Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Post-quantum Asynchronous Deniable Key Exchange and the Signal Handshake

Jacqueline Brendel, Rune Fiedler, Felix Günther, Christian Janson, Douglas Stebila

Published Jan 1, 2022• 39 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-97131-1_1

Related papers

Deniable Public-Key Authenticated Quantum Key Exchange

Jeroen van Wier, Arash Atashpendar, Peter B. Roenne

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Revisiting Deniability in Quantum Key Exchange

Arash Atashpendar, Guru-Vamsi Policharla, Peter Browne Rønne +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2018•2 citations

On Deniability in Quantum Key Exchange

Donald Beaver

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2002•8 citations

A Survey on Post-Quantum Key Exchange

Sitnikov, Konstantin

•Oct 1, 2017•0 citations

A Deniability Analysis of Signal’s Initial Handshake PQXDH

Rune Fiedler, Christian Janson

Many use messaging apps such as Signal to exercise their right to private communication. To cope with the advent of quantum computing, Signal employs a new initial handshake protocol called PQXDH for post-quantum confidentiality, yet keeps guarantees of authenticity and deniability classical. Compared to its predecessor X3DH, PQXDH includes a KEM encapsulation and a signature on the ephemeral key. In this work we show that PQXDH does not meet the same deniability guarantees as X3DH due to the signature on the ephemeral key. Our analysis relies on plaintext awareness of the KEM, which Signal's implementation of PQXDH does not provide. As for X3DH, both parties (initiator and responder) obtain different deniability guarantees due to the asymmetry of the protocol. For our analysis of PQXDH, we introduce a new model for deniability of key exchange that allows a more fine-grained analysis. Our deniability model picks up on the ideas of prior work and facilitates new combinations of deniability notions, such as deniability against malicious adversaries in the big brother model, i.e. where the distinguisher knows all secret keys. Our model may be of independent interest.

Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies•Jul 6, 2024•7 citations

Post-quantum security of encrypted key exchange protocol

Yang Li, Rui-Rui Zhou

•May 24, 2013•0 citations
Many use messaging apps such as Signal to exercise their right to private communication. To cope with the advent of quantum computing, Signal employs a new initial handshake protocol called PQXDH for post-quantum confidentiality, yet keeps guarantees of authenticity and deniability classical. Compared to its predecessor X3DH, PQXDH includes a KEM encapsulation and a signature on the ephemeral key. In this work we show that PQXDH does not meet the same deniability guarantees as X3DH due to the signature on the ephemeral key. Our analysis relies on plaintext awareness of the KEM, which Signal's implementation of PQXDH does not provide. As for X3DH, both parties (initiator and responder) obtain different deniability guarantees due to the asymmetry of the protocol. For our analysis of PQXDH, we introduce a new model for deniability of key exchange that allows a more fine-grained analysis. Our deniability model picks up on the ideas of prior work and facilitates new combinations of deniability notions, such as deniability against malicious adversaries in the big brother model, i.e. where the distinguisher knows all secret keys. Our model may be of independent interest.