Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum nonseparability: How the problem evolved from Einstein's time to ours

Bernard d’Espagnat

Published Dec 1, 1976• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Indeterminism, Nonseparability and the Einstein-Podolsky - Rosen Paradox

Tullio Weber

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Interaction-free evolving states of a bipartite system

Anna Napoli, M. Guccione, Antonio Messina +1 more

We show that two interacting physical systems may admit entangled pure or nonseparable mixed states evolving in time as if the mutual interaction Hamiltonian were absent. In this paper we define these interaction-free evolving (IFE) states and characterize their existence for a generic binary system described by a time-independent Hamiltonian. A comparison between IFE subspace and the decoherence-free subspace is reported. The set of all pure IFE states is explicitly constructed for a nonhomogeneous spin-star-system model

arXiv:1402.6448•Physical Review A•Jun 5, 2014•9 citations

The Logic of Quantum Nonseparability

Asher Peres

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

Possible Views on Nonseparability

Bernard d’Espagnat

As a matter of fact, no serious description of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen problem uses the incriminated postulate that the state vector is objective. The most straightforward case is that of realism. Realism, however, is not universally accepted. In Neil Bohr's philosophy, nonseparability is also present, but it has a very different meaning. The nonseparability of the quantum world is thus transferred, in this philosophy, from the system of the microparticles to the systems that each of these micro-objects constitutes with its instrument. In regard to Lorentz invariance, the transition from the pure case to the mixture—the reduction of the wave packet—raises less acute problems in Bohr's philosophy than it does in other approaches. Moreover, Bohr's philosophy obviously implies some restrictions on our freedom to imagine an independent external reality. The reason for this is that this conception endows the instruments with virtues that clearly transcend their status as mere physical systems —indeed, it ultimately defines instruments with reference to the desires.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Forms of Quantum Nonseparability and Related Philosophical Consequences

Vassilios Karakostas

arXiv:quant-ph/0502099•Journal for General Philosophy of Science•Sep 1, 2004•18 citations

Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseparability and a quantitative statement of Bohr's principle

William K. Wootters, Wojciech Hubert Zurek

A detailed analysis of Einstein's version of the double-slit experiment, in which one tries to observe both wave and particle properties of light, is performed. Quantum nonseparability appears in the derivation of the interference pattern, which proves to be surprisingly sharp even when the trajectories of the photons have been determined with fairly high accuracy. An information-theoretic approach to this problem leads to a quantitative formulation of Bohr's complementarity principle for the case of the double-slit experiment. A practically realizable version of this experiment, to which the above analysis applies, is proposed.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jan 15, 1979•617 citations
We show that two interacting physical systems may admit entangled pure or nonseparable mixed states evolving in time as if the mutual interaction Hamiltonian were absent. In this paper we define these interaction-free evolving (IFE) states and characterize their existence for a generic binary system described by a time-independent Hamiltonian. A comparison between IFE subspace and the decoherence-free subspace is reported. The set of all pure IFE states is explicitly constructed for a nonhomogeneous spin-star-system model
As a matter of fact, no serious description of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen problem uses the incriminated postulate that the state vector is objective. The most straightforward case is that of realism. Realism, however, is not universally accepted. In Neil Bohr's philosophy, nonseparability is also present, but it has a very different meaning. The nonseparability of the quantum world is thus transferred, in this philosophy, from the system of the microparticles to the systems that each of these micro-objects constitutes with its instrument. In regard to Lorentz invariance, the transition from the pure case to the mixture—the reduction of the wave packet—raises less acute problems in Bohr's philosophy than it does in other approaches. Moreover, Bohr's philosophy obviously implies some restrictions on our freedom to imagine an independent external reality. The reason for this is that this conception endows the instruments with virtues that clearly transcend their status as mere physical systems —indeed, it ultimately defines instruments with reference to the desires.
A detailed analysis of Einstein's version of the double-slit experiment, in which one tries to observe both wave and particle properties of light, is performed. Quantum nonseparability appears in the derivation of the interference pattern, which proves to be surprisingly sharp even when the trajectories of the photons have been determined with fairly high accuracy. An information-theoretic approach to this problem leads to a quantitative formulation of Bohr's complementarity principle for the case of the double-slit experiment. A practically realizable version of this experiment, to which the above analysis applies, is proposed.