Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Superconductor maser: a calculation of the gain from the two-level model and the BCS theory and some new experimental results

W. N. Mathews, W. D. Gregory, G.L. Leopold, J. Bostock, Jonathan George

Published Jan 1, 1972• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Superconducting gap ratio from strange metal phase in the absence of quasiparticles

Wenhe Cai, Xian-Hui Ge

Abstract A lattice model for strongly interacting electrons motivated by a rank-3 tensor model provides a tool for understanding the pairing mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity. This Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev-like model describes the strange metal phase in the cuprate high temperature superconductors. Our calculation indicates that the superconducting gap ratio in this model is higher than the ratio in the BCS theory due to the coupling term and the spin operator. Under certain conditions, the ratio also agrees with the BCS theory. Our results relate to the case of strong coupling, so it may pave the way to gaining insight into the cuprate high temperature superconductors.

arXiv:1809.01846•Communications in Theoretical Physics•Jan 15, 2021•4 citations

The theory of the two-level solid-state maser

Ya I Khanin

Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics•Jan 1, 1968•0 citations

Behavior of a Two-Level Solid-State Maser

I. R. Senitzky

Physical Review Letters•Sep 1, 1958•17 citations

Entropy and heat capacity in the generalized Bose–Einstein condensation theory of superconductors

L. A. García, MANUEL DE LLANO

The new generalized Bose–Einstein condensation (GBEC) quantum-statistical theory starts from a noninteracting ternary boson-fermion (BF) gas of two-hole Cooper pairs (2hCPs) along with the usual two-electron Cooper pairs (2eCPs) plus unpaired electrons. Here we obtain the entropy and heat capacity and confirm once again that GBEC contains as a special case the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) theory. The energy gap is first calculated and compared with that of BCS theory for different values of a new dimensionless coupling parameter n/n[Formula: see text] where n is the total electron number density and n[Formula: see text] that of unpaired electrons at zero absolute temperature. Then, from the entropy, the heat capacity is calculated. Results compare well with elemental-superconductor data suggesting that 2hCPs are indispensable to describe superconductors (SCs).

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Oct 20, 2019•1 citation

BCS-to-BEC Quantum Phase Transition in High-Tc Superconductors and Fermionic Atomic Gases: A Functional Integral Approach

Sergio S. Botelho

The problem of the evolution from BCS theory with cooperative Cooper pairing to the formation and condensation of composite bosons has attracted considerable attention for the past several decades. It has gained renewed impetus in the mid-eighties with the discovery of the high-Tc superconductors, which have a coherence length comparable to the interparticle spacing. More recently, this subject has spurred a great deal of research activity in connection with experiments involving dilute atomic gases of fermionic atoms. The initial objective of this work will be to use functional integral techniques to analyze the low-temperature BCS-to-BEC evolution of d-wave superconductors within the saddle point (mean field) approximation for a continuum model. Then, the same mathematical formalism will be applied to the problem of the BCS-to-BEC evolution of fully spin-polarized p-wave Fermi gases in two dimensions. We find that a quantum phase transition occurs for both systems as they are driven from the BCS-like regime of weakly interacting fermionic pairs to the opposite BEC-like regime of strongly interacting bosonic molecules. This is in contrast to the smooth crossover predicted and observed in systems that exhibit s-wave pairing symmetry. We calculate several spectroscopic and thermodynamic properties that signal the occurrence of this phase transition, and suggest some possible experimental realizations. Finally, fluctuations about the saddle point solution are included in the calculations, and the effects of such correction are analyzed in the low (T~0) and high (T~Tc) temperature limits. We conclude that, at high temperatures, the bosonic degrees of freedom that arise from two-particle bound states become essential to describe the strong coupling limit,\nas the saddle point approximation alone becomes unreliable.

•Sep 12, 2005•2 citations

GENERATION AND AMPLIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION BY SUPERCONDUCTING FILMS – A SUPERCONDUCTOR MASER

Alexander N. Lykov

International Workshop on Physics and Technology of Thin Films (IWTF)•Jun 1, 2004•0 citations
Abstract A lattice model for strongly interacting electrons motivated by a rank-3 tensor model provides a tool for understanding the pairing mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity. This Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev-like model describes the strange metal phase in the cuprate high temperature superconductors. Our calculation indicates that the superconducting gap ratio in this model is higher than the ratio in the BCS theory due to the coupling term and the spin operator. Under certain conditions, the ratio also agrees with the BCS theory. Our results relate to the case of strong coupling, so it may pave the way to gaining insight into the cuprate high temperature superconductors.
The new generalized Bose–Einstein condensation (GBEC) quantum-statistical theory starts from a noninteracting ternary boson-fermion (BF) gas of two-hole Cooper pairs (2hCPs) along with the usual two-electron Cooper pairs (2eCPs) plus unpaired electrons. Here we obtain the entropy and heat capacity and confirm once again that GBEC contains as a special case the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) theory. The energy gap is first calculated and compared with that of BCS theory for different values of a new dimensionless coupling parameter n/n[Formula: see text] where n is the total electron number density and n[Formula: see text] that of unpaired electrons at zero absolute temperature. Then, from the entropy, the heat capacity is calculated. Results compare well with elemental-superconductor data suggesting that 2hCPs are indispensable to describe superconductors (SCs).
The problem of the evolution from BCS theory with cooperative Cooper pairing to the formation and condensation of composite bosons has attracted considerable attention for the past several decades. It has gained renewed impetus in the mid-eighties with the discovery of the high-Tc superconductors, which have a coherence length comparable to the interparticle spacing. More recently, this subject has spurred a great deal of research activity in connection with experiments involving dilute atomic gases of fermionic atoms. The initial objective of this work will be to use functional integral techniques to analyze the low-temperature BCS-to-BEC evolution of d-wave superconductors within the saddle point (mean field) approximation for a continuum model. Then, the same mathematical formalism will be applied to the problem of the BCS-to-BEC evolution of fully spin-polarized p-wave Fermi gases in two dimensions. We find that a quantum phase transition occurs for both systems as they are driven from the BCS-like regime of weakly interacting fermionic pairs to the opposite BEC-like regime of strongly interacting bosonic molecules. This is in contrast to the smooth crossover predicted and observed in systems that exhibit s-wave pairing symmetry. We calculate several spectroscopic and thermodynamic properties that signal the occurrence of this phase transition, and suggest some possible experimental realizations. Finally, fluctuations about the saddle point solution are included in the calculations, and the effects of such correction are analyzed in the low (T~0) and high (T~Tc) temperature limits. We conclude that, at high temperatures, the bosonic degrees of freedom that arise from two-particle bound states become essential to describe the strong coupling limit,\nas the saddle point approximation alone becomes unreliable.