Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2107.06201

Hamiltonian Complexity in the Thermodynamic Limit

Dorit Aharonov, Sandy Irani

Published Jul 13, 2021• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Despite progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. Even defining the problem is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally invariant Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; the number of bits $n$ for the precision is the sole input to the problem. The complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for the physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in $\mbox{FEXP}^{\mbox{QMA-EXP}}$ and is hard for $\mbox{FEXP}^{\mbox{NEXP}}$. This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input. As an ingredient in our construction, we study the problem of computing the ground energy of translationally invariant finite 1D chains. A single Hamiltonian term, which is a fixed parameter of the problem, is applied to every pair of particles in a finite chain. The length of the chain is the sole input to the problem and the task is to compute an approximation of the ground energy. No thresholds are provided as in the standard formulation of the local Hamiltonian problem. We show that this problem is contained in $\mbox{FP}^{\mbox{QMA-EXP}}$ and is hard for $\mbox{FP}^{\mbox{NEXP}}$. Our techniques employ a circular clock in which the ground energy is calibrated by the length of the cycle. This requires more precise expressions for the ground states of the resulting matrices than was required for previous QMA-completeness constructions and even exact analytical bounds for the infinite case which we derive using techniques from spectral graph theory. To our knowledge, this is the first use of the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction which shows hardness for a function class.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2107.06201

Related papers

Hamiltonian Complexity in the Thermodynamic Limit

Dorit Aharonov, Sandy Irani

Despite immense progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity in the past decade, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. In fact, even defining the problem properly is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally-invariant (TI) Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; this precision (given by n the number of bits of the approximation) is the sole input to the problem. Understanding the complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for a physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in FEXP QMA-EXP and is hard for FEXP NEXP . This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input. As an ingredient in our construction, we study the problem of computing the ground energy of translationally invariant finite 1D chains. A single Hamiltonian term, which is a fixed parameter of the problem, is applied to every pair of particles in a finite chain. In the finite case, the length of the chain is the sole input to the problem and the task is to compute an approximation of the ground energy. No thresholds are provided as in the standard formulation of the local Hamiltonian problem. We show that this problem is contained in FP QMA-EXP and is hard for FP NEXP . Our techniques employ a circular clock structure in which the ground energy is calibrated by the length of the cycle. This requires more precise expressions for the ground energies of the resulting matrices than were required for previous QMA-completeness constructions and even exact analytical bounds for the infinite case which we derive using techniques from spectral graph theory. To our knowledge, this is the first use of the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that shows hardness for a function class.

Journal of the ACM•Oct 6, 2025•1 citation

Hamiltonian complexity in the thermodynamic limit

Dorit Aharonov, Sandy Irani

Despite immense progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity in the past decade, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. In fact, even defining the problem properly is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally-invariant (TI) Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; this precision (given by n the number of bits of the approximation) is the sole input to the problem. Understanding the complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for a physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in FEXPQMA-EXP and is hard for FEXPNEXP. This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 9, 2022•10 citations

The Complexity of Translationally Invariant Problems Beyond Ground State Energies

James D. Watson, Johannes Bausch, Sevag Gharibian

It is known that three fundamental questions regarding local Hamiltonians -- approximating the ground state energy (the Local Hamiltonian problem), simulating local measurements on the ground space (APX-SIM), and deciding if the low energy space has an energy barrier (GSCON) -- are $\mathsf{QMA}$-hard, $\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{QMA}[log]}$-hard and $\mathsf{QCMA}$-hard, respectively, meaning they are likely intractable even on a quantum computer. Yet while hardness for the Local Hamiltonian problem is known to hold even for translationally-invariant systems, it is not yet known whether APX-SIM and GSCON remain hard in such "simple" systems. In this work, we show that the translationally invariant versions of both APX-SIM and GSCON remain intractable, namely are $\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{QMA}_{\mathsf{EXP}}}$- and $\mathsf{QCMA}_{\mathsf{EXP}}$-complete, respectively. Each of these results is attained by giving a respective generic "lifting theorem" for producing hardness results. For APX-SIM, for example, we give a framework for "lifting" any abstract local circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping $H$ (satisfying mild assumptions) to hardness of APX-SIM on the family of Hamiltonians produced by $H$, while preserving the structural and geometric properties of $H$ (e.g. translation invariance, geometry, locality, etc). Each result also leverages counterintuitive properties of our constructions: for APX-SIM, we "compress" the answers to polynomially many parallel queries to a QMA oracle into a single qubit. For GSCON, we give a hardness construction robust against highly non-local unitaries, i.e. even if the adversary acts on all but one qudit in the system in each step.

arXiv:2012.12717•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Dec 23, 2020•8 citations

The Complexity of Translationally Invariant Spin Chains with Low Local Dimension

Johannes Bausch, Toby S. Cubitt, Māris Ozols

We prove that estimating the ground state energy of a translationally invariant, nearest-neighbour Hamiltonian on a 1D spin chain is $$\textsf {QMA}_{{\textsf {EXP}}}$$ -complete, even for systems of low local dimension ( $$\approx 40$$ ). This is an improvement over the best previously known result by several orders of magnitude, and it shows that spin-glass-like frustration can occur in translationally invariant quantum systems with a local dimension comparable to the smallest-known non-translationally invariant systems with similar behaviour. While previous constructions of such systems rely on standard models of quantum computation, we construct a new model that is particularly well-suited for encoding quantum computation into the ground state of a translationally invariant system. This allows us to shift the proof burden from optimizing the Hamiltonian encoding a standard computational model, to proving universality of a simple model. Previous techniques for encoding quantum computation into the ground state of a local Hamiltonian allow only a linear sequence of gates, hence only a linear (or nearly linear) path in the graph of all computational states. We extend these techniques by allowing significantly more general paths, including branching and cycles, thus enabling a highly efficient encoding of our computational model. However, this requires more sophisticated techniques for analysing the spectrum of the resulting Hamiltonian. To address this, we introduce a framework of graphs with unitary edge labels. After relating our Hamiltonian to the Laplacian of such a unitary labelled graph, we analyse its spectrum by combining matrix analysis and spectral graph theory techniques.

arXiv:1605.01718•Annales Henri Poincaré•Oct 29, 2017•23 citations

The Complexity of Single-Interaction Hamiltonians

Elad Hecker

We study the complexity of Local Hamiltonian problems under the restriction that every local term is an unweighted occurrence of the same fixed interaction. In the resulting Single-Interaction Hamiltonian (SIH) model, once the interaction is fixed, the Hamiltonian is specified entirely by its ordered interaction hypergraph. Our main technical tool is an exact compiler that converts any fixed finite alphabet of local interactions into a single interaction. On a designated auxiliary subspace, the compiled Hamiltonian reproduces the source Hamiltonian exactly, while the complete spectrum below a chosen separation scale is preserved with multiplicity. Combined with a finite-alphabet normalization, this gives a universal polynomial-time reduction from $k$-Local Hamiltonian to SIH$_{3k+3}$ up to a known global energy scale and inverse-polynomial approximation. Sharper constructions give QMA-completeness of SIH$_3$ and of geometrically local SIH$_8$ with bounded degree and interaction range. In the stoquastic setting, we obtain StoqMA-completeness of Stoq-SIH$_3$ and QMA-completeness of 1-Pinned Stoq-SIH$_4$. We also establish hardness results for uniformly system-size-dependent interactions and derive single-interaction formulations of the Hamiltonian quantum PCP conjecture, frustration-free, exponentially precise, and guided Local Hamiltonian problems. These results show that independently chosen local matrices and independently tunable coupling strengths are not necessary for a broad range of Hamiltonian-complexity phenomena.

quant-pharXiv:2609.39592•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

The Quantum and Classical Complexity of Translationally Invariant Tiling and Hamiltonian Problems

Daniel Gottesman, Sandy Irani

We study the complexity of a class of problems involving satisfying constraints which remain the same under translations in one or more spatial directions. In this paper, we show hardness of a classical tiling problem on an (N x N) 2-dimensional grid and a quantum problem involving finding the ground state energy of a 1-dimensional quantum system of N particles. In both cases, the only input is N, provided in binary. We show that the classical problem is NEXP-complete and the quantum problem is QMAEXP-complete. Thus, an algorithm for these problems that runs in time polynomial in N (exponential in the input size) would imply EXP = NEXP or BQEXP = QMAEXP, respectively. Although tiling in general is already known to be NEXP-complete, to our knowledge, all previous reductions require that either the set of tiles and their constraints or some varying boundary conditions be given as part of the input. In the problem considered here, these are fixed, constant-sized parameters of the problem. Instead, the problem instance is encoded solely in the size of the system.

arXiv:0905.2419•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2009•59 citations
Despite progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. Even defining the problem is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally invariant Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; the number of bits nnn for the precision is the sole input to the problem. The complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for the physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in \mboxFEXP\mboxQMA−EXP\mbox{FEXP}^{\mbox{QMA-EXP}}\mboxFEXP\mboxQMA−EXP and is hard for \mboxFEXP\mboxNEXP\mbox{FEXP}^{\mbox{NEXP}}\mboxFEXP\mboxNEXP. This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input. As an ingredient in our construction, we study the problem of computing the ground energy of translationally invariant finite 1D chains. A single Hamiltonian term, which is a fixed parameter of the problem, is applied to every pair of particles in a finite chain. The length of the chain is the sole input to the problem and the task is to compute an approximation of the ground energy. No thresholds are provided as in the standard formulation of the local Hamiltonian problem. We show that this problem is contained in \mboxFP\mboxQMA−EXP\mbox{FP}^{\mbox{QMA-EXP}}\mboxFP\mboxQMA−EXP and is hard for \mboxFP\mboxNEXP\mbox{FP}^{\mbox{NEXP}}\mboxFP\mboxNEXP. Our techniques employ a circular clock in which the ground energy is calibrated by the length of the cycle. This requires more precise expressions for the ground states of the resulting matrices than was required for previous QMA-completeness constructions and even exact analytical bounds for the infinite case which we derive using techniques from spectral graph theory. To our knowledge, this is the first use of the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction which shows hardness for a function class.
Despite immense progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity in the past decade, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. In fact, even defining the problem properly is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally-invariant (TI) Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; this precision (given by n the number of bits of the approximation) is the sole input to the problem. Understanding the complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for a physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in FEXP QMA-EXP and is hard for FEXP NEXP . This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input. As an ingredient in our construction, we study the problem of computing the ground energy of translationally invariant finite 1D chains. A single Hamiltonian term, which is a fixed parameter of the problem, is applied to every pair of particles in a finite chain. In the finite case, the length of the chain is the sole input to the problem and the task is to compute an approximation of the ground energy. No thresholds are provided as in the standard formulation of the local Hamiltonian problem. We show that this problem is contained in FP QMA-EXP and is hard for FP NEXP . Our techniques employ a circular clock structure in which the ground energy is calibrated by the length of the cycle. This requires more precise expressions for the ground energies of the resulting matrices than were required for previous QMA-completeness constructions and even exact analytical bounds for the infinite case which we derive using techniques from spectral graph theory. To our knowledge, this is the first use of the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that shows hardness for a function class.
Despite immense progress in quantum Hamiltonian complexity in the past decade, little is known about the computational complexity of quantum physics at the thermodynamic limit. In fact, even defining the problem properly is not straight forward. We study the complexity of estimating the ground energy of a fixed, translationally-invariant (TI) Hamiltonian in the thermodynamic limit, to within a given precision; this precision (given by n the number of bits of the approximation) is the sole input to the problem. Understanding the complexity of this problem captures how difficult it is for a physicist to measure or compute another digit in the approximation of a physical quantity in the thermodynamic limit. We show that this problem is contained in FEXPQMA-EXP and is hard for FEXPNEXP. This means that the problem is doubly exponentially hard in the size of the input.
It is known that three fundamental questions regarding local Hamiltonians -- approximating the ground state energy (the Local Hamiltonian problem), simulating local measurements on the ground space (APX-SIM), and deciding if the low energy space has an energy barrier (GSCON) -- are QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA-hard, PQMA[log]\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{QMA}[log]}PQMA[log]-hard and QCMA\mathsf{QCMA}QCMA-hard, respectively, meaning they are likely intractable even on a quantum computer. Yet while hardness for the Local Hamiltonian problem is known to hold even for translationally-invariant systems, it is not yet known whether APX-SIM and GSCON remain hard in such "simple" systems. In this work, we show that the translationally invariant versions of both APX-SIM and GSCON remain intractable, namely are PQMAEXP\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{QMA}_{\mathsf{EXP}}}PQMAEXP​- and QCMAEXP\mathsf{QCMA}_{\mathsf{EXP}}QCMAEXP​-complete, respectively. Each of these results is attained by giving a respective generic "lifting theorem" for producing hardness results. For APX-SIM, for example, we give a framework for "lifting" any abstract local circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping HHH (satisfying mild assumptions) to hardness of APX-SIM on the family of Hamiltonians produced by HHH, while preserving the structural and geometric properties of HHH (e.g. translation invariance, geometry, locality, etc). Each result also leverages counterintuitive properties of our constructions: for APX-SIM, we "compress" the answers to polynomially many parallel queries to a QMA oracle into a single qubit. For GSCON, we give a hardness construction robust against highly non-local unitaries, i.e. even if the adversary acts on all but one qudit in the system in each step.
We prove that estimating the ground state energy of a translationally invariant, nearest-neighbour Hamiltonian on a 1D spin chain is QMAEXP\textsf {QMA}_{{\textsf {EXP}}}QMAEXP​ -complete, even for systems of low local dimension ( ≈40\approx 40≈40 ). This is an improvement over the best previously known result by several orders of magnitude, and it shows that spin-glass-like frustration can occur in translationally invariant quantum systems with a local dimension comparable to the smallest-known non-translationally invariant systems with similar behaviour. While previous constructions of such systems rely on standard models of quantum computation, we construct a new model that is particularly well-suited for encoding quantum computation into the ground state of a translationally invariant system. This allows us to shift the proof burden from optimizing the Hamiltonian encoding a standard computational model, to proving universality of a simple model. Previous techniques for encoding quantum computation into the ground state of a local Hamiltonian allow only a linear sequence of gates, hence only a linear (or nearly linear) path in the graph of all computational states. We extend these techniques by allowing significantly more general paths, including branching and cycles, thus enabling a highly efficient encoding of our computational model. However, this requires more sophisticated techniques for analysing the spectrum of the resulting Hamiltonian. To address this, we introduce a framework of graphs with unitary edge labels. After relating our Hamiltonian to the Laplacian of such a unitary labelled graph, we analyse its spectrum by combining matrix analysis and spectral graph theory techniques.
We study the complexity of Local Hamiltonian problems under the restriction that every local term is an unweighted occurrence of the same fixed interaction. In the resulting Single-Interaction Hamiltonian (SIH) model, once the interaction is fixed, the Hamiltonian is specified entirely by its ordered interaction hypergraph. Our main technical tool is an exact compiler that converts any fixed finite alphabet of local interactions into a single interaction. On a designated auxiliary subspace, the compiled Hamiltonian reproduces the source Hamiltonian exactly, while the complete spectrum below a chosen separation scale is preserved with multiplicity. Combined with a finite-alphabet normalization, this gives a universal polynomial-time reduction from kkk-Local Hamiltonian to SIH3k+3_{3k+3}3k+3​ up to a known global energy scale and inverse-polynomial approximation. Sharper constructions give QMA-completeness of SIH3_33​ and of geometrically local SIH8_88​ with bounded degree and interaction range. In the stoquastic setting, we obtain StoqMA-completeness of Stoq-SIH3_33​ and QMA-completeness of 1-Pinned Stoq-SIH4_44​. We also establish hardness results for uniformly system-size-dependent interactions and derive single-interaction formulations of the Hamiltonian quantum PCP conjecture, frustration-free, exponentially precise, and guided Local Hamiltonian problems. These results show that independently chosen local matrices and independently tunable coupling strengths are not necessary for a broad range of Hamiltonian-complexity phenomena.
We study the complexity of a class of problems involving satisfying constraints which remain the same under translations in one or more spatial directions. In this paper, we show hardness of a classical tiling problem on an (N x N) 2-dimensional grid and a quantum problem involving finding the ground state energy of a 1-dimensional quantum system of N particles. In both cases, the only input is N, provided in binary. We show that the classical problem is NEXP-complete and the quantum problem is QMAEXP-complete. Thus, an algorithm for these problems that runs in time polynomial in N (exponential in the input size) would imply EXP = NEXP or BQEXP = QMAEXP, respectively. Although tiling in general is already known to be NEXP-complete, to our knowledge, all previous reductions require that either the set of tiles and their constraints or some varying boundary conditions be given as part of the input. In the problem considered here, these are fixed, constant-sized parameters of the problem. Instead, the problem instance is encoded solely in the size of the system.