Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Observables in the Hamiltonian Formalism. A dissertation based on the classical field theory formulation of Electromagnetism and General Relativity.

Carlos Zapata-Carratalá

Published Aug 30, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

An intrinsic formulation of Hamiltonian classical electromagnetism and an approach to Hamiltonian general relativity. Observables are discussed as part of the aforementioned theories.

Related papers

The Vertical Logic of Hamiltonian Methods (Part 1)

C. Baumgarten

We discuss the key role that Hamiltonian notions play in physics. Five examples are given that illustrate the versatility and generality of Hamiltonian notions. The given examples concern the interconnection between quantum mechanics, special relativity and electromagnetism. We demonstrate that a derivation of these core concepts of modern physics requires little more than a proper formulation in terms of classical Hamiltonian theory.

arXiv:2001.03412•Jan 10, 2020•0 citations

Geometric Hamiltonian Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

Davide Pastorello

My PhD thesis is focused on geometric Hamiltonian formulation of Quanum Mechanics and its interplay with standard formulation. The main result is the construction of a general prescription to set up a quantum theory as a classical-like theory where quantum dynamics is given by a Hamiltonian vector field on a complex projective space with Kähler structure. In such geometric framework quantum states are represented by classical-like Liouville densities. After a complete characterization of classical-like observables in a finite-dimensional quantum theory, the observable C*-algebra is described in geometric Hamiltonian terms. In the final part of the work, the classical-like Hamiltonian formulation is applied to the study of composite quantum systems providing a notion of entanglement measure.

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

The Vertical Logic of Hamiltonian Methods

C. Baumgarten

We discuss the key role that Hamiltonian notions could play in physics. Five examples are given that illustrate the underestimated versatility and almost magical generality of Hamiltonian notions. The given examples concern the interconnection between quantum mechanics, special relativity and electromagnetism. We demonstrate that a derivation of these core concepts of modern physics requires little more than a proper formulation in terms of classical Hamiltonian theory.

•Jan 10, 2020•0 citations

Quantum mechanics

Carlo Rovelli C

Quantum mechanics (QM) is not just a theory of micro-objects: it is our current fundamental theory of motion. It expresses a deeper understanding of Nature than classical mechanics. Precisely as classical mechanics, the conventional formulation of QM describes evolution of states and observables in time. Precisely as classical mechanics, this is not sufficient to deal with general relativistic systems, because these systems do not describe evolution in time; they describe correlations between observables. Therefore, a formulation of QM slightly more general than the conventional one – or a quantum version of the relativistic classical mechanics discussed in the previous chapter – is needed. In this chapter I discuss the possibility of such a formulation. In the last section I discuss the general physical interpretation of QM. QM can be formulated in a number of more or less equivalent formalisms: canonical (Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators), covariant (Feynman's sum-over-histories), algebraic (states as linear functionals over an abstract algebra of observables) and others. Generally, but not always, we are able to translate these formalisms into one another, but often what is easy in one formulation is difficult in another. A generalrelativistic sum-over-histories formalism has been developed by Jim Hartle. Here I focus on the canonical formalism, because the canonical formalism has provided the mathematical completeness and precision needed to explicitly construct the mathematical apparatus of quantum gravity. Later I will consider alternative formalisms.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 15, 2004•0 citations

Hamiltonian formulation of classical electrodynamics

M. Kira, S. W. Koch

At the conceptual level, the quantization procedure replaces the pure particle description of classical mechanics by a particle-wave treatment satisfying the requirements of the fundamental wave–particle dualism. Technically, one can always start from a generalized wave equation and use it as a basis to discuss wave-front propagation in the form of rays following classical particle trajectories, see Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1. Consequently, any wave theory inherently contains that aspect of the wave–particle dualism. Especially, Maxwell's equations of electrodynamic theory include both wave and particle aspects of electromagnetic fields. Hence, it could be that there are no additional “quantum,” i.e., wave–particle dualistic aspects. However, as we discuss in this chapter, Maxwell's equations can be expressed in the framework of Hamilton's formulation of particle mechanics. This then suggests that in addition to the approximate ray-like behavior, electromagnetic fields do have a supplementary level of particle-like properties. Due to the fundamental axiom of wave–particle dualism, the additional particle-like aspects of electromagnetic fields must then also have a wave counterpart that can be axiomatically introduced via the canonical quantization scheme described in Section 3.2.3. Since the spatial dependency in Maxwell's equation contains wave–particle dualism already at the classical level, it is clear that the new level of quantization cannot be a simple real-space feature but has to involve some other space describing the structure of the electromagnetic fields. In fact, this quantization yields several very concrete implications such as quantization of the light energy, elementary fluctuations in the light-field amplitude and intensity, and more.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 17, 2011•0 citations

Geometrical Formulation of Physics.

Johan Noldus

We define a unique geometrical Poisson bracket for classical physics of point particles and generalize this to the commutator algebra of quantum theory.

•Oct 1, 2018•0 citations
My PhD thesis is focused on geometric Hamiltonian formulation of Quanum Mechanics and its interplay with standard formulation. The main result is the construction of a general prescription to set up a quantum theory as a classical-like theory where quantum dynamics is given by a Hamiltonian vector field on a complex projective space with Kähler structure. In such geometric framework quantum states are represented by classical-like Liouville densities. After a complete characterization of classical-like observables in a finite-dimensional quantum theory, the observable C*-algebra is described in geometric Hamiltonian terms. In the final part of the work, the classical-like Hamiltonian formulation is applied to the study of composite quantum systems providing a notion of entanglement measure.
Quantum mechanics (QM) is not just a theory of micro-objects: it is our current fundamental theory of motion. It expresses a deeper understanding of Nature than classical mechanics. Precisely as classical mechanics, the conventional formulation of QM describes evolution of states and observables in time. Precisely as classical mechanics, this is not sufficient to deal with general relativistic systems, because these systems do not describe evolution in time; they describe correlations between observables. Therefore, a formulation of QM slightly more general than the conventional one – or a quantum version of the relativistic classical mechanics discussed in the previous chapter – is needed. In this chapter I discuss the possibility of such a formulation. In the last section I discuss the general physical interpretation of QM. QM can be formulated in a number of more or less equivalent formalisms: canonical (Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators), covariant (Feynman's sum-over-histories), algebraic (states as linear functionals over an abstract algebra of observables) and others. Generally, but not always, we are able to translate these formalisms into one another, but often what is easy in one formulation is difficult in another. A generalrelativistic sum-over-histories formalism has been developed by Jim Hartle. Here I focus on the canonical formalism, because the canonical formalism has provided the mathematical completeness and precision needed to explicitly construct the mathematical apparatus of quantum gravity. Later I will consider alternative formalisms.
At the conceptual level, the quantization procedure replaces the pure particle description of classical mechanics by a particle-wave treatment satisfying the requirements of the fundamental wave–particle dualism. Technically, one can always start from a generalized wave equation and use it as a basis to discuss wave-front propagation in the form of rays following classical particle trajectories, see Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1. Consequently, any wave theory inherently contains that aspect of the wave–particle dualism. Especially, Maxwell's equations of electrodynamic theory include both wave and particle aspects of electromagnetic fields. Hence, it could be that there are no additional “quantum,” i.e., wave–particle dualistic aspects. However, as we discuss in this chapter, Maxwell's equations can be expressed in the framework of Hamilton's formulation of particle mechanics. This then suggests that in addition to the approximate ray-like behavior, electromagnetic fields do have a supplementary level of particle-like properties. Due to the fundamental axiom of wave–particle dualism, the additional particle-like aspects of electromagnetic fields must then also have a wave counterpart that can be axiomatically introduced via the canonical quantization scheme described in Section 3.2.3. Since the spatial dependency in Maxwell's equation contains wave–particle dualism already at the classical level, it is clear that the new level of quantization cannot be a simple real-space feature but has to involve some other space describing the structure of the electromagnetic fields. In fact, this quantization yields several very concrete implications such as quantization of the light energy, elementary fluctuations in the light-field amplitude and intensity, and more.