Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Fault-tolerant Quantum Private Comparison Protocol

Min Xiao, ChunAn Ma

Published Feb 1, 2022• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-022-05008-x

Related papers

Fault-Tolerate Quantum Private Comparison Based on GHZ States and ECC

Yanbing Li, Tian‐Yin Wang, Huiyan Chen +2 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 2013•32 citations

Twice-Hadamard-CNOT attack on Li et al.'s fault-tolerant quantum private comparison and the improved scheme

季赛, 王芳, 刘文杰 +1 more

物理学前沿:英文版•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Cluster States

Zhiwei Sun, Dongyang Long

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Sep 5, 2012•90 citations

Twice-Hadamard-CNOT attack on Li et al.’s fault-tolerant quantum private comparison and the improved scheme

Sai Ji, Wang Sheng Fang, Wenjie Liu +1 more

Recently, Li et al. presented a two-party quantum private comparison scheme using Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states and error-correcting code (ECC) [ Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52, 2818 (2013)], claiming it is fault-tolerant and could be performed in a non-ideal scenario. However, there exists a fatal loophole in their private comparison scheme under a special attack, namely the twice-Hadamard-CNOT attack. Specifically, a malicious party may intercept the other party’s particles and execute Hadamard operations on the intercepted particles as well as on his or her own particles. Then, the malicious party could sequentially perform a controlled-NOT (CNOT) operation between intercepted particles and the auxiliary particles, as well as between his or her own particles and the auxiliary particles prepared in advance. By measuring the auxiliary particles, the secret input will be revealed to the malicious party without being detected. For resisting this special attack, a feasible improved scheme is proposed by introducing a permutation operator before the third party (TP) sends the particle sequences to each participant.

Frontiers of Physics•Feb 17, 2015•6 citations

Quantum Private Comparison Protocol without a Third Party

Wanqing Wu, Xiaoxue Ma

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 2020•8 citations

New Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Without a Third Party

Wanqing Wu, GuoLong Zhou, Yongxin Zhao +1 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 29, 2020•13 citations
Recently, Li et al. presented a two-party quantum private comparison scheme using Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states and error-correcting code (ECC) [ Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52, 2818 (2013)], claiming it is fault-tolerant and could be performed in a non-ideal scenario. However, there exists a fatal loophole in their private comparison scheme under a special attack, namely the twice-Hadamard-CNOT attack. Specifically, a malicious party may intercept the other party’s particles and execute Hadamard operations on the intercepted particles as well as on his or her own particles. Then, the malicious party could sequentially perform a controlled-NOT (CNOT) operation between intercepted particles and the auxiliary particles, as well as between his or her own particles and the auxiliary particles prepared in advance. By measuring the auxiliary particles, the secret input will be revealed to the malicious party without being detected. For resisting this special attack, a feasible improved scheme is proposed by introducing a permutation operator before the third party (TP) sends the particle sequences to each participant.