Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Einstein and the Macroscopic Limit of Quantum Mechanics

Published Nov 13, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-71520-9_7

Related papers

The classical limit of quantum mechanics: Self-induced decoherence and macroscopicity

Mario Castagnino, Olímpia Lombardi

•Jan 1, 2006•3 citations

Einstein and quantum mechanics

Evan Wilson

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 18, 2009•19 citations

Macroscopic quantum Schrödinger and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradoxes

M. D. Reid, Eric G. Cavalcanti

We propose macroscopic generalizations of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox in which the completeness of quantum mechanics is contrasted with forms of macroscopic reality and macroscopic local reality defined in relation to Schrödinger's original ‘cat’ paradox.

Journal of Modern Optics•Nov 10, 2005•5 citations

Testing Einstein's objection of 1927 to quantum mechanics opens the door to purely quantum communication

S. A. Emelyanov

Single electron may have wavefunction of a macroscopic lengthscale but cannot be detected in two places. At the Solvay Conference of 1927, Einstein argued that in a combination with Bohr's postulate about wavefunction as an exhaustive characteristics of electron, this fact implies nonlocality related to the collapse of a macroscopic wavefunction of single electron. This was his objection to Bohr's quantum mechanics (QM) in favor of de Broglie's quantum theory. We perform an experimental test in low-temperature state of matter where electrons have macroscopic orbit-like wavefunctions and surprisingly observe nonlocality of that type. This nonlocality differs in principle from the well-known Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) nonlocality because the former does not imply quantum entanglement and hence is beyond the no-communication theorem. Our observation is the first empirical justification of the choice in favor of QM in compare with de Broglie's theory. Moreover, now we can expand the current concept of reality and thus open the door to a realistic interpretation of quantum formalism. Ultimately, we thus come to a quantum model of Universe based on the standard QM.

arXiv:2302.10783•Feb 10, 2023•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics at the Macroscopic Level

A. J. Leggett

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 1987•30 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICS AT THE MACROSCOPIC LEVEL

Anthony J. Leggett

Series on directions in condensed matter physics•Aug 1, 1986•26 citations
Single electron may have wavefunction of a macroscopic lengthscale but cannot be detected in two places. At the Solvay Conference of 1927, Einstein argued that in a combination with Bohr's postulate about wavefunction as an exhaustive characteristics of electron, this fact implies nonlocality related to the collapse of a macroscopic wavefunction of single electron. This was his objection to Bohr's quantum mechanics (QM) in favor of de Broglie's quantum theory. We perform an experimental test in low-temperature state of matter where electrons have macroscopic orbit-like wavefunctions and surprisingly observe nonlocality of that type. This nonlocality differs in principle from the well-known Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) nonlocality because the former does not imply quantum entanglement and hence is beyond the no-communication theorem. Our observation is the first empirical justification of the choice in favor of QM in compare with de Broglie's theory. Moreover, now we can expand the current concept of reality and thus open the door to a realistic interpretation of quantum formalism. Ultimately, we thus come to a quantum model of Universe based on the standard QM.