CRC Press eBooks

Matrix Representations

Şaki̇r Erkoç

Published Jul 28, 2006• 0 citations

Abstract

A complete description of the state of a dynamical system is provided by the wave function ψ ( r 1 , r 2 , ⋯) for the state. There are various ways of representing the wave function and hence the state. To discuss these representations let us choose a complete orthonormal set of functions u j ( r 1 , r 2 , ⋯); these satisfy the equations

DOI: 10.1201/9781584887331-11

Related papers

Quantum mechanical density matrix

J. W. Halleý

For systems which obey quantum mechanics, the formulation of the problem of treating large numbers of particles is, of course, somewhat different than it is for classical systems. The microscopic description of the system is provided by a wave function which (in the absence of spin) is a function of the classical coordinates { q i }. The mathematical model is provided by a Hamiltonian operator H which is often obtained from the corresponding classical Hamiltonian by the replacement p i → ( ħ /i)(∂/∂ q i ). In other cases the form of the Hamiltonian operator is simply postulated. The microscopic dynamics are provided by the Schrödinger equation i ħ (∂Ψ/∂ t ) = H Ψ which requires as initial condition the knowledge of the wave function Ψ({ q i }, t ) at some initial time t 0 . (Boundary conditions on Ψ({ q i }, t ) must be specified as part of the description of the model as well.) The results of experiments in quantum mechanics are characterized by operators, usually obtained, like the Hamiltonian, from their classical forms and termed observables. Operators associated with observables must be Hermitian. In general, the various operators corresponding to observables do not commute with one another. It is possible to find sets of commuting operators whose mutual eigenstates span the Hilbert space in which the wave function is confined by the Schrödinger equation and the boundary conditions. A set of such (time independent) eigenstates, termed ψ ν ( q ), is a basis for the Hilbert space.

Cambridge University Press eBooksNov 16, 20060 citations

APPROXIMATION METHODS

Vishnu S. Mathur, Surendra Singh

We have seen that to determine the possible energies En (energy eigenvalues) which a physical system can have and the corresponding eigenfunctions (wave functions) ψn, we have to set up and solve the time-independent Schro¨dinger equation Hψn = Enψn . (8.1.1) In this equation, the wave function ψn, representing the n-th eigenstate of the system in the coordinate representation, is a function of the continuously varying eigenvalues of the position observables of the system, the number of position observables being equal to number of degrees of freedom of the system. The Hamiltonian operator H, in the coordinate representation, is a differential operator involving the continuously varying eigenvalues of the position observables and the derivatives with respect to them. Since we will be dealing with the operators mostly in the coordinate representation, we shall denote them without the caret.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooksDec 12, 20081 citation

Representations and Dynamics

Eric R. Bittner

In this chapter we shall examine different ways in which one can represent the evolution of a quantum state. While mathematically different, the various representations are equivalent in that, at the end of the day, one obtains the same physical prediction. This is good because physics and physical measurements should not depend upon how one chooses to represent the quantum state. Depending upon the problem at hand, each representation has its unique advantages and disadvantages.

CRC Press eBooksJul 21, 20090 citations

Representation Theory

Nandita Rudra

In the first course of quantum mechanics one defines a wavefunction ψ α ( ξ, t ) to describe the state of the system. ψ α ( ξ . t ) is a function of the coordinates ξ at a particular instant of time t . The parameters α denote the quantum numbers of the physical quantities having well-defined values which describe the state ψ .

CRC Press eBooksAug 19, 20190 citations

Dirac Bra-Ket Notation

Z. Ficek

Dirac introduced a very useful notation of state vectors Ψ i in terms of "bra" vectors. This notation allows to make the formal expressions of quantum physics more transparent and easier to manipulate. The bra-ket notation extends to action of operators on state vectors. The projection operator and the completeness relation are very important quantities in quantum physics. They are very useful in calculations and are often employed to represent an arbitrary operator and a wave function (state) in terms of orthonormal states. To illustrate the procedure of representations, this chapter considers an arbitrary operator Â and shows how to represent the operator in terms of projection operators of known orthonormal states. The example in the chapter illustrates the concept of orthonormal states. It presents the application of the completeness relation. Using the completeness relation, that matrix elements of the product operator in the same orthonormal basis can be found from the multiplication of the matrix elements.

Mar 3, 20170 citations

Analytical Representation of General Spin

Takao Yamamoto

The spin operators and their eigenstates are usu:tlly represented by matrices.But it is also pos.sible to represent them analytically in several ways.I) An interesting example is shown as follows.The spin operators are assumed to be the following dif• ferential operators of the two real variables u and v J.,=1/2(uv--fJ2/8u8v), J y=z/2 (v.8/8u-u.8/8v) , Jz=I/4(U2_82/8u2_V2+82/8v2) ,

Progress of Theoretical PhysicsNov 1, 19530 citations