Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Quantifying unsharpness of measurements via uncertainty

Yizhou Liu, Shunlong Luo

Published Nov 29, 2021• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In the conventional axiomatic formalism of quantum mechanics, a physical measurement of a quantum observable is mathematically represented by the spectral decomposition of the Hermitian operator associated with the observable. This constitutes the scenario of a L\"uders (projective) measurement, which includes a von Neumann (rank-one projective) measurement as a special and prominent instance. In this context, the measurement is called sharp in the sense that each measurement operator is an orthogonal projection (eigenprojection of the observable). In the modern operational formalism, a measurement is represented by a positive-operator valued measure (POVM), which consists of a family of non-negative definite operators (measurement operators, effects) summing to the identity. In this scenario, a measurement is called unsharp (fuzzy) if some measurement operators are not orthogonal projections. A natural question arises as to how to quantify unsharpness of a measurement. In this work, we address this issue in terms of uncertainty. For this purpose, we study a family of observables associated with a measurement and their uncertainty. By exploiting the difference between the (total) measurement uncertainty and the observable uncertainty, we are led to some information-theoretic quantifiers of unsharpness. We reveal their basic properties and illustrate them through some important measurements. In particular, we characterize L\"uders measurements and equiangular POVMs as extreme measurements in terms of unsharpness.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.104.052227

Related papers

Quantum Measurements

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we first review projective or von Neumann measurements from the point of view of the projection postulate and the Lüders rule, before turning to more general measurements modelled using positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). After examining their mathematical description, we discuss symmetric informationally complete (SIC) POVMs and Zauner’s conjecture, as well as the representation of POVMs as projective measurements on a larger Hilbert space, a result called Naimark dilation. We then a model for non-ideal projective measurements and analyse the properties of such measurements in relation to the properties unbiasedness, faithfulness, and non-invasiveness of ideal projective measurements. Finally, we consider the problem of distinguishing non-orthogonal quantum states and examine how the use of POVMs can be beneficial for this task.

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations

Quantum measurement beyond projection: POVMs, instruments, dilation theorems, ancilla-assisted partial measurement, and operational trade-offs

Sachin .

The projection postulate and spectral representation of observables remain central in quantum theory but describe only an idealized measurement limit. Realistic measurements may be inefficient, unsharp, weak, indirect, adaptive, destructive, or informationally incomplete. Positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs) provide the probability rule for processes, whereas quantum instruments specify state transformation. This review traces the hierarchy from von Neumann projective measurement to generalized measurement, emphasizing distinctions among effects, instruments, channels, and implementations. Naimark dilation realizes arbitrary POVMs through unitary coupling to an ancillary meter and projective readout. Stinespring dilation represents completely positive trace-preserving dynamics by unitary evolution on an enlarged system followed by partial trace. A qubit–ancilla interaction yields a partial-measurement instrument, its POVM effects, and its information–disturbance trade-off. It compares projective, generalized, and ancilla-mediated schemes; examines compatibility, instrument incompatibility, and disturbance; and surveys applications to state discrimination, tomography, control, and error correction. Recent developments in dynamic-circuit measurements and noisy-POVM compatibility are integrated with questions concerning measurement back-action and outcome definiteness. The review stresses that a POVM does not uniquely determine state update, dilation theorems establish realizability rather than unique mechanisms, and operational measurement theory does not settle definite outcomes, arguing quantum instruments provide a complete description of measurement.

International Journal of Physics and Applications•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantifying Measurement Objectivity: A Retrodictive Approach

Jiaxi Kuang, Teruaki Nagasawa, Kensei Torii +1 more

When can one interpret the outcomes of a quantum measurement as revealing a pre-existing objective property? Using the recently developed formalism of quantum measurement retrodiction, we provide a quantitative treatment of this question: for any POVM and faithful prior state, we construct a positive semidefinite bilinear form that quantifies the non-objectivity of every real-valued outcome feature through the disagreement between its predictive value and its retrodictive counterpart. We show that this form decomposes exactly into the sum of two positive semidefinite bilinear forms: an unsharpness form and an asymmetry form given by Wigner--Yanase skew information. The total form vanishes precisely on those outcome features that can be interpreted, relative to the prior, as revealing pre-existing properties; in particular, it vanishes identically if and only if the POVM is sharp and commutes with the prior. Finally, under maps that preserve the prior and are covariant under its modular group, asymmetry cannot increase, and any loss of asymmetry is offset by at least as much unsharpness, so that total non-objectivity cannot decrease.

quant-pharXiv:2608.17410•Aug 19, 2026•0 citations

Quantization Yielding Sharp and Unsharp Observables

Richard Tao Roni Hutagalung, Arief Hermanto, Muhammad Farchani Rosyid

The so-called spectral decomposition quantization (SDQ) involving spectral decompositions of the identity operator has been proposed. The quantization yields the standard (sharp) quantum observables in the form of Hermitian operators acting in the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions. Here, the quantizable classical observables are limited as in the case of geometric quantization (GQ). It has been shown that this quantization leads to the same results as those yielded by geometric quantization in the position representation as well as in the momentum representation. The method of quantization also has been formulated in the representation concerning any pair of canonical observables. Then, the quantization has been generalized by replacing the spectral measure appearing in the spectral decompositions of the identity operator with positive-operator-valued measure constructed by using suitable smearing function (e.g. confidence distribution) so that the quantization yields unsharp quantum observables. It has been shown that the unsharp quantum observables are yielded from the quantization of the so-called unsharp quantizable classical observables. Some properties of unsharp classical observables have been investigated. The explicit expressions of unsharp quantum observables have been obtained.

Modern Physics Letters A•Jan 6, 2026•0 citations

QUANTIZATION YIELDING SHARP AND UNSHARP OBSERVABLES

Richard Tao, Roni Hutagalung, Arief Hermanto +1 more

The so called spectral decomposition method of quantization involving spectral decompositions of the identity operator has been proposed. The quantization yields the standard (sharp) quantum observables in the form of Hermitean operators acting in the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions. Here, the quantizable classical observables are limited as in the case of geometric quantization. It has been shown that this quantization leads to the same results as those yielded by geometric quantization in the position representation as well as in the momentum representation. The method of quantization also has been formulated in the representation concerning any pair of canonical observables. Then, the quantization has been generalized by replacing the spectral measure appearing in the spectral decompositions of the identity operator with positive-operator-valued measure constructed by using suitable smearing function (e.g. confidence distribution) so that the quantization yields unsharp quantum observables. It has been shown that the unsharp quantum observables are yielded from the quantization of the so called unsharp quantizable classical observables. Some properties of unsharp classical observables have been investigated. The explicit expressions of unsharp quantum observables have been obtained.

•Sep 19, 2024•0 citations

Quantifying measurement incompatibility via measurement disturbance

Yi Rong Guo, Shunlong Luo

The incompatibility between quantum measurements (as mathematically represented by positive operator-valued measures, i.e., POVMs) is a key feature of quantum mechanics and is intrinsically related to the noncommutativity of operators. For both theoretical and practical considerations, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between quantum measurements, and considerable effort has been devoted to this issue. In this paper, we provide a novel approach to measurement incompatibility by exploiting the Lüders channels derived from POVMs and employing the measurement disturbance to quantify incompatibility. This is achieved by constructing an approximately joint measurement for a pair of POVMs, which is an enlarged POVM with the correct marginal property for one of the two POVMs but not necessarily for the other. The degree of failure of the marginal property for the other POVM is a kind of measurement disturbance and can be naturally interpreted as a quantifier of the incompatibility between the two POVMs. We reveal basic properties of this quantifier of measurement incompatibility, identify its maximal value in some cases, compare it with several popular measures in the literature, and illustrate it with some typical examples. Some related open issues are also discussed.

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•May 1, 2025•2 citations
In the conventional axiomatic formalism of quantum mechanics, a physical measurement of a quantum observable is mathematically represented by the spectral decomposition of the Hermitian operator associated with the observable. This constitutes the scenario of a L"uders (projective) measurement, which includes a von Neumann (rank-one projective) measurement as a special and prominent instance. In this context, the measurement is called sharp in the sense that each measurement operator is an orthogonal projection (eigenprojection of the observable). In the modern operational formalism, a measurement is represented by a positive-operator valued measure (POVM), which consists of a family of non-negative definite operators (measurement operators, effects) summing to the identity. In this scenario, a measurement is called unsharp (fuzzy) if some measurement operators are not orthogonal projections. A natural question arises as to how to quantify unsharpness of a measurement. In this work, we address this issue in terms of uncertainty. For this purpose, we study a family of observables associated with a measurement and their uncertainty. By exploiting the difference between the (total) measurement uncertainty and the observable uncertainty, we are led to some information-theoretic quantifiers of unsharpness. We reveal their basic properties and illustrate them through some important measurements. In particular, we characterize L"uders measurements and equiangular POVMs as extreme measurements in terms of unsharpness.
Abstract In this chapter we first review projective or von Neumann measurements from the point of view of the projection postulate and the Lüders rule, before turning to more general measurements modelled using positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). After examining their mathematical description, we discuss symmetric informationally complete (SIC) POVMs and Zauner’s conjecture, as well as the representation of POVMs as projective measurements on a larger Hilbert space, a result called Naimark dilation. We then a model for non-ideal projective measurements and analyse the properties of such measurements in relation to the properties unbiasedness, faithfulness, and non-invasiveness of ideal projective measurements. Finally, we consider the problem of distinguishing non-orthogonal quantum states and examine how the use of POVMs can be beneficial for this task.
The projection postulate and spectral representation of observables remain central in quantum theory but describe only an idealized measurement limit. Realistic measurements may be inefficient, unsharp, weak, indirect, adaptive, destructive, or informationally incomplete. Positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs) provide the probability rule for processes, whereas quantum instruments specify state transformation. This review traces the hierarchy from von Neumann projective measurement to generalized measurement, emphasizing distinctions among effects, instruments, channels, and implementations. Naimark dilation realizes arbitrary POVMs through unitary coupling to an ancillary meter and projective readout. Stinespring dilation represents completely positive trace-preserving dynamics by unitary evolution on an enlarged system followed by partial trace. A qubit–ancilla interaction yields a partial-measurement instrument, its POVM effects, and its information–disturbance trade-off. It compares projective, generalized, and ancilla-mediated schemes; examines compatibility, instrument incompatibility, and disturbance; and surveys applications to state discrimination, tomography, control, and error correction. Recent developments in dynamic-circuit measurements and noisy-POVM compatibility are integrated with questions concerning measurement back-action and outcome definiteness. The review stresses that a POVM does not uniquely determine state update, dilation theorems establish realizability rather than unique mechanisms, and operational measurement theory does not settle definite outcomes, arguing quantum instruments provide a complete description of measurement.
When can one interpret the outcomes of a quantum measurement as revealing a pre-existing objective property? Using the recently developed formalism of quantum measurement retrodiction, we provide a quantitative treatment of this question: for any POVM and faithful prior state, we construct a positive semidefinite bilinear form that quantifies the non-objectivity of every real-valued outcome feature through the disagreement between its predictive value and its retrodictive counterpart. We show that this form decomposes exactly into the sum of two positive semidefinite bilinear forms: an unsharpness form and an asymmetry form given by Wigner--Yanase skew information. The total form vanishes precisely on those outcome features that can be interpreted, relative to the prior, as revealing pre-existing properties; in particular, it vanishes identically if and only if the POVM is sharp and commutes with the prior. Finally, under maps that preserve the prior and are covariant under its modular group, asymmetry cannot increase, and any loss of asymmetry is offset by at least as much unsharpness, so that total non-objectivity cannot decrease.
The so-called spectral decomposition quantization (SDQ) involving spectral decompositions of the identity operator has been proposed. The quantization yields the standard (sharp) quantum observables in the form of Hermitian operators acting in the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions. Here, the quantizable classical observables are limited as in the case of geometric quantization (GQ). It has been shown that this quantization leads to the same results as those yielded by geometric quantization in the position representation as well as in the momentum representation. The method of quantization also has been formulated in the representation concerning any pair of canonical observables. Then, the quantization has been generalized by replacing the spectral measure appearing in the spectral decompositions of the identity operator with positive-operator-valued measure constructed by using suitable smearing function (e.g. confidence distribution) so that the quantization yields unsharp quantum observables. It has been shown that the unsharp quantum observables are yielded from the quantization of the so-called unsharp quantizable classical observables. Some properties of unsharp classical observables have been investigated. The explicit expressions of unsharp quantum observables have been obtained.
The so called spectral decomposition method of quantization involving spectral decompositions of the identity operator has been proposed. The quantization yields the standard (sharp) quantum observables in the form of Hermitean operators acting in the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions. Here, the quantizable classical observables are limited as in the case of geometric quantization. It has been shown that this quantization leads to the same results as those yielded by geometric quantization in the position representation as well as in the momentum representation. The method of quantization also has been formulated in the representation concerning any pair of canonical observables. Then, the quantization has been generalized by replacing the spectral measure appearing in the spectral decompositions of the identity operator with positive-operator-valued measure constructed by using suitable smearing function (e.g. confidence distribution) so that the quantization yields unsharp quantum observables. It has been shown that the unsharp quantum observables are yielded from the quantization of the so called unsharp quantizable classical observables. Some properties of unsharp classical observables have been investigated. The explicit expressions of unsharp quantum observables have been obtained.
The incompatibility between quantum measurements (as mathematically represented by positive operator-valued measures, i.e., POVMs) is a key feature of quantum mechanics and is intrinsically related to the noncommutativity of operators. For both theoretical and practical considerations, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between quantum measurements, and considerable effort has been devoted to this issue. In this paper, we provide a novel approach to measurement incompatibility by exploiting the Lüders channels derived from POVMs and employing the measurement disturbance to quantify incompatibility. This is achieved by constructing an approximately joint measurement for a pair of POVMs, which is an enlarged POVM with the correct marginal property for one of the two POVMs but not necessarily for the other. The degree of failure of the marginal property for the other POVM is a kind of measurement disturbance and can be naturally interpreted as a quantifier of the incompatibility between the two POVMs. We reveal basic properties of this quantifier of measurement incompatibility, identify its maximal value in some cases, compare it with several popular measures in the literature, and illustrate it with some typical examples. Some related open issues are also discussed.