The error rates of quantum devices are orders of magnitude higher than what is needed to run most quantum applications. To close this gap, Quantum Error Correction (QEC) encodes logical qubits and distributes information using several physical qubits. By periodically executing a syndrome extraction circuit on the logical qubits, information about errors (called syndrome) is extracted while running programs. A decoder uses these syndromes to identify and correct errors in real time, which is necessary to prevent accumulation of errors. Unfortunately, software decoders are slow and hardware decoders are fast but less accurate. Thus, almost all QEC studies so far have relied on offline decoding.
The error rates of quantum devices are orders of magnitude higher than what is needed to run most quantum applications. To close this gap, Quantum Error Correction (QEC) encodes logical qubits and distributes information using several physical qubits. By periodically executing a syndrome extraction circuit on the logical qubits, information about errors (called syndrome) is extracted while running programs. A decoder uses these syndromes to identify and correct errors in real time, which is necessary to prevent accumulation of errors. Unfortunately, software decoders are slow and hardware decoders are fast but less accurate. Thus, almost all QEC studies so far have relied on offline decoding.
The error rates of quantum devices are orders of magnitude higher than what is needed to run most quantum applications. To close this gap, Quantum Error Correction (QEC) encodes logical qubits and distributes information using several physical qubits. By periodically executing a syndrome extraction circuit on the logical qubits, information about errors (called syndrome) is extracted while running programs. A decoder uses these syndromes to identify and correct errors in real time, which is required to use feedback implemented in quantum algorithms. Unfortunately, software decoders are slow and hardware decoders are fast but less accurate. Thus, almost all QEC studies so far have relied on offline decoding. To enable real-time decoding in near-term QEC, we propose LILLIPUT-- a Lightweight Low Latency Look-Up Table decoder. LILLIPUT consists of two parts-- First, it translates syndromes into error detection events that index into a Look-Up Table (LUT) whose entry provides the error information in real-time. Second, it programs the LUTs with error assignments for all possible error events by running a software decoder offline. LILLIPUT tolerates an error on any operation in the quantum hardware, including gates and measurement, and the number of tolerated errors grows with the size of the code. It needs <7% logic on off-the-shelf FPGAs that allows it to be easily integrated alongside the control and readout circuits in existing systems. LILLIPUT incurs a latency of few nanoseconds and enables real-time decoding. We also propose Compressed LUTs (CLUTs) to reduce the memory needed by LILLIPUT. By exploiting the fact that not all error events are equally likely and only storing data for the most probable error events, CLUTs reduce the memory needed by up-to 107x (from 148 MB to 1.38 MB) without degrading accuracy.
Quantum computers can solve selected problems more efficiently than classical computers, but current devices are limited by high physical error rates. Quantum Error Correction (QEC) mitigates this by encoding many physical qubits into a logical qubit, with the surface code among the most widely studied approaches. Since syndrome measurements are produced continuously, the decoder must process them fast enough to avoid becoming a system bottleneck, making real-time decoding essential for fault-tolerant quantum computing. While most state-of-the-art real-time decoders rely on Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM), we instead use a high-accuracy Graph Neural Network (GNN) that trades higher computational cost for lower logical error rates. To make this GNN practical for real-time decoding, we apply algorithm-hardware co-design. We reduce complexity through hardware-guided pruning and retraining, producing two hardware-friendly models that reduce parameter count by 3.1× and 6.5×. These target, respectively, an average decoding latency of one syndrome cycle and a worst-case latency within one syndrome cycle. We further reduce hardware cost using input-graph filtering and post-training quantization. Based on these optimized models, we propose an FPGA-based architecture for low-latency inference and real-time decoding. Evaluated on surface codes up to distance 7 under circuit-level noise at physical error rate p=10−3, our decoder outperforms MWPM in decoding accuracy for both average-latency and max-latency settings. It reduces logical error rate by 40% at 1μs average latency, and by 13% under a strict 1μs deadline.
Quantum devices suffer from high error rates, which makes them ineffective for running practical applications. Quantum computers can be made fault tolerant using Quantum Error Correction (QEC), which protects quantum information by encoding logical qubits using data qubits and parity qubits. The data qubits collectively store the quantum information and the parity qubits are measured periodically to produce a syndrome, which is decoded by a classical decoder to identify the location and type of errors. To prevent errors from accumulating and causing a logical error, decoders must accurately identify errors in real-time, necessitating the use of hardware solutions because software decoders are slow. Ideally, a real-time decoder must match the performance of the Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) decoder. However, due to the complexity of the underlying Blossom algorithm, state-of-the-art real-time decoders either use lookup tables, which are not scalable, or use approximate decoding, which significantly increases logical error rates.
Quantum computing researchers in academia and industry have demonstrated increasingly sophisticated experiments that incorporate quantum error correction (QEC) to improve the reliability of logical computations [1]–[4]. Error correction preserves quantum information by encoding logical qubits which are subject to lower error rates than their constituent physical qubits. The degree of error suppression depends on the choice of error-correcting code and distance, the underlying physical error rate, and the accuracy of the decoder. It is widely regarded that QEC is necessary to reach the low error rates required to perform reliable quantum algorithms on large-scale quantum devices. In this poster, we describe our real-time, lowlatency QEC accelerator, Deltaflow 2, which is designed as a modular sub-system that connects to a quantum control system using a universal interface. Deltaflow 2 contains a high-accuracy decoder, and enables streaming quantum memory experiments with wide applicability to a range of different qubit platforms. In addition, we address a gap in the current landscape of opensource quantum software, demonstrating tools for compilation, simulation and decoding of error-corrected quantum circuits using our python library, Deltakit. Together, these tools deliver a comprehensive QEC stack for implementing error correction on quantum hardware.
Quantum error correction (QEC) is transitioning from physical feasibility demonstrations to systems engineering challenges. Google has achieved below-threshold performance on distance-5/7 surface codes, while Riverlane and Rigetti have demonstrated hardware-integrated low-latency feedback loops. These milestones indicate that the core challenge of real-time decoding has shifted from algorithmic capability to system-level engineering. However, a substantial engineering gap remains between laboratory demonstrations and scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC). This white paper addresses three questions: (1) Where are the real bottlenecks in real-time QEC: beyond average decoder speed, the constraints lie in QEC round time, tail latency, and end-to-end data path coordination; (2) How mature are mainstream decoder algorithms: we benchmark the major decoders for both surface codes and quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes, evaluating their real-time readiness; (3) What system stack do we propose: a six-layer reference architecture from syndrome acquisition to logical operations, with interface definitions and latency budget models. Our results quantify the gap between current decoder performance and real-time requirements, and identify the architectural choices needed to close it.
Noise-induced errors in quantum information processing corrupt computation and cause useful algorithms to fail. Quantum ErrorCorrection (QEC) counteracts this by encoding a single logical qubit across many physical qubits and correcting errors through repeatedsyndrome measurements. The Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) decoder is the accuracy benchmark for surface-codedecoding, but its microsecond-scale latency can consume the entire QEC cycle time of superconducting processors, leaving almost nomargin for other control operations. Pre-decoded lookup tables reduce latency to the nanosecond scale, but their memory requirementsgrow exponentially with code size, limiting them to very small code distances. In this work, we demonstrate a single-level cache,implemented as a software prototype, that accelerates decoding by exploiting the repetitive nature of surface-code syndromes. Hitrates above 80% are achieved for code distances up to 9 at below-threshold noise rates, and effective decoding speedups of up to18.1 times over PyMatching’s standalone decoding time are observed at code distance ≥ 5. Cache lookup latency remains below 400nanoseconds in the worst case, with memory well below that of full lookup tables. We further develop a mathematical frameworkdefining the theoretical limits of any cache-based decoder.