhardt

By now the “chaos revolution” has reached nearly every branch of the natural sciences. In fact, chaos is everywhere. To name but a few examples, we talk about chaotic weather patterns, chaotic chemical reactions and the chaotic evolution of insect populations. Atomic and molecular physics are no exceptions. At first glance this is surprising since atoms and molecules are well described by the linear laws of quantum mechanics, while an essential ingredient of chaos is nonlinearity in the dynamic equations. Thus, chaos and atomic physics seem to have little to do with each other. But recently, atomic and molecular physicists have pushed the limits of their experiments to such high quantum numbers that it starts to make sense, in the spirit of Bohr's correspondence principle, to compare the results of atomic physics experiments with the predictions of classical mechanics, which, for the most part, show complexity and chaos. The most striking observation in recent years has been that quantum systems seem to “know” whether their classical counterparts display regular or chaotic motion. This fact can be understood intuitively on the basis of Feynman's version of quantum mechanics. In 1948 Feynman showed that quantum mechanics can be formulated on the basis of classical mechanics with the help of path integrals. Therefore it is expected that the quantum mechanics of an atom or molecule is profoundly influenced, but of course not completely determined, by the qualitative behaviour of its underlying classical mechanics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jul 24, 1997•0 citations

Introduction

Giulio Casati, Boris Chirikov

The present collection of papers is devoted to a rather new and very controversial topic, the so-called “quantum chaos”. Some researchers see nothing essentially new at all in this phenomenon (apart from a number of various examples and models), and they have good reason to believe so. Indeed, the problems in this field all belong to the traditional, “old-fashion”, and rather “simple” quantum mechanics of finite-dimensional systems with a given interaction and no quantized fields. Nevertheless, many, including ourselves, consider quantum chaos to be a new discovery, though in an old field, of a great importance for fundamental physics. To understand this, the phenomenon of quantum chaos should be put into its proper perspective in recent developments in physics. The central point of this perspective is the conception of dynamical chaos (also a rather new topic) in classical mechanics (for a good review see, e.g., Refs.[l-3]). Thus before discussing the current understanding of quantum chaos we need briefly to describe classical dynamical chaos

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 27, 1995•0 citations

An Introduction to Quantum Chaos

Mason Alexander Porter

Nonlinear dynamics (``chaos theory'') and quantum mechanics are two of the scientific triumphs of the 20th century. The former lies at the heart of the modern interdisciplinary approach to science, whereas the latter has revolutionized physics. Both chaos theory and quantum mechanics have achieved a fairly large level of glamour in the eyes of the general public. The study of quantum chaos encompasses the application of dynamical systems theory in the quantum regime. In the present article, we give a brief review of the origin and fundamentals of both quantum mechanics and nonlinear dynamics. We recount the birth of dynamical systems theory and contrast chaotic motion with integrable motion. We similarly recall the transition from classical to quantum mechanics and discuss the origin of the latter. We then consider the interplay between nonlinear dynamics and quantum mechanics via a classification and explanation of the three types of quantum chaos. We include several recent results in this discussion.

arXiv:nlin/0107039•Jul 17, 2001•3 citations

Quantum Chaos

Quantum Chaos provides a comprehensive overview of our understanding of chaotic behaviour in a wide variety of quantum and semiclassical systems, and describes both experimental and theoretical investigations. A general introduction sets out the main features of chaos in quantum systems. Thereafter, in an authoritative collection of papers, prominent scientists put forward their particular interpretations of quantum chaos, with reference to a broad range of interesting physical systems. As yet, there is no universally accepted definition of quantum chaos. However, by dealing with such a wide range of topics from different branches of physics, this book provides an overview of this rapidly expanding field, and will be of great interest to graduate students and researchers in many areas of physics and chemistry.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 27, 1995•153 citations

Nonequilibrium Physics at Short Time Scales: Formation of Correlations

Luca Peliti

It is a happy situation when similar concepts and theoretical techniques can be applied to widely different physical systems because of a deep similarity in the situations being studied. The book illustrates this well; it focuses on the description of correlations in quantum systems out of equilibrium at very short time scales, prompted by experiments with short laser pulses in semiconductors, and in complex reactions in heavy nuclei. In both cases the experiments are characterized by nonlinear dynamics and by strong correlations out of equilibrium. In some systems there are also important finite-size effects. The book comprises several independent contributions of moderate length, and I sometimes felt that a more intensive effort in cross-coordination of the different contributions could have been of help. It is divided almost equally between theory and experiment. In the theoretical part, there is a thorough discussion both of the kinematic aspects (description of correlations) and the dynamical ones (evaluation of correlations). The experimental part is naturally divided according to the nature of the system: the interaction of pulsed lasers with matter on the one hand, and the correlations in finite-size systems (nanoparticles and nuclei) on the other. There is also a discussion on the dynamics of superconductors, a subject currently of great interest. Although an effort has been made to keep each contribution self-contained, I must admit that reading level is uneven. However, there are a number of thorough and stimulating contributions that make this book a useful introduction to the topic at the level of graduate students or researchers acquainted with quantum statistical mechanics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Feb 3, 2005•10 citations

Nonlinear Quantum Dynamics

Salman Habib, Bhattacharya, Tanmoy, Andrew C. Doherty +8 more

The vast majority of the literature dealing with quantum dynamics is concerned with linear evolution of the wave function or the density matrix. A complete dynamical description requires a full understanding of the evolution of measured quantum systems, necessary to explain actual experimental results. The dynamics of such systems is intrinsically nonlinear even at the level of distribution functions, both classically as well as quantum mechanically. Aside from being physically more complete, this treatment reveals the existence of dynamical regimes, such as chaos, that have no counterpart in the linear case. Here, we present a short introductory review of some of these aspects, with a few illustrative results and examples.

•May 7, 2005•1 citation
From the very beginning classical nonlinear dynamics has enjoyed much popularity even among the noneducated public as is documented by numerous articles in well-renowned magazines, including nonscientific papers. For its nonclassical counterpart, the quantum mechanics of chaotic systems, termed in short ‘quantum chaos’, the situation is completely different. It has always been considered as a more or less mysterious topic, reserved to a small exclusive circle of theoreticians. Whereas the applicability of classical nonlinear dynamics to daily life is comprehensible for a complete outsider, quantum chaos, on the other hand, seems to be of no practical relevance at all. Moreover, in classical nonlinear dynamics the theory is supported by numerous experiments, mainly in hydrodynamics and laser physics, whereas quantum chaos at first sight seems to be the exclusive domain of theoreticians. In the beginning the only experimental contributions came from nuclear physics [Por65]. This preponderance of theory seems to have suppressed any experimental effort for nearly two decades. The situation gradually changed in the middle of the eighties, since when numerous experiments have been performed. An introductory presentation also suited to the experimentalist with no or only little basic knowledge is still missing. It is the intention of this monograph to demonstrate that there is no reason to be afraid of quantum chaos. The underlying ideas are very simple. It is essentially the mathematical apparatus that makes things difficult and often tends to obscure the physical background.
By now the “chaos revolution” has reached nearly every branch of the natural sciences. In fact, chaos is everywhere. To name but a few examples, we talk about chaotic weather patterns, chaotic chemical reactions and the chaotic evolution of insect populations. Atomic and molecular physics are no exceptions. At first glance this is surprising since atoms and molecules are well described by the linear laws of quantum mechanics, while an essential ingredient of chaos is nonlinearity in the dynamic equations. Thus, chaos and atomic physics seem to have little to do with each other. But recently, atomic and molecular physicists have pushed the limits of their experiments to such high quantum numbers that it starts to make sense, in the spirit of Bohr's correspondence principle, to compare the results of atomic physics experiments with the predictions of classical mechanics, which, for the most part, show complexity and chaos. The most striking observation in recent years has been that quantum systems seem to “know” whether their classical counterparts display regular or chaotic motion. This fact can be understood intuitively on the basis of Feynman's version of quantum mechanics. In 1948 Feynman showed that quantum mechanics can be formulated on the basis of classical mechanics with the help of path integrals. Therefore it is expected that the quantum mechanics of an atom or molecule is profoundly influenced, but of course not completely determined, by the qualitative behaviour of its underlying classical mechanics.
The present collection of papers is devoted to a rather new and very controversial topic, the so-called “quantum chaos”. Some researchers see nothing essentially new at all in this phenomenon (apart from a number of various examples and models), and they have good reason to believe so. Indeed, the problems in this field all belong to the traditional, “old-fashion”, and rather “simple” quantum mechanics of finite-dimensional systems with a given interaction and no quantized fields. Nevertheless, many, including ourselves, consider quantum chaos to be a new discovery, though in an old field, of a great importance for fundamental physics. To understand this, the phenomenon of quantum chaos should be put into its proper perspective in recent developments in physics. The central point of this perspective is the conception of dynamical chaos (also a rather new topic) in classical mechanics (for a good review see, e.g., Refs.[l-3]). Thus before discussing the current understanding of quantum chaos we need briefly to describe classical dynamical chaos
Nonlinear dynamics (``chaos theory'') and quantum mechanics are two of the scientific triumphs of the 20th century. The former lies at the heart of the modern interdisciplinary approach to science, whereas the latter has revolutionized physics. Both chaos theory and quantum mechanics have achieved a fairly large level of glamour in the eyes of the general public. The study of quantum chaos encompasses the application of dynamical systems theory in the quantum regime. In the present article, we give a brief review of the origin and fundamentals of both quantum mechanics and nonlinear dynamics. We recount the birth of dynamical systems theory and contrast chaotic motion with integrable motion. We similarly recall the transition from classical to quantum mechanics and discuss the origin of the latter. We then consider the interplay between nonlinear dynamics and quantum mechanics via a classification and explanation of the three types of quantum chaos. We include several recent results in this discussion.
Quantum Chaos provides a comprehensive overview of our understanding of chaotic behaviour in a wide variety of quantum and semiclassical systems, and describes both experimental and theoretical investigations. A general introduction sets out the main features of chaos in quantum systems. Thereafter, in an authoritative collection of papers, prominent scientists put forward their particular interpretations of quantum chaos, with reference to a broad range of interesting physical systems. As yet, there is no universally accepted definition of quantum chaos. However, by dealing with such a wide range of topics from different branches of physics, this book provides an overview of this rapidly expanding field, and will be of great interest to graduate students and researchers in many areas of physics and chemistry.
It is a happy situation when similar concepts and theoretical techniques can be applied to widely different physical systems because of a deep similarity in the situations being studied. The book illustrates this well; it focuses on the description of correlations in quantum systems out of equilibrium at very short time scales, prompted by experiments with short laser pulses in semiconductors, and in complex reactions in heavy nuclei. In both cases the experiments are characterized by nonlinear dynamics and by strong correlations out of equilibrium. In some systems there are also important finite-size effects. The book comprises several independent contributions of moderate length, and I sometimes felt that a more intensive effort in cross-coordination of the different contributions could have been of help. It is divided almost equally between theory and experiment. In the theoretical part, there is a thorough discussion both of the kinematic aspects (description of correlations) and the dynamical ones (evaluation of correlations). The experimental part is naturally divided according to the nature of the system: the interaction of pulsed lasers with matter on the one hand, and the correlations in finite-size systems (nanoparticles and nuclei) on the other. There is also a discussion on the dynamics of superconductors, a subject currently of great interest. Although an effort has been made to keep each contribution self-contained, I must admit that reading level is uneven. However, there are a number of thorough and stimulating contributions that make this book a useful introduction to the topic at the level of graduate students or researchers acquainted with quantum statistical mechanics.
The vast majority of the literature dealing with quantum dynamics is concerned with linear evolution of the wave function or the density matrix. A complete dynamical description requires a full understanding of the evolution of measured quantum systems, necessary to explain actual experimental results. The dynamics of such systems is intrinsically nonlinear even at the level of distribution functions, both classically as well as quantum mechanically. Aside from being physically more complete, this treatment reveals the existence of dynamical regimes, such as chaos, that have no counterpart in the linear case. Here, we present a short introductory review of some of these aspects, with a few illustrative results and examples.