Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science & Education

How Real is the Quantum World?

Marcello Cini

Published Aug 1, 2003• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1025326012905

Related papers

How Real is the Quantum World?

Marcello Cini

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•4 citations

Real World Interpretations of Quantum Theory

Adrian Kent

arXiv:0708.3710•Foundations of Physics•Nov 16, 2011•19 citations

Quantum Mechanics and the Real World

Luis de la Peña, Ana Marı́a Cetto

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Quantum-enhanced sensing in the real world: Multiple parameters & fault tolerance

Animesh Datta

Achieving quantum-enhanced sensing in high-level applications in the real-world has proven to be challenging. High-level applications typically involve the simultaneous quantum sensing of multiple parameters. We highlight some recent advances and open problems in this area. Quantum-enhanced sensing in the real world is incumbent on tackling decoherence. We discuss how fault-tolerant quantum metrology can pave the path for quantumenhanced sensing in the real world.

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II•Feb 25, 2020•1 citation

An Irreducible Quantum Advantage in Aligning World Models with Reality

Josep Lumbreras, Hailan Ma, Jayne Thompson +1 more

World models provide digital simulacra of the true world, allowing agents to be trained and tested before costly real-world deployment. At each time step, they receive an action and generate an observation and reward matching the statistics of the true world. In complex environments where present outcomes depend on events far in the past, this requires memory. One might expect that, by increasing memory, we can always build a model accurately enough to align the optimal agent policies of the real and virtual worlds. We show that this is false for classical world models, even when the true world itself is classical. We construct true worlds for which every finite classical model fails along the same possible trajectory: it either loses the ability to distinguish actions when the true world clearly prefers one, or repeatedly assigns the highest expected reward to suboptimal actions. Its expected-reward estimates also retain a nonvanishing average error. In contrast, each such true world admits a quantum world model using a single qutrit that reproduces it exactly: its reward estimates and preferred actions always match those of the true world, ensuring that the optimal policies of the real and virtual worlds remain perfectly aligned.

quant-pharXiv:2608.19779•Aug 21, 2026•0 citations

Quantum reality is real

Aleksandar Perisic

•May 2, 2010•0 citations
World models provide digital simulacra of the true world, allowing agents to be trained and tested before costly real-world deployment. At each time step, they receive an action and generate an observation and reward matching the statistics of the true world. In complex environments where present outcomes depend on events far in the past, this requires memory. One might expect that, by increasing memory, we can always build a model accurately enough to align the optimal agent policies of the real and virtual worlds. We show that this is false for classical world models, even when the true world itself is classical. We construct true worlds for which every finite classical model fails along the same possible trajectory: it either loses the ability to distinguish actions when the true world clearly prefers one, or repeatedly assigns the highest expected reward to suboptimal actions. Its expected-reward estimates also retain a nonvanishing average error. In contrast, each such true world admits a quantum world model using a single qutrit that reproduces it exactly: its reward estimates and preferred actions always match those of the true world, ensuring that the optimal policies of the real and virtual worlds remain perfectly aligned.