Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Choices of Quantum Representations of Classical Dynamical Systems

C. Dewitt-Morette

Published Jan 1, 1988• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Wave operator representation of quantum and classical dynamics

Gerard McCaul, Dmitry V. Zhdanov, Denys I. Bondar

The choice of mathematical representation when describing physical systems is of great consequence, and this choice is usually determined by the properties of the problem at hand. Here we examine the little-known wave operator representation of quantum dynamics and explore its connection to standard methods of quantum dynamics, such as the Wigner phase-space function. This method takes as its central object the square root of the density matrix and consequently enjoys several unusual advantages over standard representations. By combining this with purification techniques imported from quantum information, we are able to obtain a number of results. Not only is this formalism able to provide a natural bridge between phase- and Hilbert-space representations of both quantum and classical dynamics, we also find the wave operator representation leads to semiclassical approximations of both real and imaginary time dynamics, as well as a transparent correspondence to the classical limit. It is then demonstrated that there exist a number of scenarios (such as thermalization) in which the wave operator representation possesses an equivalent unitary evolution, which corresponds to nonlinear real-time dynamics for the density matrix. We argue that the wave operator provides a new perspective that links previously unrelated representations and is a natural candidate model for scenarios (such as hybrids) in which positivity cannot be otherwise guaranteed.

arXiv:2302.13208•Physical Review A•Nov 8, 2023•9 citations

Formulations of Classical and Quantum Dynamical Theory

Mathematics in Science and Engineering/Mathematics in science and engineering•Jan 1, 1969•81 citations

External gauge field-coupled quantum dynamics: Gauge choices, Heisenberg algebra representations and gauge invariance in general, and the Landau problem in particular

Jan Govaerts A

Even though its classical equations of motion are then left invariant, when an action is redefined by an additive total derivative or divergence term (in time, in the case of a mechanical system) such a transformation induces non-trivial consequences for the system’s canonical phase space formulation. This is even more true and then in more subtle ways for the canonically quantized dynamics, with, in particular, an induced transformation in the unitary configuration space representation of the Heisenberg algebra being used for the quantum system. When coupled to a background gauge field, such considerations become crucial for a proper understanding of the consequences for the system’s quantum dynamics of gauge transformations of that classical external background gauge field, while under such transformations, the system’s degrees of freedom, abstract quantum states and quantum dynamics are certainly strictly invariant. After a detailed analysis of these different points in a general context, these are then illustrated specifically in the case of the quantum Landau problem with its classical external background magnetic vector potential for which the most general possible parametrized gauge choice is implemented herein. The latter discussion aims as well to clarify some perplexing statements in the literature regarding the status of gauge choices to be made for the magnetic vector potential for that quantum system. The role of the global spacetime symmetries of the Landau problem and their gauge invariant Noether charges is then also emphasized.

arXiv:2304.13122•Reviews in Mathematical Physics•May 13, 2023•1 citation

Classical Dynamics and Its Quantum Analogues

David S. Park

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1979•10 citations

Classical Dynamics and Its Quantum Analogues

David S. Park

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•57 citations

Sampling of quantum dynamics at long time

Alessandro Sergi, Francesco Petruccione

The principle of energy conservation leads to a generalized choice of transition probability in a piecewise adiabatic representation of quantum(-classical) dynamics. Significant improvement (almost an order of magnitude, depending on the parameters of the calculation) over previous schemes is achieved. Perspectives for theoretical calculations in coherent many-body systems are opened.

arXiv:0912.1113•Physical Review E•Mar 3, 2010•18 citations
The choice of mathematical representation when describing physical systems is of great consequence, and this choice is usually determined by the properties of the problem at hand. Here we examine the little-known wave operator representation of quantum dynamics and explore its connection to standard methods of quantum dynamics, such as the Wigner phase-space function. This method takes as its central object the square root of the density matrix and consequently enjoys several unusual advantages over standard representations. By combining this with purification techniques imported from quantum information, we are able to obtain a number of results. Not only is this formalism able to provide a natural bridge between phase- and Hilbert-space representations of both quantum and classical dynamics, we also find the wave operator representation leads to semiclassical approximations of both real and imaginary time dynamics, as well as a transparent correspondence to the classical limit. It is then demonstrated that there exist a number of scenarios (such as thermalization) in which the wave operator representation possesses an equivalent unitary evolution, which corresponds to nonlinear real-time dynamics for the density matrix. We argue that the wave operator provides a new perspective that links previously unrelated representations and is a natural candidate model for scenarios (such as hybrids) in which positivity cannot be otherwise guaranteed.
Even though its classical equations of motion are then left invariant, when an action is redefined by an additive total derivative or divergence term (in time, in the case of a mechanical system) such a transformation induces non-trivial consequences for the system’s canonical phase space formulation. This is even more true and then in more subtle ways for the canonically quantized dynamics, with, in particular, an induced transformation in the unitary configuration space representation of the Heisenberg algebra being used for the quantum system. When coupled to a background gauge field, such considerations become crucial for a proper understanding of the consequences for the system’s quantum dynamics of gauge transformations of that classical external background gauge field, while under such transformations, the system’s degrees of freedom, abstract quantum states and quantum dynamics are certainly strictly invariant. After a detailed analysis of these different points in a general context, these are then illustrated specifically in the case of the quantum Landau problem with its classical external background magnetic vector potential for which the most general possible parametrized gauge choice is implemented herein. The latter discussion aims as well to clarify some perplexing statements in the literature regarding the status of gauge choices to be made for the magnetic vector potential for that quantum system. The role of the global spacetime symmetries of the Landau problem and their gauge invariant Noether charges is then also emphasized.