Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Defence Science Journal

Secret Key Generation Schemes for Physical Layer Security

Megha Santhosh Kumar, R. Ramanathan, M. Jayakumar, Devendra Kumar Yadav

Published Jul 1, 2021• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Physical layer security (PLS) has evolved to be a pivotal technique in ensuring secure wireless communication. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the recent developments in physical layer secret key generation (PLSKG). The principle, procedure, techniques and performance metricesare investigated for PLSKG between a pair of users (PSKG) and for a group of users (GSKG). In this paper, a detailed comparison of the various parameters and techniques employed in different stages of key generation such as, channel probing, quantisation, encoding, information reconciliation (IR) and privacy amplification (PA) are provided. Apart from this, a comparison of bit disagreement rate, bit generation rate and approximate entropy is also presented. The work identifies PSKG and GSKG schemes which are practically realizable and also provides a discussion on the test bed employed for realising various PLSKG schemes. Moreover, a discussion on the research challenges in the area of PLSKG is also provided for future research.

DOI
10.14429/dsj.71.15403

Related papers

A Survey of Quantization Techniques for Physical Layer-Based Secret Key Generation in IoT Systems

Abdullah Dakhlallah Alshamdayn, Manki Min

Wireless communication systems are becoming increasingly important in our daily lives, especially with the rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT). Secure and reliable communication is essential for the correct functioning of critical applications and use cases such as healthcare, finance, transportation, and industrial automation. However, the growing number of connected devices introduces significant challenges to data security and privacy due to the open nature of wireless networks. While traditional encryption methods are effective, they can be resource-intensive and impractical for resource-constrained IoT environments. Physical layer security (PLS) provides a lightweight alternative by leveraging the inherent characteristics of wireless channels to generate symmetric secret keys without requiring third-party infrastructure. The PLS key generation process involves four main stages: channel sampling, quantization, reconciliation, and privacy amplification. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of existing quantization schemes, as this step plays a crucial role in determining the key generation rate (KGR) and key disagreement rate (KDR). Additionally, the paper classifies quantization methods as either lossless or lossy, providing insights into the trade-offs between security and efficiency.

IEEE International Conference on Computing (ICOCO)•Dec 12, 2024•3 citations

Comparative Analysis of Quantization Schemes for Physical Layer Key generation

Sujata V. Kadam, Joanne Gomes

Wireless networks get subjected to the different attacks because of it's open nature. Eavesdropping attack, which occurs at the Physical layer of the OSI model, has a great impact on wireless network security. Conventional security in wireless networks depends on the cryptographic techniques. But in wireless sensor networks where a key management infrastructure may not be present and the power resources are also limited, generating a cryptographic key between two mobile entities becomes difficult. Hence Physical layer Security (PLS) has become a novel research solution. In PLS based key generation, a symmetric secret key is obtained at both the ends of the legitimate users using the properties of wireless channel. The key generation process includes four major blocks namely channel measurement, quantization of input samples, error detection and correction and privacy amplification. The output of quantizer has a great effect on the bit mismatch rate (BMR) between the two legitimate users. It also has an impact on key generation rate (KGR). Hence selecting a proper quantizer becomes very essential. In this paper different Quantization schemes are analyzed to achieve effective PLS between the two legitimate users.

International Conference on Advances in Science and Technology (ICAST)•Dec 2, 2022•4 citations

Physical-Layer Key Generation Towards 6G: Overview, Challenges, and Evolving Designs

Yizhuo Wang, Qinghe Du, Xiao Tang +1 more

The diverse application scenarios envisioned for sixth generation (6G) are characterized by the deep integration of sensing and ubiquitous connectivity, which imposes unprecedentedly stringent security requirements. However, due to the open nature of wireless channels, mobile communications systems always face severe information security threats such as falsification, spoofing, interception, and repudiation. Cryptography-based symmetric and asymmetric encryption techniques remain mainstream solutions for information protection. Symmetric encryption is efficient and secure for legitimate users but suffers from key-distribution difficulties over open wireless channels, whereas asymmetric encryption resolves this problem but faces increasing risks from quantum computing due to its reliance on structured mathematical hardness assumptions. In response to these limitations, physical layer security (PLS) has gained a great deal of research attention as a powerful security component that leverages the features of varying wireless channels. Existing PLS schemes can be broadly classified into two categories. The first one takes advantage of the legitimate link’s opportunistic channel-quality superiority over or different spatial-domain directions from the attacking link, which still faces many practical implementation difficulties. The second category is termed physical-layer key generation (PLKG). It extracts the unique features of the legitimate link’s channel variation, which is often reciprocal, as the source of secret key generation and therefore can naturally implement secure key distribution tasks. This advantage no doubt injects new vigor to symmetric encryption as a stronger protection approach. Following this trend, we in this paper concentrate on the PLKG techniques. Specifically, we present a comprehensive overview on existing PLKG schemes, discussing diverse secret key generation and reconciliation methods. We further investigate the model-driven and deep-learning-based approaches tailored for the scenario with imperfect channel reciprocity between the sender and receiver. After comprehensively reviewing major existing schemes, we further discuss a recently proposed PLKG design based on codeword reconstruction, which makes use of the strong error-correcting capability of the forward-error-correction (FEC) codes to effectively implement secure and consistent secret key generation between the legitimate sender and receiver. Finally, we share our opinions on the unsolved challenges and potential research directions dedicated to PLKG toward meeting the security requirements of 6G.

Electronics•Aug 23, 2026•0 citations

Advances and Challenges in Physical Layer Security: A Comprehensive Review

Nina Zhang, Yuxin Ai, Dehua Zhang +2 more

Physical layer security (PLS) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the security of wireless communication systems. This paper provides a comprehensive review of PLS, including its basic concepts, key techniques, and recent developments. We begin by introducing the basic principles of PLS, including the concept of secrecy capacity and the key assumptions underlying PLS. We then discuss various techniques that have been proposed to enhance PLS, such as artificial noise, cooperative jamming, and beamforming. Next, we review recent research on PLS in different scenarios, including multi-user systems, cognitive radio networks, and wireless sensor networks. Finally, we conclude by discussing future research directions and open challenges in PLS.

International Conference on Ubiquitous Communication (Ucom)•Jul 7, 2023•5 citations

New Dimensions for Physical Layer Secret Key Generation: Excursion Lengths-Based Key Generation

Muhammad Adil, Habib Ullah Khan, Mohammad Arif +2 more

Physical Layer-based Secret Key Generation (PLSKG) between the legitimate nodes from the reciprocal wireless channel is a vastly studied area of Physical Layer Security (PLS). PLSKG aims to secure the wireless link between the legitimate nodes by symmetrically encrypting the wirelessly transmitted information via a secret key that is extracted from the common randomness of the stochastic wireless channel. PLSKG encompasses the intermediate steps of channel sampling, quantization, information reconciliation, and privacy amplification. The PLSKG algorithms are evaluated in terms of quantifiers such as Key Generation Rate (KGR), Key Agreement Probability (KAP), and randomness. The practical PLSKG algorithms (level-crossing algorithms) extract a secret key by analyzing the channel samples and assigning bit sequences to the channel samples lying in different quantization regions. Level-crossing algorithms are lossy and extract a secret key from the central samples of matched excursions between the legitimate nodes. This results in a reduced KGR as there is a scarcity of such matched excursions considering the fast variations of the wireless link between the legitimate nodes. This paper proposes a Two-Round Channel Parsing (TRCP) algorithm that exploits the correlation between the excursion lengths of the channel samples in addition to the sample correlation. TRCP effectively utilize the channel samples by reducing the sample losses incurred by lossy quantizers exploring a new dimension of correlated excursions of the channel samples between legitimate nodes. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed TRCP scheme enhances the KGR and KAP performance of the secret key and also passes the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) test suite of randomness.

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2024•6 citations

Improving Physical Layer Secret Key Generation in Fast Fading Environments Using Prediction

Pedro Cruz, Alexandre Miccheleti Lucena, Ricardo Suyama +1 more

Physical layer security (PLS) is an alternative to traditional information security mechanisms.Physical layer secret key generation (PSKG) is a PLS technique that uses channel randomness to generate keys for encryption algorithms.Although several works investigated PSKG in slow fading channels, fast fading scenarios remain a challenge.We propose two predictors to deal with such scenarios, one based on the Recursive Least Squares (RLS) and another based on the Dual Extended Kalman Filter (DEKF).The aim is to mitigate the channel variation effects during PSKG, reducing the errors between keys generated by legitimate users.

Anais de XXXV Simpósio Brasileiro de Telecomunicações e Processamento de Sinais•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations
Physical layer security (PLS) has evolved to be a pivotal technique in ensuring secure wireless communication. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the recent developments in physical layer secret key generation (PLSKG). The principle, procedure, techniques and performance metricesare investigated for PLSKG between a pair of users (PSKG) and for a group of users (GSKG). In this paper, a detailed comparison of the various parameters and techniques employed in different stages of key generation such as, channel probing, quantisation, encoding, information reconciliation (IR) and privacy amplification (PA) are provided. Apart from this, a comparison of bit disagreement rate, bit generation rate and approximate entropy is also presented. The work identifies PSKG and GSKG schemes which are practically realizable and also provides a discussion on the test bed employed for realising various PLSKG schemes. Moreover, a discussion on the research challenges in the area of PLSKG is also provided for future research.
Wireless communication systems are becoming increasingly important in our daily lives, especially with the rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT). Secure and reliable communication is essential for the correct functioning of critical applications and use cases such as healthcare, finance, transportation, and industrial automation. However, the growing number of connected devices introduces significant challenges to data security and privacy due to the open nature of wireless networks. While traditional encryption methods are effective, they can be resource-intensive and impractical for resource-constrained IoT environments. Physical layer security (PLS) provides a lightweight alternative by leveraging the inherent characteristics of wireless channels to generate symmetric secret keys without requiring third-party infrastructure. The PLS key generation process involves four main stages: channel sampling, quantization, reconciliation, and privacy amplification. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of existing quantization schemes, as this step plays a crucial role in determining the key generation rate (KGR) and key disagreement rate (KDR). Additionally, the paper classifies quantization methods as either lossless or lossy, providing insights into the trade-offs between security and efficiency.
Wireless networks get subjected to the different attacks because of it's open nature. Eavesdropping attack, which occurs at the Physical layer of the OSI model, has a great impact on wireless network security. Conventional security in wireless networks depends on the cryptographic techniques. But in wireless sensor networks where a key management infrastructure may not be present and the power resources are also limited, generating a cryptographic key between two mobile entities becomes difficult. Hence Physical layer Security (PLS) has become a novel research solution. In PLS based key generation, a symmetric secret key is obtained at both the ends of the legitimate users using the properties of wireless channel. The key generation process includes four major blocks namely channel measurement, quantization of input samples, error detection and correction and privacy amplification. The output of quantizer has a great effect on the bit mismatch rate (BMR) between the two legitimate users. It also has an impact on key generation rate (KGR). Hence selecting a proper quantizer becomes very essential. In this paper different Quantization schemes are analyzed to achieve effective PLS between the two legitimate users.
The diverse application scenarios envisioned for sixth generation (6G) are characterized by the deep integration of sensing and ubiquitous connectivity, which imposes unprecedentedly stringent security requirements. However, due to the open nature of wireless channels, mobile communications systems always face severe information security threats such as falsification, spoofing, interception, and repudiation. Cryptography-based symmetric and asymmetric encryption techniques remain mainstream solutions for information protection. Symmetric encryption is efficient and secure for legitimate users but suffers from key-distribution difficulties over open wireless channels, whereas asymmetric encryption resolves this problem but faces increasing risks from quantum computing due to its reliance on structured mathematical hardness assumptions. In response to these limitations, physical layer security (PLS) has gained a great deal of research attention as a powerful security component that leverages the features of varying wireless channels. Existing PLS schemes can be broadly classified into two categories. The first one takes advantage of the legitimate link’s opportunistic channel-quality superiority over or different spatial-domain directions from the attacking link, which still faces many practical implementation difficulties. The second category is termed physical-layer key generation (PLKG). It extracts the unique features of the legitimate link’s channel variation, which is often reciprocal, as the source of secret key generation and therefore can naturally implement secure key distribution tasks. This advantage no doubt injects new vigor to symmetric encryption as a stronger protection approach. Following this trend, we in this paper concentrate on the PLKG techniques. Specifically, we present a comprehensive overview on existing PLKG schemes, discussing diverse secret key generation and reconciliation methods. We further investigate the model-driven and deep-learning-based approaches tailored for the scenario with imperfect channel reciprocity between the sender and receiver. After comprehensively reviewing major existing schemes, we further discuss a recently proposed PLKG design based on codeword reconstruction, which makes use of the strong error-correcting capability of the forward-error-correction (FEC) codes to effectively implement secure and consistent secret key generation between the legitimate sender and receiver. Finally, we share our opinions on the unsolved challenges and potential research directions dedicated to PLKG toward meeting the security requirements of 6G.
Physical layer security (PLS) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the security of wireless communication systems. This paper provides a comprehensive review of PLS, including its basic concepts, key techniques, and recent developments. We begin by introducing the basic principles of PLS, including the concept of secrecy capacity and the key assumptions underlying PLS. We then discuss various techniques that have been proposed to enhance PLS, such as artificial noise, cooperative jamming, and beamforming. Next, we review recent research on PLS in different scenarios, including multi-user systems, cognitive radio networks, and wireless sensor networks. Finally, we conclude by discussing future research directions and open challenges in PLS.
Physical Layer-based Secret Key Generation (PLSKG) between the legitimate nodes from the reciprocal wireless channel is a vastly studied area of Physical Layer Security (PLS). PLSKG aims to secure the wireless link between the legitimate nodes by symmetrically encrypting the wirelessly transmitted information via a secret key that is extracted from the common randomness of the stochastic wireless channel. PLSKG encompasses the intermediate steps of channel sampling, quantization, information reconciliation, and privacy amplification. The PLSKG algorithms are evaluated in terms of quantifiers such as Key Generation Rate (KGR), Key Agreement Probability (KAP), and randomness. The practical PLSKG algorithms (level-crossing algorithms) extract a secret key by analyzing the channel samples and assigning bit sequences to the channel samples lying in different quantization regions. Level-crossing algorithms are lossy and extract a secret key from the central samples of matched excursions between the legitimate nodes. This results in a reduced KGR as there is a scarcity of such matched excursions considering the fast variations of the wireless link between the legitimate nodes. This paper proposes a Two-Round Channel Parsing (TRCP) algorithm that exploits the correlation between the excursion lengths of the channel samples in addition to the sample correlation. TRCP effectively utilize the channel samples by reducing the sample losses incurred by lossy quantizers exploring a new dimension of correlated excursions of the channel samples between legitimate nodes. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed TRCP scheme enhances the KGR and KAP performance of the secret key and also passes the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) test suite of randomness.
Physical layer security (PLS) is an alternative to traditional information security mechanisms.Physical layer secret key generation (PSKG) is a PLS technique that uses channel randomness to generate keys for encryption algorithms.Although several works investigated PSKG in slow fading channels, fast fading scenarios remain a challenge.We propose two predictors to deal with such scenarios, one based on the Recursive Least Squares (RLS) and another based on the Dual Extended Kalman Filter (DEKF).The aim is to mitigate the channel variation effects during PSKG, reducing the errors between keys generated by legitimate users.