Despite immense progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity in the past decade, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. In fact, even defining the problem properly is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally-invariant (TI) Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; this precision (given by n the number of bits of the approximation) is the sole input to the problem. Understanding the complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for a physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in FEXPQMA-EXP and is hard for FEXPNEXP. This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input.
Despite immense progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity in the past decade, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. In fact, even defining the problem properly is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally-invariant (TI) Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; this precision (given by n the number of bits of the approximation) is the sole input to the problem. Understanding the complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for a physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in FEXPQMA-EXP and is hard for FEXPNEXP. This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input.
Despite immense progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity in the past decade, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. In fact, even defining the problem properly is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally-invariant (TI) Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; this precision (given by n the number of bits of the approximation) is the sole input to the problem. Understanding the complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for a physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in FEXP QMA-EXP and is hard for FEXP NEXP . This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input. As an ingredient in our construction, we study the problem of computing the ground energy of translationally invariant finite 1D chains. A single Hamiltonian term, which is a fixed parameter of the problem, is applied to every pair of particles in a finite chain. In the finite case, the length of the chain is the sole input to the problem and the task is to compute an approximation of the ground energy. No thresholds are provided as in the standard formulation of the local Hamiltonian problem. We show that this problem is contained in FP QMA-EXP and is hard for FP NEXP . Our techniques employ a circular clock structure in which the ground energy is calibrated by the length of the cycle. This requires more precise expressions for the ground energies of the resulting matrices than were required for previous QMA-completeness constructions and even exact analytical bounds for the infinite case which we derive using techniques from spectral graph theory. To our knowledge, this is the first use of the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that shows hardness for a function class.
Despite progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. Even defining the problem is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally invariant Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; the number of bits n for the precision is the sole input to the problem. The complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for the physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in $\mbox{FEXP}^{\mbox{QMA-EXP}}$ and is hard for $\mbox{FEXP}^{\mbox{NEXP}}$. This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input. As an ingredient in our construction, we study the problem of computing the ground energy of translationally invariant finite 1D chains. A single Hamiltonian term, which is a fixed parameter of the problem, is applied to every pair of particles in a finite chain. The length of the chain is the sole input to the problem and the task is to compute an approximation of the ground energy. No thresholds are provided as in the standard formulation of the local Hamiltonian problem. We show that this problem is contained in $\mbox{FP}^{\mbox{QMA-EXP}}$ and is hard for $\mbox{FP}^{\mbox{NEXP}}$. Our techniques employ a circular clock in which the ground energy is calibrated by the length of the cycle. This requires more precise expressions for the ground states of the resulting matrices than was required for previous QMA-completeness constructions and even exact analytical bounds for the infinite case which we derive using techniques from spectral graph theory. To our knowledge, this is the first use of the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction which shows hardness for a function class.
It is known that three fundamental questions regarding local Hamiltonians -- approximating the ground state energy (the Local Hamiltonian problem), simulating local measurements on the ground space (APX-SIM), and deciding if the low energy space has an energy barrier (GSCON) -- are QMA-hard, PQMA[log]-hard and QCMA-hard, respectively, meaning they are likely intractable even on a quantum computer. Yet while hardness for the Local Hamiltonian problem is known to hold even for translationally-invariant systems, it is not yet known whether APX-SIM and GSCON remain hard in such "simple" systems. In this work, we show that the translationally invariant versions of both APX-SIM and GSCON remain intractable, namely are PQMAEXP- and QCMAEXP-complete, respectively. Each of these results is attained by giving a respective generic "lifting theorem" for producing hardness results. For APX-SIM, for example, we give a framework for "lifting" any abstract local circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping H (satisfying mild assumptions) to hardness of APX-SIM on the family of Hamiltonians produced by H, while preserving the structural and geometric properties of H (e.g. translation invariance, geometry, locality, etc). Each result also leverages counterintuitive properties of our constructions: for APX-SIM, we "compress" the answers to polynomially many parallel queries to a QMA oracle into a single qubit. For GSCON, we give a hardness construction robust against highly non-local unitaries, i.e. even if the adversary acts on all but one qudit in the system in each step.
Phase diagrams chart material properties with respect to one or more external or internal parameters such as pressure or magnetisation; as such, they play a fundamental role in many theoretical and applied fields of science. In this work, we prove that provided the phase of the Hamiltonian at a finite size reflects the phase in the thermodynamic limit, approximating the critical boundary in its phase diagram to constant precision is PQMAEXP-complete. This holds even for translationally-invariant nearest neighbour couplings, and even if the system's phase diagram is promised to have a single critical boundary delineating two phases. For the simpler case of a single parameter, the same problem remains QMAEXP-hard. Our results extend the study of quantum phases to systems with more realistic phase diagrams than previously studied. Furthermore, our findings place complexity-theoretic constraints on the effectiveness of (computational or analytic) methods based on finite size criteria, similar in spirit to the Knabe bound, for the task of extrapolating the properties (e.g. gapped/gapless) of a system from finite-size observations to the thermodynamic limit.
The local Hamiltonian (LH) problem is the canonical QMA-complete problem introduced by Kitaev. In this paper, we show its hardness in a very strong sense: we show that the 3-local Hamiltonian problem on n qubits cannot be solved classically in time O(2(1−ε)n) for any ε>0 under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), and cannot be solved quantumly in time O(2(1−ε)n/2) for any ε>0 under the Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (QSETH). These lower bounds give evidence that the currently known classical and quantum algorithms for LH cannot be significantly improved.
Furthermore, we are able to demonstrate fine-grained complexity lower bounds for approximating the quantum partition function (QPF) with an arbitrary constant relative error. Approximating QPF with relative error is known to be equivalent to approximately counting the dimension of the solution subspace of QMA problems. We show the SETH and QSETH hardness to estimate QPF with constant relative error. We then provide a quantum algorithm that runs in O(2n) time for an arbitrary 1/poly(n) relative error, matching our lower bounds and improving the state-of-the-art algorithm by Bravyi, Chowdhury, Gosset, and Wocjan (Nature Physics 2022) in the low-temperature regime.
To prove our fine-grained lower bounds, we introduce the first size-preserving circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that encodes the computation of a T-time quantum circuit acting on N qubits into a (d+1)-local Hamiltonian acting on N+O(T1/d) qubits. This improves the standard construction based on the unary clock, which uses N+O(T) qubits.