Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light

Stanley Jeffers, Sisir Roy, Jean Pierre Vigier, Geoffrey Hunter

Published Jan 1, 1997• 21 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-011-5682-0

Related papers

Present experimental status of the Einstein-de Broglie theory of light

Jean Pierre Vigier

•Jan 1, 1993•14 citations

ON THE “QUANTUM” THEORY OF LIGHT

L. P. Sieg

School Science and Mathematics•Apr 1, 1914•0 citations

Relativistic aspects of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Dennis Dieks, Gerard Nienhuis

It is argued that nonrelativistic quantum mechanics does not in all respects behave as a fully Galilean invariant theory. The difference is empirically significant, as is illustrated by the Sagnac effect. The conclusion of this article sheds some new light on a recent discussion concerning the status of de Broglie’s theory of matter waves.

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1990•35 citations

On the “Quantum” Theory of Light

L. P. Sieg

Scientific American•Jul 18, 1914•1 citation

ON THE “QUANTUM” THEORY OF LIGHT

L. P. Sieg

School Science and Mathematics•Mar 1, 1914•0 citations

Remarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics

Adrian Kent

Recent work with Dowker on the scientific status of the consistent histories approach to quantum theory is reviewed and summarised. The approach is compared with formulations of quantum theory, such as Bohmian mechanics and the Copenhagen interpretation a la Landau-Lifshitz, in which classical variables are explicitly appended. I try to explain why the consistent histories formulation is scientifically problematic, in that it is a very weak theory, but also scientifically interesting, shedding new light on quantum theory.

arXiv:quant-ph/9511032•Nov 22, 1995•0 citations
Recent work with Dowker on the scientific status of the consistent histories approach to quantum theory is reviewed and summarised. The approach is compared with formulations of quantum theory, such as Bohmian mechanics and the Copenhagen interpretation a la Landau-Lifshitz, in which classical variables are explicitly appended. I try to explain why the consistent histories formulation is scientifically problematic, in that it is a very weak theory, but also scientifically interesting, shedding new light on quantum theory.