Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Essays

On the missing anisotropic space inside atoms in quantum mechanics

Wladimir Guglinski

Published Sep 9, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Schrödinger developed his famous equation from the standard wavelength. However, as demonstrated here, inside the atom, the electron does not move according to de Broglie-Einstein’s postulate λ = h/p, because the wavelength of the electron’s motion varies with the distance to the nucleus. Therefore, Schrödinger’s equation does not quantify the real electron’s motion in atoms. Here, the equation of a variable wavelength for electron motion inside atoms is introduced. The calculation, applied to the hydrogen atom, achieves energy level values very close to the experimental values. This successful result can provide a deeper understanding of the behavior of electrons in atoms and improve the fundamentals of quantum mechanics (QM). However, beyond the question concerning the postulate λ = h/p, two other fundamental principles may be missing in modern QM, and they are: an anisotropic space inside atoms and a motion of the electron through a helical trajectory.

DOI
10.4006/0836-1398-34.3.351

Related papers

On how Bohr model of hydrogen atom is connected to nuclear physics

Wladimir Guglinski

The atom model of Quantum Mechanics (QM) was conceived from an unsolved paradox. Indeed, Schrödinger’s equation has been deducted by considering a free electron, but it is applied for the atom, where the electron is inside a potential. In order to eliminate the nonsense, quantum theorists proposed a ridiculous postulate: they claim it makes sense to use the equation because it gives results in agreement to experimental data. The unsolved paradox evidences that Schrödinger’s equation cannot be applied to the physical conditions considered in the QM atom model, and that his equation actually requires some special conditions not considered in the theory (for instance, the electron helical trajectory, rejected by Heisenberg). The banishment of the aether has introduced several paradoxes in the development of Theoretical Physics. And because the theorists have neglected other paradox (from the mathematical probability the spectacular successes of Bohr’s hydrogen atom cannot be accidental), these two unsolved paradoxes introduced dramatic consequences in the development of Nuclear Physics.

International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences•Jun 1, 2018•2 citations

A Spherical Atom Model of Helium Based on Well-Defined Electron Trajectories

Thomas Allmendinger

The present approach is an advancement of the author’s former attempts to develop an atom model of Helium with well-defined electron trajectories. Thus it calls in question the traditional quantum mechanics which assume—in contrast and as a consequence of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle—electronic probabilities of presence. Its basic idea consists of the assumption that the motions of the two electrons are influenced by their spins exhibiting the value h/2π, but in two different ways: on the one hand, one spin induces a rotation; and on the other hand, the other spin induces a harmonic oscillation. A second important relation is given by the fact that the retroactive force of the oscillation process is due to the centrifugal force when the process runs along the surface of a sphere, whereas in usual oscillation processes—such as the one of a spring pendulum—it is due to a permanent shift between potential and kinetic energy. Therefore, in the present case, the potential energy remains constant since the distance between the nucleus and the—diametrically positioned—electrons remains constant. Considering these two conditions and the usual physical relations such as Coulomb attraction, centrifugal force, and the conservation laws of the angular momentum and of the energy, it was possible to compute the respective key values. Thereby, the deflection of the oscillation angle ψ = 45˚ is remarkable. Finally, the process is described using a Cartesian coordinate system with z as the rotation axis, a variable oscillation distance d and variable rotation velocities rrot. Thereby, the projections onto the x-axis and on the y-axis are not identically equal, leading to an elliptic projection shape. Thus this system is anisotropic, in contrast to the isotropic array of the conventional quantum mechanics according to Schrödinger, where the 1s-orbital is spherically symmetrical. This anisotropy explains the existence of interatomic Van der Waals forces, which enable the condensation of Helium, even though the condensation temperature is very low. But in particular, it exhibits well-defined electron waves, thus finally delivering the explanation of the hypothesis of Louis de Broglie, which has been established 100 years ago.

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation

The nonlinear behaviors of movement of electron in the atoms

Pang Xiao‐feng

In view of difficulties and questions of quantum mechanics in description of motion of electrons in hydrogen atom, we here established their nonlinear theory of motion based on the true motions of electron and nucleon and the real interactions between them, in which the motion of electron is depicted by a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a Coulomb potential, the nonlinear interaction b∣φ∣2φ is produced by the change of Coulomb interaction between nucleon and electron due to the motion of nucleon. Thus the natures of the electron are thoroughly changed relative to those in quantum mechanics due to the nonlinear interactions, it not only is stable and localized, but also possesses a wave–corpuscle duality. Meanwhile, if its eigenenergy is still quantized and distributed in accordance with the energy levels, then we can use the new theory to explain perfectly the spectrum features of hydrogen atom, which resembles quantum mechanics, but its sizes of eigenenergy are depressed relative to that in quantum mechanics. This means that the nonlinear interaction enhances the localized and stable nature of the electron. Therefore, the new nonlinear theory is successful and correct to the hydrogen atom.

Modern Physics Letters B•May 10, 2015•0 citations

Bohr’s Model of Hydrogen Atom: A Review

Robert Wilson

This chapter has provided an alternate method of solving simple problems in atomic physics under Bohr’s model to aid good mental picture of hydrogen atom to scientists. Two values of fundamental physical properties of an electron in the hydrogen atom has been identified. By limiting the orbiting electrons to a series of circular orbits having discrete radii, Bohr could account for the series of discrete wavelengths in the emission spectrum of hydrogen. Light, he proposed, radiated from hydrogen atoms only when an electron made a transition from an outer orbit to one closer to the nucleus. These physical properties (Ve = 174090.938ms-1& Pe = 1.585860888 × 10-25kgms-1) are constant in nature. The aim for the review was to contribute to the solution of disagreement between the Bohr’s wavelength (\(\lambda\)0 = 91.12nm) and the Balmer’s experimental observation (\(\lambda\)0 = 91.18nm) for the emission spectrum of hydrogen atom. There are two other constants \(\delta\) = 7.199822 × 10-10 eVm and \(\zeta\) = 1503796277m-1 that were identified in the Bohr’s equation of the hydrogen atom. The four fundamental physical constants can be applied to multi-electron systems because they are inherent characteristics of an electron. They can also be derived from the steady state hydrogen atom Schrodinger's equation. For a deeper understanding, these constants may be scrutinised for their determination. The study recommends that current quantum atomic models and equations governing quantum physics should be revisited for better applications and understanding of the physical world.

Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International)•Jun 8, 2023•0 citations

Wrong Potential Energy Term in Schrödinger’s Equation for Hydrogen Atom

Gurcharn Singh Sandhu

Even after nine decades of successful run of the Quantum Mechanics (QM), different viewpoints on foundational problems of Quantum Physics are still being actively debated. That is because mathematical logic of QM often defies the physical intuition which constitutes the main spirit of Physics. De Broglie’s hypothesis of matter waves implied that the dynamic characteristics of a micro particle in motion, can be ascribed to the wave characteristics of the wavelet accompanying the particle. The Schrödinger equation models the matter-wave interactions through wavefunction ψ and effectively serves as the foundation of QM. Even though mathematical structure of the Schrödinger equation is sound and elegant, here we show a conceptual mistake in the development of this equation wherein the physical situation has not been correctly modeled in the equation. The Coulomb potential energy of the proton electron pair in Hydrogen atom is essentially the negative interaction energy between their superposed electrostatic fields which is inversely proportional to their instantaneous separation distance. Assuming the proton to be relatively fixed at the origin of an appropriate coordinate system, the potential energy of the orbiting electron will be a function of instantaneous position coordinates of the electron. This has not been properly modeled in the Schrödinger equation. The resulting errors in the solution have been quantitatively demonstrated in this paper. We have stressed the necessity of incorporating a specific correction in the potential energy term of the Schrödinger equation, after which it may facilitate the adoption of Bohmian QM.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2018•3 citations

Schrödinger Equation and Wave Function

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

During 1925 three different but equivalent versions of quantum theory were proposed, Schrodinger proposed wave mechanics; Heisenberg developed matrix mechanics and Dirac-introduced operator theory. Considering the de Broglie's matter waves Erwin Schrödinger, an Austrian physicist, argued that if a particle like an electron behaves as a wave then the equation of wave motion could be successfully applied to it. He postulated a function varying in both space and time in a wave-like manner. Schrodinger set up a linear and time-dependent wave-like equation, called Schrodinger wave equation, to describe the wave aspect of a particle taking account of de Broglie's relation for wavelength. This chapter discusses the Schrodinger equation and explores the general properties of the solution of the Schrodinger equation. It verifies the Ehrenfest's theorem in certain interesting systems and solves equation for linear harmonic oscillator and shows that their solutions are identical to the solutions of classical equation of motion.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 29, 2022•0 citations
Schrödinger developed his famous equation from the standard wavelength. However, as demonstrated here, inside the atom, the electron does not move according to de Broglie-Einstein’s postulate λ = h/p, because the wavelength of the electron’s motion varies with the distance to the nucleus. Therefore, Schrödinger’s equation does not quantify the real electron’s motion in atoms. Here, the equation of a variable wavelength for electron motion inside atoms is introduced. The calculation, applied to the hydrogen atom, achieves energy level values very close to the experimental values. This successful result can provide a deeper understanding of the behavior of electrons in atoms and improve the fundamentals of quantum mechanics (QM). However, beyond the question concerning the postulate λ = h/p, two other fundamental principles may be missing in modern QM, and they are: an anisotropic space inside atoms and a motion of the electron through a helical trajectory.
The atom model of Quantum Mechanics (QM) was conceived from an unsolved paradox. Indeed, Schrödinger’s equation has been deducted by considering a free electron, but it is applied for the atom, where the electron is inside a potential. In order to eliminate the nonsense, quantum theorists proposed a ridiculous postulate: they claim it makes sense to use the equation because it gives results in agreement to experimental data. The unsolved paradox evidences that Schrödinger’s equation cannot be applied to the physical conditions considered in the QM atom model, and that his equation actually requires some special conditions not considered in the theory (for instance, the electron helical trajectory, rejected by Heisenberg). The banishment of the aether has introduced several paradoxes in the development of Theoretical Physics. And because the theorists have neglected other paradox (from the mathematical probability the spectacular successes of Bohr’s hydrogen atom cannot be accidental), these two unsolved paradoxes introduced dramatic consequences in the development of Nuclear Physics.
The present approach is an advancement of the author’s former attempts to develop an atom model of Helium with well-defined electron trajectories. Thus it calls in question the traditional quantum mechanics which assume—in contrast and as a consequence of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle—electronic probabilities of presence. Its basic idea consists of the assumption that the motions of the two electrons are influenced by their spins exhibiting the value h/2π, but in two different ways: on the one hand, one spin induces a rotation; and on the other hand, the other spin induces a harmonic oscillation. A second important relation is given by the fact that the retroactive force of the oscillation process is due to the centrifugal force when the process runs along the surface of a sphere, whereas in usual oscillation processes—such as the one of a spring pendulum—it is due to a permanent shift between potential and kinetic energy. Therefore, in the present case, the potential energy remains constant since the distance between the nucleus and the—diametrically positioned—electrons remains constant. Considering these two conditions and the usual physical relations such as Coulomb attraction, centrifugal force, and the conservation laws of the angular momentum and of the energy, it was possible to compute the respective key values. Thereby, the deflection of the oscillation angle ψ = 45˚ is remarkable. Finally, the process is described using a Cartesian coordinate system with z as the rotation axis, a variable oscillation distance d and variable rotation velocities rrot. Thereby, the projections onto the x-axis and on the y-axis are not identically equal, leading to an elliptic projection shape. Thus this system is anisotropic, in contrast to the isotropic array of the conventional quantum mechanics according to Schrödinger, where the 1s-orbital is spherically symmetrical. This anisotropy explains the existence of interatomic Van der Waals forces, which enable the condensation of Helium, even though the condensation temperature is very low. But in particular, it exhibits well-defined electron waves, thus finally delivering the explanation of the hypothesis of Louis de Broglie, which has been established 100 years ago.
In view of difficulties and questions of quantum mechanics in description of motion of electrons in hydrogen atom, we here established their nonlinear theory of motion based on the true motions of electron and nucleon and the real interactions between them, in which the motion of electron is depicted by a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a Coulomb potential, the nonlinear interaction b∣φ∣2φ is produced by the change of Coulomb interaction between nucleon and electron due to the motion of nucleon. Thus the natures of the electron are thoroughly changed relative to those in quantum mechanics due to the nonlinear interactions, it not only is stable and localized, but also possesses a wave–corpuscle duality. Meanwhile, if its eigenenergy is still quantized and distributed in accordance with the energy levels, then we can use the new theory to explain perfectly the spectrum features of hydrogen atom, which resembles quantum mechanics, but its sizes of eigenenergy are depressed relative to that in quantum mechanics. This means that the nonlinear interaction enhances the localized and stable nature of the electron. Therefore, the new nonlinear theory is successful and correct to the hydrogen atom.
This chapter has provided an alternate method of solving simple problems in atomic physics under Bohr’s model to aid good mental picture of hydrogen atom to scientists. Two values of fundamental physical properties of an electron in the hydrogen atom has been identified. By limiting the orbiting electrons to a series of circular orbits having discrete radii, Bohr could account for the series of discrete wavelengths in the emission spectrum of hydrogen. Light, he proposed, radiated from hydrogen atoms only when an electron made a transition from an outer orbit to one closer to the nucleus. These physical properties (Ve = 174090.938ms-1& Pe = 1.585860888 × 10-25kgms-1) are constant in nature. The aim for the review was to contribute to the solution of disagreement between the Bohr’s wavelength (λ\lambdaλ0 = 91.12nm) and the Balmer’s experimental observation (λ\lambdaλ0 = 91.18nm) for the emission spectrum of hydrogen atom. There are two other constants δ\deltaδ = 7.199822 × 10-10 eVm and ζ\zetaζ = 1503796277m-1 that were identified in the Bohr’s equation of the hydrogen atom. The four fundamental physical constants can be applied to multi-electron systems because they are inherent characteristics of an electron. They can also be derived from the steady state hydrogen atom Schrodinger's equation. For a deeper understanding, these constants may be scrutinised for their determination. The study recommends that current quantum atomic models and equations governing quantum physics should be revisited for better applications and understanding of the physical world.
Even after nine decades of successful run of the Quantum Mechanics (QM), different viewpoints on foundational problems of Quantum Physics are still being actively debated. That is because mathematical logic of QM often defies the physical intuition which constitutes the main spirit of Physics. De Broglie’s hypothesis of matter waves implied that the dynamic characteristics of a micro particle in motion, can be ascribed to the wave characteristics of the wavelet accompanying the particle. The Schrödinger equation models the matter-wave interactions through wavefunction ψ and effectively serves as the foundation of QM. Even though mathematical structure of the Schrödinger equation is sound and elegant, here we show a conceptual mistake in the development of this equation wherein the physical situation has not been correctly modeled in the equation. The Coulomb potential energy of the proton electron pair in Hydrogen atom is essentially the negative interaction energy between their superposed electrostatic fields which is inversely proportional to their instantaneous separation distance. Assuming the proton to be relatively fixed at the origin of an appropriate coordinate system, the potential energy of the orbiting electron will be a function of instantaneous position coordinates of the electron. This has not been properly modeled in the Schrödinger equation. The resulting errors in the solution have been quantitatively demonstrated in this paper. We have stressed the necessity of incorporating a specific correction in the potential energy term of the Schrödinger equation, after which it may facilitate the adoption of Bohmian QM.
During 1925 three different but equivalent versions of quantum theory were proposed, Schrodinger proposed wave mechanics; Heisenberg developed matrix mechanics and Dirac-introduced operator theory. Considering the de Broglie's matter waves Erwin Schrödinger, an Austrian physicist, argued that if a particle like an electron behaves as a wave then the equation of wave motion could be successfully applied to it. He postulated a function varying in both space and time in a wave-like manner. Schrodinger set up a linear and time-dependent wave-like equation, called Schrodinger wave equation, to describe the wave aspect of a particle taking account of de Broglie's relation for wavelength. This chapter discusses the Schrodinger equation and explores the general properties of the solution of the Schrodinger equation. It verifies the Ehrenfest's theorem in certain interesting systems and solves equation for linear harmonic oscillator and shows that their solutions are identical to the solutions of classical equation of motion.