Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Entanglement Manipulation

Mark M. Wilde

Published Nov 2, 2016• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/9781316809976.022

Related papers

ENTANGLEMENT MANIPULATION

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Apr 20, 2020•0 citations

One-Shot Rates for Entanglement Manipulation Under Non-entangling Maps

Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Nilanjana Datta

We obtain expressions for the optimal rates of one-shot entanglement manipulation under operations which generate a negligible amount of entanglement. As the optimal rates for entanglement distillation and dilution in this paradigm, we obtain the max- and min-relative entropies of entanglement, the two logarithmic robustnesses of entanglement, and smoothed versions thereof. This gives a new operational meaning to these entanglement measures. Moreover, by considering the limit of many identical copies of the shared entangled state, we partially recover the recently found reversibility of entanglement manipulation under the class of operations which asymptotically do not generate entanglement.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Feb 18, 2011•118 citations

Entanglement manipulation and magic area-laws

Rafael A. Macedo, Rafael Chaves

Physical many-body quantum systems typically interact locally, giving rise to ground states where entanglement grows with the area of the region being probed. Beyond entanglement, non-stabilizerness (or "magic") has been established as another crucial resource linked to quantum complexity and the properties of error-correcting states. Unlike entanglement, non-stabilizerness typically behaves with a volume-law scaling in ground states, indicating inherent computational complexity. In this work, we show that under a recent classification of quantum states, area-law states split into two distinct classes. Entanglement-dominated states obey an area-law for non-stabilizerness and admit efficient quantum algorithms for entanglement manipulation. Conversely, magic-dominated states exhibit a a faster-than-area growth of subsystem non-stabilizerness and require non-efficient algorithms for entanglement manipulation tasks. Within this context, we introduce the concept of the stabilizer regime, a restricted quantum phase that admits efficient entanglement manipulation and hosts area laws for both magic and entanglement.

quant-pharXiv:2610.08727•Oct 7, 2026•0 citations

Tunable Entanglement

Seiji Armstrong

Nature Photonics•Jul 31, 2012•0 citations

Entanglement manipulation and concentration

Rob Thew

We introduce a simple, experimentally realizable, entanglement manipulation protocol for exploring mixed-state entanglement. We show that for both nonmaximally entangled pure, and mixed polarization-entangled two-qubit states, an increase in the degree of entanglement and purity, is achievable.

arXiv:quant-ph/0012049•Physical Review A•Feb 1, 2001•42 citations

Entanglement and it’s Manipulation

B. G. Sidharth, Abhishek Das

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jun 19, 2019•1 citation
We obtain expressions for the optimal rates of one-shot entanglement manipulation under operations which generate a negligible amount of entanglement. As the optimal rates for entanglement distillation and dilution in this paradigm, we obtain the max- and min-relative entropies of entanglement, the two logarithmic robustnesses of entanglement, and smoothed versions thereof. This gives a new operational meaning to these entanglement measures. Moreover, by considering the limit of many identical copies of the shared entangled state, we partially recover the recently found reversibility of entanglement manipulation under the class of operations which asymptotically do not generate entanglement.
Physical many-body quantum systems typically interact locally, giving rise to ground states where entanglement grows with the area of the region being probed. Beyond entanglement, non-stabilizerness (or "magic") has been established as another crucial resource linked to quantum complexity and the properties of error-correcting states. Unlike entanglement, non-stabilizerness typically behaves with a volume-law scaling in ground states, indicating inherent computational complexity. In this work, we show that under a recent classification of quantum states, area-law states split into two distinct classes. Entanglement-dominated states obey an area-law for non-stabilizerness and admit efficient quantum algorithms for entanglement manipulation. Conversely, magic-dominated states exhibit a a faster-than-area growth of subsystem non-stabilizerness and require non-efficient algorithms for entanglement manipulation tasks. Within this context, we introduce the concept of the stabilizer regime, a restricted quantum phase that admits efficient entanglement manipulation and hosts area laws for both magic and entanglement.