Benchmarks and Controls for Optimization with Quantum Annealing

Arnab Das, Bikas K. Chakrabarti

Erica Grant, Travis S. Humble, Benjamin Stump

Quantum annealing offers an approach to finding the optimal solutions for a variety of computational problems, where the quantum annealing controls influence the observed performance and error mechanisms by tuning the underlying quantum dynamics. However, the influence of the available controls is often poorly understood, and methods for evaluating the effects of these controls are necessary to tune quantum computational performance. Here we use portfolio optimization as a case study by which to benchmark quantum annealing controls and their relative effects on computational accuracy. We compare empirical results from the D-Wave $2000{\mathrm{Q}}^{\mathrm{TM}}$ quantum annealer to the computational ground truth for a variety of portfolio optimization instances. We evaluate both forward and reverse annealing methods and we identify control variations that yield optimal performance in terms of probability of success and probability of chain breaks.

Tameem Albash

Glen Bigan Mbeng, Rosario Fazio, Giuseppe E. Santoro

We show how a digitized version of Quantum Annealing can be made optimal, realizing the best possible solution allowed by quantum mechanics in the shortest time, without any prior knowledge on the location and properties of the spectral gap. Our findings elucidate the intimate relation between digitized-QA, optimal Quantum Control, and recently proposed hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms for quantum-state preparation and optimization. We illustrate this on the simple benchmark problem of an unfrustrated antiferromagnetic Ising chain in a transverse field.

Rudraksh Sharma

Combinatorial optimization is a foundation of numerous scientific, industrial, and social decision-making questions, but its usefulness is mostly restricted by the exponential complexity of the problem of classical computability. The quantum annealing (QA) has become one of the leading analogue quantum systems to address such problems, whereby optimization problems are converted into physical energy structures and quantum fluctuations are utilized to perform systematic exploration. It provides a critical, synthesized, and comprehensive review of quantum annealing as applied to combinatorial optimization, including the theoretical basis, hardware designs, algorithm methods, issues of embedding and encoding, benchmarking procedures, applications, and integration with quantum algorithms based on gates and solvers on a classical computer. We build a comprehensive taxonomy between adiabatic dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to state-of-the-art flux-qubit annealers, new architectures, and hybrid quantum classical pipelines. We show that the overhead of embedding and encoding and the benchmarking approach taken are the most significant factors in determining scalability and performance, but not the raw number of qubits. Transportation, energy systems, robotics, finance, pharmacological discovery, and machine learning are just some examples of the domain-specific case studies that use QA with minimal empirical utility as a hybrid refinement engine and not an independent solver. Moreover, we introduce a stringent evaluation of the existing benchmarking culture, clarify the causal links between QA and QAOA as well as between VQE and structural predicaments, and reveal the institutional roots of the existing restrictions. We conclude by identifying a research roadmap in the future, focusing on the annealing hardness characterization, Stoquastic control manipulation, embedding rules automation, architecture design, and development of principled quantum advantage. It creates a benchmark reference to those in the field and research and deployment of scalable, reliable, and application-relevant quantum optimization

Hamzeh Alavirad, Maryam Bahrami Zanjani

We benchmark current annealing-based optimization workflows on a greenhouse-inspired quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem for binary heater scheduling, where the horizon H denotes the number of hourly control decisions. For the main one-day instance (H=24), all solver outputs are decoded back into heater schedules and evaluated in the original greenhouse simulator using the same physical objective and feasibility criterion. Classical simulated annealing and path-integral simulated quantum annealing produce feasible near-optimal solutions in all repetitions, with best objectives close to the exact optimum. In contrast, the tested D-Wave Leap Hybrid BQM workflow is less reliable and does not outperform the classical baselines under 15--60~s requested time limits. Direct D-Wave QPU execution on reduced instances remains feasible in all runs and recovers the exact optimum for H=10 and H=12, but the exact-hit rate drops from 5/10 to 2/10 and then to 0/10 at H=14, with substantially higher variance than the classical baselines. The results do not indicate quantum advantage, but provide a reproducible, physically decoded benchmark that exposes the current strengths and limitations of classical, hybrid, and direct quantum annealing workflows on structured control QUBOs.