Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Birkhäuser Basel eBooks

Introduction and Motivation

Masao Nagasawa

Published Jan 1, 1993• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum mechanics was formulated as an abstract algebraic theory (of operator algebras) by Born-Heisenberg-Jordan in 1925–26 based on a successful application to the spectrum of hydrogen atoms. 1 In this theory the so-called “quantization” 2 (commutation relation) These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

DOI
10.1007/978-3-0348-8568-3_1

Related papers

Quantization and the Schrödinger Equation

Floyd L. Williams

The basic equation of quantum mechanics is the Schrödinger equation which expresses the wave function Ψ of a quantum system as an eigenfunction of a quantized Hamiltonian operator H : HΨ = λΨ where the (real) eigenvalue λ is the quantum energy of the system in the state Ψ see equations (1.3.2), (1.3.4). Embodied already in this equation is the basic quantum mechanical principle that quantum energies cannot take on arbitrary values but are quantized : they are given by a discrete set of eigenvalues of a suitable second-order differential operator. This mathematical phenomenon of the discreteness of eigenvalues explains, for example, the observed discreteness of absorption and emission atomic spectral lines; compare remarks in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1. The Schrödinger theory, and the equivalent theory of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, represents a distinct advancement of the Bohr theory. Some early basic papers on quantum mechanics are compiled in the book [82], which includes a historic introduction by B. van der Waerden. Also see [6, 8, 9, 24, 75, 76]. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Progress in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

The Transition Region as Predicted by Quantum Mechanics

Theo van Holten

In the present chapter the connection between quantum mechanics and classical physics is treated, as derived in established quantum theory. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Atlantis Press eBooks•Dec 9, 2016•0 citations

Lecture 2: Pseudo-differential Operators. Berezin, Kohn–Nirenberg, Born–Jordan Quantizations

Gianfausto Dell’Antonio

Weyl quantization is strictly linked to Wigner transform. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Atlantis studies in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Quantum mechanics

Thomas A. Ryckman

Quantum mechanics originated with a paper of 24-year-old Werner Heisenberg in early July 1925 seeking "to establish a quantum-theoretical mechanics based entirely on relations between quantities that are observable in principle". Heisenberg argues that experimental conditions limit simultaneous use of both kinematic and dynamic concepts in the description of an atomic object, complementarity more broadly enjoined an essential limitation in application of classical concepts to the quantum domain. The quantum-to-classical transition argument then targets the purported universality of quantum mechanics, the claim that descriptions of "real states" of macroscopic systems can be recovered as the classical limit of the more fundamental underlying quantum mechanical ones. The looming problem in quantum-to-classical transition is wave-particle duality and in particular the principle of superposition. As quantum mechanics holds that all possible physical information about the state of the individual system is represented by Ψ, the theory must be incomplete. Einstein suggest quantum orthodoxy holds a completely different sense of quantum mechanical completeness.

Routledge eBooks•May 18, 2017•0 citations

The mathematical structure of quantum theory

Keith Hannabuss

Abstract We have already mentioned that Schriöidinger’s formulation of quantum mechanics was slightly preceded by a totally different algebraic formulation proposed by Heisenberg. Although Schriöidinger’s methods were so much simpler that they were generally preferred, both approaches seemed to give the same answers, so it was natural to ask how they were related. This was particularly important because some features of quantum theory were easier to understand in Heisenberg’s formalism. In fact, as we have already noted, Schriöidinger was able to show that the two methods were essentially equivalent. Soon mathematicians like Hermann Weyland John von Neumann were able to find a general mathematical scheme that encompassed both approaches, and it is this that we shall now describe.

•Mar 20, 1997•0 citations

Quantum Theory

Sven Larsson

Toward the end of the nineteenth century, it became clear that some experiments cannot be explained on the basis of known physics, now referred to as classical physics. In 1900, Max Planck was able to correctly describe the distribution of blackbody radiation energy as a function of wavelength λ or frequency ν = c/λ. He had to accept the existence of energy packets (quanta) with energy E = hν. A few years later, Albert Einstein found that this unexpected relation between energy and frequency is also necessary in order to understand photoemission from metallic surfaces. A decade later, Niels Bohr arrived at the correct equation for the electronic spectrum of the hydrogen atom by applying “quantum conditions” on the motion of the electron around the nucleus and the Planck’s relation E = hν on the energy difference between the energy levels (1916). A decade later, Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan introduced “quantum mechanics” and de Broglie and Schrödinger (1925-1926) introduced “wave mechanics.”

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 26, 2012•0 citations
Quantum mechanics was formulated as an abstract algebraic theory (of operator algebras) by Born-Heisenberg-Jordan in 1925–26 based on a successful application to the spectrum of hydrogen atoms. 1 In this theory the so-called “quantization” 2 (commutation relation) These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The basic equation of quantum mechanics is the Schrödinger equation which expresses the wave function Ψ of a quantum system as an eigenfunction of a quantized Hamiltonian operator H : HΨ = λΨ where the (real) eigenvalue λ is the quantum energy of the system in the state Ψ see equations (1.3.2), (1.3.4). Embodied already in this equation is the basic quantum mechanical principle that quantum energies cannot take on arbitrary values but are quantized : they are given by a discrete set of eigenvalues of a suitable second-order differential operator. This mathematical phenomenon of the discreteness of eigenvalues explains, for example, the observed discreteness of absorption and emission atomic spectral lines; compare remarks in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1. The Schrödinger theory, and the equivalent theory of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, represents a distinct advancement of the Bohr theory. Some early basic papers on quantum mechanics are compiled in the book [82], which includes a historic introduction by B. van der Waerden. Also see [6, 8, 9, 24, 75, 76]. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Quantum mechanics originated with a paper of 24-year-old Werner Heisenberg in early July 1925 seeking "to establish a quantum-theoretical mechanics based entirely on relations between quantities that are observable in principle". Heisenberg argues that experimental conditions limit simultaneous use of both kinematic and dynamic concepts in the description of an atomic object, complementarity more broadly enjoined an essential limitation in application of classical concepts to the quantum domain. The quantum-to-classical transition argument then targets the purported universality of quantum mechanics, the claim that descriptions of "real states" of macroscopic systems can be recovered as the classical limit of the more fundamental underlying quantum mechanical ones. The looming problem in quantum-to-classical transition is wave-particle duality and in particular the principle of superposition. As quantum mechanics holds that all possible physical information about the state of the individual system is represented by Ψ, the theory must be incomplete. Einstein suggest quantum orthodoxy holds a completely different sense of quantum mechanical completeness.
Abstract We have already mentioned that Schriöidinger’s formulation of quantum mechanics was slightly preceded by a totally different algebraic formulation proposed by Heisenberg. Although Schriöidinger’s methods were so much simpler that they were generally preferred, both approaches seemed to give the same answers, so it was natural to ask how they were related. This was particularly important because some features of quantum theory were easier to understand in Heisenberg’s formalism. In fact, as we have already noted, Schriöidinger was able to show that the two methods were essentially equivalent. Soon mathematicians like Hermann Weyland John von Neumann were able to find a general mathematical scheme that encompassed both approaches, and it is this that we shall now describe.
Toward the end of the nineteenth century, it became clear that some experiments cannot be explained on the basis of known physics, now referred to as classical physics. In 1900, Max Planck was able to correctly describe the distribution of blackbody radiation energy as a function of wavelength λ or frequency ν = c/λ. He had to accept the existence of energy packets (quanta) with energy E = hν. A few years later, Albert Einstein found that this unexpected relation between energy and frequency is also necessary in order to understand photoemission from metallic surfaces. A decade later, Niels Bohr arrived at the correct equation for the electronic spectrum of the hydrogen atom by applying “quantum conditions” on the motion of the electron around the nucleus and the Planck’s relation E = hν on the energy difference between the energy levels (1916). A decade later, Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan introduced “quantum mechanics” and de Broglie and Schrödinger (1925-1926) introduced “wave mechanics.”