Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Graduate texts in physics

Boltzmann’s Equation

Eleftherios N. Economou

Published Jan 1, 2010• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-02069-8_30

Related papers

Introduction of a Boltzmann observable and Boltzmann equation

L. Lanz, O. Melsheimer, Erhard Wacker

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jul 1, 1985•10 citations

On a derivation of the Boltzmann equation in Quantum Field Theory

Gregor Leiler

The Boltzmann equation (BE) is a commonly used tool for the study of non-equilibrium many particle systems. It has been introduced in 1872 by Ludwig Boltzmann and has been widely generalized throughout the years. Today it is commonly used in physical applications, from the study of ordinary fluids to problems in particle Cosmology where Quantum Field Theoretical techniques are essential. Despite its numerous experimental successes, the conceptual basis of the BE is not entirely clear. For instance, it is well known that it is not a fundamental equation of physics like, say, the Heisenberg equation (HE). A natural question then arises whether it is possible to derive the BE from physical first principles, i.e. the Heisenberg equation in Quantum Field Theory. In this work we attempted to answer this question and succeeded in deriving the BE from the HE, thus further clarifying its conceptual status. In particular, the results we have obtained are as follows. Firstly, we establish the non-perturbative validity of what we call the "pre-Boltzmann equation". The crucial point here is that this latter equation is equivalent to the Heisenberg equation. Secondly, we proceed to consider various limits of the pre-Boltzmann equation, namly the "low density" and the "weak coupling" limits, to obtain two equations that can be considered as generalizations of the BE. These limits are always taken together with the "long time" limit, which allows us to interpret the BE as an appropriate long time limit of the HE. The generalization we obtain consists in additional "correction" terms to the usual Boltzmann collision factor, and can be associated to multiple particle scattering. Unlike the pre-Boltzmann equation, these latter results are only valid pertubatively. Finally, we briefly consider the possibility to extend these results beyond said limits and outline some important aspects in this case.

•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Recent Applications of Boltzmann’s Theory

Dierk Rainer

Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations

Comparison of Boltzmann equations with quantum dynamics for scalar fields

M. Lindner, Markus Michael Müller

Boltzmann equations are often used to study the thermal evolution of particle reaction networks. Prominent examples are the computation of the baryon asymmetry of the universe and the evolution of the quark-gluon plasma after relativistic heavy ion collisions. However, Boltzmann equations are only a classical approximation of the quantum thermalization process which is described by the so-called Kadanoff-Baym equations. This raises the question how reliable Boltzmann equations are as approximations to the full Kadanoff-Baym equations. Therefore, we present in this paper a detailed comparison between the Kadanoff-Baym and Boltzmann equations in the framework of a scalar ${\ensuremath{\Phi}}^{4}$ quantum field theory in $3+1$ space-time dimensions. The obtained numerical solutions reveal significant discrepancies in the results predicted by both types of equations. Apart from quantitative discrepancies, on a qualitative level the universality respected by the Kadanoff-Baym equations is severely restricted in the case of Boltzmann equations. Furthermore, the Kadanoff-Baym equations strongly separate the time scales between kinetic and chemical equilibration. This separation of time scales is absent for the Boltzmann equation.

arXiv:hep-ph/0512147•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jun 5, 2006•50 citations

Boltzmann Limit

Springer eBooks•Dec 9, 2007•0 citations

Comparing Boltzmann vs. Kadanoff-Baym

Markus Michael Müller

(Classical) Boltzmann equations suffer from several shortcomings as compared to their quantum mechanical generalizations, the so-called Kadanoff-Baym equations. Nevertheless, in practical calculations approximations to Boltzmann equations are widely used. A prominent example is the computation of the baryon asymmetry of the universe. In this work, we present a detailed comparison between the Kadanoff-Baym and Boltzmann equations in the framework of a scalar phi 4 quantum field theory. We solve the Kadanoff-Baym and the Boltzmann equations numerically in 3 + 1 dimensions and compare their predictions on the evolution of systems out of thermal equilibrium for various initial conditions. The obtained numerical solutions reveal significant discrepancies between both types of equations. Most notably, the universality respected by Kadanoff-Baym equations is severely restricted in the case of Boltzmann equations.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Apr 1, 2006•5 citations
The Boltzmann equation (BE) is a commonly used tool for the study of non-equilibrium many particle systems. It has been introduced in 1872 by Ludwig Boltzmann and has been widely generalized throughout the years. Today it is commonly used in physical applications, from the study of ordinary fluids to problems in particle Cosmology where Quantum Field Theoretical techniques are essential. Despite its numerous experimental successes, the conceptual basis of the BE is not entirely clear. For instance, it is well known that it is not a fundamental equation of physics like, say, the Heisenberg equation (HE). A natural question then arises whether it is possible to derive the BE from physical first principles, i.e. the Heisenberg equation in Quantum Field Theory. In this work we attempted to answer this question and succeeded in deriving the BE from the HE, thus further clarifying its conceptual status. In particular, the results we have obtained are as follows. Firstly, we establish the non-perturbative validity of what we call the "pre-Boltzmann equation". The crucial point here is that this latter equation is equivalent to the Heisenberg equation. Secondly, we proceed to consider various limits of the pre-Boltzmann equation, namly the "low density" and the "weak coupling" limits, to obtain two equations that can be considered as generalizations of the BE. These limits are always taken together with the "long time" limit, which allows us to interpret the BE as an appropriate long time limit of the HE. The generalization we obtain consists in additional "correction" terms to the usual Boltzmann collision factor, and can be associated to multiple particle scattering. Unlike the pre-Boltzmann equation, these latter results are only valid pertubatively. Finally, we briefly consider the possibility to extend these results beyond said limits and outline some important aspects in this case.
Boltzmann equations are often used to study the thermal evolution of particle reaction networks. Prominent examples are the computation of the baryon asymmetry of the universe and the evolution of the quark-gluon plasma after relativistic heavy ion collisions. However, Boltzmann equations are only a classical approximation of the quantum thermalization process which is described by the so-called Kadanoff-Baym equations. This raises the question how reliable Boltzmann equations are as approximations to the full Kadanoff-Baym equations. Therefore, we present in this paper a detailed comparison between the Kadanoff-Baym and Boltzmann equations in the framework of a scalar ${\ensuremath{\Phi}}^{4}$ quantum field theory in 3+13+13+1 space-time dimensions. The obtained numerical solutions reveal significant discrepancies in the results predicted by both types of equations. Apart from quantitative discrepancies, on a qualitative level the universality respected by the Kadanoff-Baym equations is severely restricted in the case of Boltzmann equations. Furthermore, the Kadanoff-Baym equations strongly separate the time scales between kinetic and chemical equilibration. This separation of time scales is absent for the Boltzmann equation.
(Classical) Boltzmann equations suffer from several shortcomings as compared to their quantum mechanical generalizations, the so-called Kadanoff-Baym equations. Nevertheless, in practical calculations approximations to Boltzmann equations are widely used. A prominent example is the computation of the baryon asymmetry of the universe. In this work, we present a detailed comparison between the Kadanoff-Baym and Boltzmann equations in the framework of a scalar phi 4 quantum field theory. We solve the Kadanoff-Baym and the Boltzmann equations numerically in 3 + 1 dimensions and compare their predictions on the evolution of systems out of thermal equilibrium for various initial conditions. The obtained numerical solutions reveal significant discrepancies between both types of equations. Most notably, the universality respected by Kadanoff-Baym equations is severely restricted in the case of Boltzmann equations.