Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

- Introduction

Janik Wolters

Published Aug 20, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The two preceding quotations of Schro¨dinger and Pauli from the first half of the 20th century might suggest the opposite, but it is in fact research on individual quantum objects and on semiconductors which has seen tremendous progress in the last decades. Single quantum systems are not anymore only a theoretical concept that is applied in Gedanken experiments, but single atoms, ions, photons, or individual solid state quantum systems are frequently used in many real-world experiments.

DOI
10.1201/b18858-4

Related papers

Experiments: quantum reduction seen in real time

Franck Laloë

From a fundamental point of view we must acknowledge that, since about 1935, our conceptual understanding of quantum mechanics has not progressed so much. Really new ideas are few and far between – except of course the major line initiated by the contribution of Bell [6]. This is in big contrast with the rest of physics, where new theoretical and experimental discoveries in many fields have flourished, very often with the help of the tools of quantum mechanics. The fantastic evolution of the experimental techniques has completely changed the situation. At the beginning of quantum mechanics, the observation of the tracks of single particles in Wilson chambers [348] played the essential role in the introduction of the postulate of state vector reduction, but otherwise it was impossible to observe continuously a single electron, atom, or ion; the experiments that theorists were proposing in discussions on the principles of quantum measurement were therefore “thought experiments” (“Gedanken Experiment”), as for instance in the famous Solvay meetings [1, 21]. But nowadays, after almost of century of experimental progress, experiments that were then unthinkable have become a reality. A huge number of contemporary experiments involves the laws of quantum mechanics in general; several books would not be sufficient to describe all of them. Nevertheless, in the majority of experiments, what is really observed is the sum over a very large number of particles of one individual microscopic observable (sum of atomic dipoles for instance), which is accurately described by the average value of this observable.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 30, 2012•0 citations

Historical introduction: photons and measurements using photons

Vladimir B. Braginsky, Farid Ya Khalili, Kip S. Thorne

In the standard, textbook treatment of quantum mechanics, the contact with experiment is described in terms of probabilities for obtaining this, that, or another result, when identical experiments are performed on a huge number ( ensemble ) of identical objects. Such an ensemble description was adequate during the first half century of quantum theory, because the technology of that era was incapable of making a measurement without destroying or severely changing the measured object (photon, atom, …). In recent years, however, advances in technology and technique have made possible repetitive quantum measurements on a single quantum object, with each measurement influencing the object only minimally. Such measurements cannot be analyzed using solely the ensemble theory. Additional theoretical concepts are needed. The purpose of this book is to describe the methods and theory of such measurements (as well as the more elementary theory of ensembles of measurements). This book is written for two types of readers: those who have had only a little previous contact with quantum mechanics, and those who have had much. Readers of the first type are presumed to understand atomic physics at a qualitative level. The unstarred sections of this book offer such readers an overview of the present state-of-the-art of quantum measurements on single objects and prospects for the future, as well as an elementary overview of the theory of such measurements.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 24, 1992•1 citation

Single Atoms: Controlling the Quantum World

Dieter Meschede

Single Atoms: Controlling the Quantum WorldAtoms and photons are the principal cases of microscopic particles, the hallmarks of quantum objects. For more than a century they have served as conceptual models to understand and investigate the microscopic structure of matter. More than 30 years ago it became possible to isolate and observe single ions in a trapping device. This experiment may be taken as a turning point in the history of approaching the quantum world: experimenters left the rol...

L’annuaire du Collège de France•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Quantum simulation ‐ an exciting adventure

R. Blatt, Immanuel Bloch, J. I. Cirac +1 more

Quantum many-body systems, as they appear in different branches of physics and chemistry, are very hard to simulate. The number of parameters defining their quantum states grows exponentially with the number of constituents. This prevents us from exploring and investigating relevant problems involving relatively small numbers of subsystems even with the help of the most powerful supercomputers. Richard Feynman already noticed this difficulty back in 1981 when he wrote his visionary paper “Simulating Physics with Computers” [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21:6/7, 467 (1982)]. There, he proposed to use quantum systems (as opposed to classical computers) to perform the simulation and in this way to circumvent the need to store and compute a colossal number of parameters, necessary to describe the pertaining superpositions. What was a visionary idea at that time has become a very active field of research in the last few years. The extraordinary progress of both theoretical and experimental research in quantum physics allows us now to tame, control, and manipulate various quantum systems with unprecedented precision. Laser, magnetic, electronic and other technologies enable us to arrange quantum subsystems in different geometries, modify their interactions, and detect them. This allows us to engineer Hamiltonians and emulate systems displaying some of the most intriguing quantum phenomena. This tremendous progress is, to a large extent, due to the pioneering work of many researchers during the last twenty to thirty years. Here, the investigations of basic phenomena with one or few atoms or photons were of particular impact. The degree of control achieved in the experiments has enabled the observation of mind-boggling quantum effects, related to the superposition principle or to entangled states, and their disappearance due to decoherence. In fact, the 2012 Nobel Prize has been awarded to two scientists, S. Haroche and D. Wineland, for such ground-breaking experiments. Such experiments, often in combination with laser cooling of atoms or ions and Bose-Einstein condensation, have formed one of the pillars on which the field of quantum simulations is being established. Quantum simulations with cold atoms, either in magnetic traps or in optical lattices, with trapped ions, with photons, with superconducting devices, with quantum dots, etc., have been theoretically proposed and experimentally considered by many researchers. Most of the proposals so far deal with problems in condensed matter physics that are either difficult to tackle with modern supercomputers or are difficult to observe in solid state systems. This has established a very close link between different disciplines, like atomic, molecular, and optical (AMO) physics, and condensed matter physics. Although some of the experiments are still in their infancy, and a lot of research is still needed, the extraordinary progress made in all these research areas during the last few years makes us feel confident that in the not too distant future quantum simulators will provide a key tool to investigate many-body quantum systems. Furthermore, we also expect that quantum simulators will help quantum physicists to establish new and fruitful links to other scientific communities, like high-energy physics or quantum chemistry. The present special issue contains various review papers as well as research papers on quantum simulations. It starts out with two papers written by last year's Nobel Prize winners describing their foundational work (Wineland, p. 739 and Haroche, p. 763). The issue continues with three thorough, invited review papers covering different topics on quantum simulations. The first one reviews recent theoretical proposals to use cold atoms in optical lattices to simulate lattice gauge theories of the sort that appear in high-energy physics (U.-J. Wiese, p. 783). The second covers both theoretical proposals and experimental demonstrations of cold-atom systems to simulate the physics of matter in the presence of gauge fields, displaying so-called topological phenomena, which so far have only been observed in solid-state systems (I. Spielman, p. 794). The third one contains an extensive overview and new proposals to perform a broad range of quantum simulations using quantum dot systems (P. Barthelmy et al., p. 813). The issue also includes six original papers with a variety of theoretical proposals as well as the introduction of novel theoretical techniques related to the field of quantum simulation. The field of quantum simulations is just starting, but we are confident that it will soon generate an even larger plethora of new ideas and discoveries, trigger interdisciplinary research, and lead us to the adventure of describing and understanding the quantum world. We hope that this special issue will help future researchers in such an exciting adventure. Rainer Blatt received his PhD degree in physics from the University of Mainz in 1981. As a postdoctoral fellow he worked on atomic beam cooling in Boulder, CO and later as a research assistant in Hamburg with single trapped ions. In 1995 he accepted a chair in experimental physics at the University of Innsbruck working on quantum information processing with trapped ions. Since 2003 he is also scientific director at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. Immanuel Bloch received his PhD degree in physics from the Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich in 2000. As a junior group leader, he continued in Munich starting his work on ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices. In 2008 he was appointed scientific director of the newly founded division on Quantum Many-Body Systems at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics. Since 2009 he also holds a chair in quantum optics at the Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich. Ignacio Cirac received his PhD degree in physics from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid in 1991. He was professor at the Universities of Castilla-La Mancha and Innsbruck from 1991–1996 and 1996–2001, respectively. In 2001 he joined the Max-Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, where he leads the Theory Division. His current research interests include quantum information theory and quantum optics. Peter Zoller obtained his doctorate from the University of Innsbruck in 1977. He was Max Kade Fellow at the University of Southern California from 1978/79, and was JILA visiting Fellow 1981/82 and 1988. In 1990 he became JILA Fellow and professor of physics at the University of Colorado. At the end of 1994, he accepted a chair at the University of Innsbruck, where he has worked ever since. Since 2003, he has also held the position of Scientific Director at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

Annalen der Physik•Nov 1, 2013•3 citations

Introduction

Muhammad Waseem, Faizan-e-Ilahi, Muhammad Sabieh Anwar

This chapter serves as a motivation towards quantum mechanics experiments using single photons. It surveys key experiments which have in the last two decades been recreated using modern optical setups and single photon detectors. The content of the subsequent chapters is also signposted.

Institute of Physics eBooks•Jul 1, 2020•0 citations

Dalla matematizzazione dell'economia neoclassica alla fisica quantistica nei processi cognitivi. Certezze e crisi dell?idea di razionalit�: dall?homo oeconomicus ai modelli quantistici della mente

Franco Vaio

The origin of the idea of rationality as a fundamental model of human behaviour (the concept of homo oeconomicus) that was introduced during the neoclassical revolution in economics and that implied the mathematization of economics thereby adopting the mathematical scheme of and borrowing some fundamental conception from classical mechanics, as well as the crisis of this rationality model that followed in the latest decades are here discussed. The origin of the least action principle in 18th century is first described. The least action principle was the basis that lead to the development of Lagrangean dynamics in classical mechanics that, on its turn, entered economics in 19th century as a fundamental method to describe the behaviour of a postulated rational agent and was the basis for the development of mainstream economics in 20th century. The epistemologically unjustified transfer of concepts from mechanics, in particular in Walras? work, is stressed. In the second half of 20th century experimental psychology slowly entered economics and several paradoxes in the real agents? choices were shown giving strong evidence of rationality?s axioms violation in the real behaviour of people. By mid-20th century, quantum mechanics had already developed a highly effective mathematical apparatus to describe the wave-particle behaviour of quantum objects and in particular the phenomenon of probability interference that is clearly shown in the double-slit experiment with single electrons, as well as with photons. Probability interference is peculiar to quantum mechanics and is extraneous to the Kolmogorov axiomatic theory of classical probability. The recent idea of applying the quantum mechanics concepts and formalism, including quantum probability interference and superposition of states, to the description of mental processes is discussed. The aim of this new field of research, which is developing along the lines of the centuries-old question of the mind-body relation, is to create a general framework where cognition might be modeled. Quantum cognition is therefore introduced as a possible answer to the rationality violation paradoxes shown by experiments on ambiguous figures recognition and on the effects brought about by conjunction and disjunction of concepts.

•Apr 4, 2014•0 citations
The two preceding quotations of Schro¨dinger and Pauli from the first half of the 20th century might suggest the opposite, but it is in fact research on individual quantum objects and on semiconductors which has seen tremendous progress in the last decades. Single quantum systems are not anymore only a theoretical concept that is applied in Gedanken experiments, but single atoms, ions, photons, or individual solid state quantum systems are frequently used in many real-world experiments.
From a fundamental point of view we must acknowledge that, since about 1935, our conceptual understanding of quantum mechanics has not progressed so much. Really new ideas are few and far between – except of course the major line initiated by the contribution of Bell [6]. This is in big contrast with the rest of physics, where new theoretical and experimental discoveries in many fields have flourished, very often with the help of the tools of quantum mechanics. The fantastic evolution of the experimental techniques has completely changed the situation. At the beginning of quantum mechanics, the observation of the tracks of single particles in Wilson chambers [348] played the essential role in the introduction of the postulate of state vector reduction, but otherwise it was impossible to observe continuously a single electron, atom, or ion; the experiments that theorists were proposing in discussions on the principles of quantum measurement were therefore “thought experiments” (“Gedanken Experiment”), as for instance in the famous Solvay meetings [1, 21]. But nowadays, after almost of century of experimental progress, experiments that were then unthinkable have become a reality. A huge number of contemporary experiments involves the laws of quantum mechanics in general; several books would not be sufficient to describe all of them. Nevertheless, in the majority of experiments, what is really observed is the sum over a very large number of particles of one individual microscopic observable (sum of atomic dipoles for instance), which is accurately described by the average value of this observable.
In the standard, textbook treatment of quantum mechanics, the contact with experiment is described in terms of probabilities for obtaining this, that, or another result, when identical experiments are performed on a huge number ( ensemble ) of identical objects. Such an ensemble description was adequate during the first half century of quantum theory, because the technology of that era was incapable of making a measurement without destroying or severely changing the measured object (photon, atom, …). In recent years, however, advances in technology and technique have made possible repetitive quantum measurements on a single quantum object, with each measurement influencing the object only minimally. Such measurements cannot be analyzed using solely the ensemble theory. Additional theoretical concepts are needed. The purpose of this book is to describe the methods and theory of such measurements (as well as the more elementary theory of ensembles of measurements). This book is written for two types of readers: those who have had only a little previous contact with quantum mechanics, and those who have had much. Readers of the first type are presumed to understand atomic physics at a qualitative level. The unstarred sections of this book offer such readers an overview of the present state-of-the-art of quantum measurements on single objects and prospects for the future, as well as an elementary overview of the theory of such measurements.
Quantum many-body systems, as they appear in different branches of physics and chemistry, are very hard to simulate. The number of parameters defining their quantum states grows exponentially with the number of constituents. This prevents us from exploring and investigating relevant problems involving relatively small numbers of subsystems even with the help of the most powerful supercomputers. Richard Feynman already noticed this difficulty back in 1981 when he wrote his visionary paper “Simulating Physics with Computers” [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21:6/7, 467 (1982)]. There, he proposed to use quantum systems (as opposed to classical computers) to perform the simulation and in this way to circumvent the need to store and compute a colossal number of parameters, necessary to describe the pertaining superpositions. What was a visionary idea at that time has become a very active field of research in the last few years. The extraordinary progress of both theoretical and experimental research in quantum physics allows us now to tame, control, and manipulate various quantum systems with unprecedented precision. Laser, magnetic, electronic and other technologies enable us to arrange quantum subsystems in different geometries, modify their interactions, and detect them. This allows us to engineer Hamiltonians and emulate systems displaying some of the most intriguing quantum phenomena. This tremendous progress is, to a large extent, due to the pioneering work of many researchers during the last twenty to thirty years. Here, the investigations of basic phenomena with one or few atoms or photons were of particular impact. The degree of control achieved in the experiments has enabled the observation of mind-boggling quantum effects, related to the superposition principle or to entangled states, and their disappearance due to decoherence. In fact, the 2012 Nobel Prize has been awarded to two scientists, S. Haroche and D. Wineland, for such ground-breaking experiments. Such experiments, often in combination with laser cooling of atoms or ions and Bose-Einstein condensation, have formed one of the pillars on which the field of quantum simulations is being established. Quantum simulations with cold atoms, either in magnetic traps or in optical lattices, with trapped ions, with photons, with superconducting devices, with quantum dots, etc., have been theoretically proposed and experimentally considered by many researchers. Most of the proposals so far deal with problems in condensed matter physics that are either difficult to tackle with modern supercomputers or are difficult to observe in solid state systems. This has established a very close link between different disciplines, like atomic, molecular, and optical (AMO) physics, and condensed matter physics. Although some of the experiments are still in their infancy, and a lot of research is still needed, the extraordinary progress made in all these research areas during the last few years makes us feel confident that in the not too distant future quantum simulators will provide a key tool to investigate many-body quantum systems. Furthermore, we also expect that quantum simulators will help quantum physicists to establish new and fruitful links to other scientific communities, like high-energy physics or quantum chemistry. The present special issue contains various review papers as well as research papers on quantum simulations. It starts out with two papers written by last year's Nobel Prize winners describing their foundational work (Wineland, p. 739 and Haroche, p. 763). The issue continues with three thorough, invited review papers covering different topics on quantum simulations. The first one reviews recent theoretical proposals to use cold atoms in optical lattices to simulate lattice gauge theories of the sort that appear in high-energy physics (U.-J. Wiese, p. 783). The second covers both theoretical proposals and experimental demonstrations of cold-atom systems to simulate the physics of matter in the presence of gauge fields, displaying so-called topological phenomena, which so far have only been observed in solid-state systems (I. Spielman, p. 794). The third one contains an extensive overview and new proposals to perform a broad range of quantum simulations using quantum dot systems (P. Barthelmy et al., p. 813). The issue also includes six original papers with a variety of theoretical proposals as well as the introduction of novel theoretical techniques related to the field of quantum simulation. The field of quantum simulations is just starting, but we are confident that it will soon generate an even larger plethora of new ideas and discoveries, trigger interdisciplinary research, and lead us to the adventure of describing and understanding the quantum world. We hope that this special issue will help future researchers in such an exciting adventure. Rainer Blatt received his PhD degree in physics from the University of Mainz in 1981. As a postdoctoral fellow he worked on atomic beam cooling in Boulder, CO and later as a research assistant in Hamburg with single trapped ions. In 1995 he accepted a chair in experimental physics at the University of Innsbruck working on quantum information processing with trapped ions. Since 2003 he is also scientific director at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. Immanuel Bloch received his PhD degree in physics from the Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich in 2000. As a junior group leader, he continued in Munich starting his work on ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices. In 2008 he was appointed scientific director of the newly founded division on Quantum Many-Body Systems at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics. Since 2009 he also holds a chair in quantum optics at the Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich. Ignacio Cirac received his PhD degree in physics from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid in 1991. He was professor at the Universities of Castilla-La Mancha and Innsbruck from 1991–1996 and 1996–2001, respectively. In 2001 he joined the Max-Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, where he leads the Theory Division. His current research interests include quantum information theory and quantum optics. Peter Zoller obtained his doctorate from the University of Innsbruck in 1977. He was Max Kade Fellow at the University of Southern California from 1978/79, and was JILA visiting Fellow 1981/82 and 1988. In 1990 he became JILA Fellow and professor of physics at the University of Colorado. At the end of 1994, he accepted a chair at the University of Innsbruck, where he has worked ever since. Since 2003, he has also held the position of Scientific Director at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
The origin of the idea of rationality as a fundamental model of human behaviour (the concept of homo oeconomicus) that was introduced during the neoclassical revolution in economics and that implied the mathematization of economics thereby adopting the mathematical scheme of and borrowing some fundamental conception from classical mechanics, as well as the crisis of this rationality model that followed in the latest decades are here discussed. The origin of the least action principle in 18th century is first described. The least action principle was the basis that lead to the development of Lagrangean dynamics in classical mechanics that, on its turn, entered economics in 19th century as a fundamental method to describe the behaviour of a postulated rational agent and was the basis for the development of mainstream economics in 20th century. The epistemologically unjustified transfer of concepts from mechanics, in particular in Walras? work, is stressed. In the second half of 20th century experimental psychology slowly entered economics and several paradoxes in the real agents? choices were shown giving strong evidence of rationality?s axioms violation in the real behaviour of people. By mid-20th century, quantum mechanics had already developed a highly effective mathematical apparatus to describe the wave-particle behaviour of quantum objects and in particular the phenomenon of probability interference that is clearly shown in the double-slit experiment with single electrons, as well as with photons. Probability interference is peculiar to quantum mechanics and is extraneous to the Kolmogorov axiomatic theory of classical probability. The recent idea of applying the quantum mechanics concepts and formalism, including quantum probability interference and superposition of states, to the description of mental processes is discussed. The aim of this new field of research, which is developing along the lines of the centuries-old question of the mind-body relation, is to create a general framework where cognition might be modeled. Quantum cognition is therefore introduced as a possible answer to the rationality violation paradoxes shown by experiments on ambiguous figures recognition and on the effects brought about by conjunction and disjunction of concepts.