Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2007.03005 · Physical Review Applied

Benchmarking Quantum Annealing Controls with Portfolio Optimization

Erica Grant, Travis S. Humble, Benjamin Stump

Published Jan 8, 2021• 90 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum annealing offers an approach to finding the optimal solutions for a variety of computational problems, where the quantum annealing controls influence the observed performance and error mechanisms by tuning the underlying quantum dynamics. However, the influence of the available controls is often poorly understood, and methods for evaluating the effects of these controls are necessary to tune quantum computational performance. Here we use portfolio optimization as a case study by which to benchmark quantum annealing controls and their relative effects on computational accuracy. We compare empirical results from the D-Wave $2000{\mathrm{Q}}^{\mathrm{TM}}$ quantum annealer to the computational ground truth for a variety of portfolio optimization instances. We evaluate both forward and reverse annealing methods and we identify control variations that yield optimal performance in terms of probability of success and probability of chain breaks.

DOI
10.1103/physrevapplied.15.014012

Related papers

Quantum Portfolio Optimization: An Extensive Benchmark

Eric Stopfer, Wagner, Friedrich

Recently, several researchers proposed portfolio optimization as a potential use case for quantum optimization. However, the literature is lacking an extensive benchmark quantifying the potential of quantum computers for portfolio optimization. In this work, we contribute to closing this gap. We provide a computational study, comparing quantum approaches against state-of-the-art classical methods on a meaningful, real-world instance set. In particular, we compare quantum annealing and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm against classical mixed-integer programming, simulated annealing, steepest descent local search, tabu search and a problem-tailored heuristic. We consider a variance-minimizing variant of portfolio optimization which we show to be more difficult to solve for classical optimizers than return-maximizing or multi-objective formulations. Our benchmark data set comprises 270 instances with up to 1,000 assets from actual stock data. Due to hardware limitation, quantum methods could only be tested for instances with at most 30 assets. The results show that all instances can be solved to proven optimality by mixed-integer programming in the order of seconds. Moreover, the problem-tailored heuristic consistently outperforms quantum approaches in terms of solution quality for fixed runtime. Thus, we conclude that there is only very limited room for a potential quantum advantage for the considered variant of portfolio optimization.

arXiv:2509.17876•Sep 22, 2025•1 citation

Benchmarking Embedded Chain Breaking in Quantum Annealing

Erica Grant, Travis S. Humble

Quantum annealing solves combinatorial optimization problems by finding the energetic ground states of an embedded Hamiltonian. However, quantum annealing dynamics under the embedded Hamiltonian may violate the principles of adiabatic evolution and generate excitations that correspond to errors in the computed solution. Here we empirically benchmark the probability of chain breaks and identify sweet spots for solving a suite of embedded Hamiltonians. We further correlate the physical location of chain breaks in the quantum annealing hardware with the underlying embedding technique and use these localized rates in a tailored post-processing strategies. Our results demonstrate how to use characterization of the quantum annealing hardware to tune the embedded Hamiltonian and remove computational errors.

arXiv:2104.03258•Apr 7, 2021•2 citations

Benchmarking embedded chain breaking in quantum annealing *

Erica Grant, Travis S. Humble

Abstract Quantum annealing solves combinatorial optimization problems by finding the energetic ground states of an embedded Hamiltonian. However, quantum annealing dynamics under the embedded Hamiltonian may violate the principles of adiabatic evolution and generate excitations that correspond to errors in the computed solution. Here we empirically benchmark the probability of chain breaks and identify sweet spots for solving a suite of embedded Hamiltonians. We further correlate the physical location of chain breaks in the quantum annealing hardware with the underlying embedding technique and use these localized rates in a tailored post-processing strategies. Our results demonstrate how to use characterization of the quantum annealing hardware to tune the embedded Hamiltonian and remove computational errors.

Quantum Science and Technology•Sep 15, 2021•20 citations

Extending the computational reach of Quantum Annealing using Reverse Annealing

Lucas Joshua Menger, Thomas Lippert, Manpreet Singh Jattana

Quantum annealing is a promising heuristic for combinatorial optimization, but on current hardware its performance degrades for larger and more complex problems due to noise and small energy gaps. Reverse annealing has been proposed as a refinement strategy, yet it remains unclear when it provides systematic advantages over standard forward annealing or simply increasing annealing time. We find that combining forward and reverse annealing consistently improves solution quality and efficiency across multiple problem classes. The benefits of reverse annealing increase with problem complexity and are strongest in regimes where forward annealing is increasingly limited. Moreover, reverse annealing yields larger efficiency gains than simply extending forward annealing times. We establish these results through a systematic experimental study on a D-Wave Advantage system, benchmarking reverse annealing across Max-Cut, Number Partitioning, and sparse clustering problems while varying reverse distance, pause duration, and annealing time. We identify a narrow optimal regime for reverse annealing parameters linked to the location of freeze-out points and energy-level crossings in the annealing schedule. These findings demonstrate that reverse annealing is most valuable for large, high-complexity optimization problems and is likely to gain importance as quantum annealing hardware scales toward more realistic applications.

quant-pharXiv:2607.02146•EPJ Quantum Technology•Jul 3, 2026•0 citations

Comparative analysis of diverse methodologies for portfolio optimization leveraging quantum annealing techniques

Zhijie Tang, Alex Lu Dou, Arit Kumar Bishwas

Portfolio optimization (PO) is extensively employed in financial services to assist in achieving investment objectives. By providing an optimal asset allocation, PO effectively balances the risk and returns associated with investments. However, it is important to note that as the number of involved assets and constraints increases, the portfolio optimization problem can become increasingly difficult to solve, falling into the category of NP-hard problems. In such scenarios, classical algorithms, such as the Monte Carlo method, exhibit limitations in addressing this challenge when the number of stocks in the portfolio grows. Quantum annealing algorithm holds promise for solving complex portfolio optimization problems in the NISQ era. Many studies have demonstrated the advantages of various quantum annealing algorithm variations over the standard quantum annealing approach. In this work, we conduct a numerical investigation of randomly generated unconstrained single-period discrete mean-variance portfolio optimization instances. We explore the application of a variety of unconventional quantum annealing algorithms, employing both forward annealing and reverse annealing schedules. By comparing the time-to-solution(TTS) and success probabilities of diverse approaches, we show that certain methods exhibit advantages in enhancing the success probability when utilizing conventional forward annealing schedules. Furthermore, we find that the implementation of reverse annealing schedules can significantly improve the performance of select unconventional quantum annealing algorithms.

arXiv:2403.02599•Mar 5, 2024•0 citations

Exploring Quantum Annealing Techniques for Financial Portfolio Optimization

UMA RAMAN, Saif O. Husain, Venkata Siva Bathula +3 more

Quantum annealing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm for solving large-scale combinatorial optimization problems that are intractable for classical algorithms. Financial portfolio optimization, which involves balancing expected returns against risk under multiple practical constraints, represents one of the most challenging optimization tasks in quantitative finance. Traditional approaches based on mean-variance theory, heuristic meta-optimization, and classical quadratic programming often struggle to scale efficiently as the dimensionality of assets and constraints increases. This study explores the application of quantum annealing techniques to financial portfolio optimization by formulating the problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization model suitable for quantum hardware. The paper provides a systematic mapping of portfolio objectives and constraints into the Ising Hamiltonian framework and analyzes how quantum tunneling and probabilistic state transitions can enhance convergence toward near-global optima. Comparative insights between classical solvers and quantum annealing-based approaches are discussed in terms of solution quality, computational efficiency, and scalability. Furthermore, the study highlights current hardware limitations, embedding challenges, and noise effects that influence optimization performance. The findings indicate that quantum annealing offers substantial potential for accelerating portfolio optimization in high-dimensional financial systems, particularly in scenarios involving complex constraints and dynamic market conditions, thereby establishing a foundation for future quantum-driven financial decision-support systems.

International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations
Quantum annealing offers an approach to finding the optimal solutions for a variety of computational problems, where the quantum annealing controls influence the observed performance and error mechanisms by tuning the underlying quantum dynamics. However, the influence of the available controls is often poorly understood, and methods for evaluating the effects of these controls are necessary to tune quantum computational performance. Here we use portfolio optimization as a case study by which to benchmark quantum annealing controls and their relative effects on computational accuracy. We compare empirical results from the D-Wave 2000QTM2000{\mathrm{Q}}^{\mathrm{TM}}2000QTM quantum annealer to the computational ground truth for a variety of portfolio optimization instances. We evaluate both forward and reverse annealing methods and we identify control variations that yield optimal performance in terms of probability of success and probability of chain breaks.
Recently, several researchers proposed portfolio optimization as a potential use case for quantum optimization. However, the literature is lacking an extensive benchmark quantifying the potential of quantum computers for portfolio optimization. In this work, we contribute to closing this gap. We provide a computational study, comparing quantum approaches against state-of-the-art classical methods on a meaningful, real-world instance set. In particular, we compare quantum annealing and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm against classical mixed-integer programming, simulated annealing, steepest descent local search, tabu search and a problem-tailored heuristic. We consider a variance-minimizing variant of portfolio optimization which we show to be more difficult to solve for classical optimizers than return-maximizing or multi-objective formulations. Our benchmark data set comprises 270 instances with up to 1,000 assets from actual stock data. Due to hardware limitation, quantum methods could only be tested for instances with at most 30 assets. The results show that all instances can be solved to proven optimality by mixed-integer programming in the order of seconds. Moreover, the problem-tailored heuristic consistently outperforms quantum approaches in terms of solution quality for fixed runtime. Thus, we conclude that there is only very limited room for a potential quantum advantage for the considered variant of portfolio optimization.
Quantum annealing solves combinatorial optimization problems by finding the energetic ground states of an embedded Hamiltonian. However, quantum annealing dynamics under the embedded Hamiltonian may violate the principles of adiabatic evolution and generate excitations that correspond to errors in the computed solution. Here we empirically benchmark the probability of chain breaks and identify sweet spots for solving a suite of embedded Hamiltonians. We further correlate the physical location of chain breaks in the quantum annealing hardware with the underlying embedding technique and use these localized rates in a tailored post-processing strategies. Our results demonstrate how to use characterization of the quantum annealing hardware to tune the embedded Hamiltonian and remove computational errors.
Abstract Quantum annealing solves combinatorial optimization problems by finding the energetic ground states of an embedded Hamiltonian. However, quantum annealing dynamics under the embedded Hamiltonian may violate the principles of adiabatic evolution and generate excitations that correspond to errors in the computed solution. Here we empirically benchmark the probability of chain breaks and identify sweet spots for solving a suite of embedded Hamiltonians. We further correlate the physical location of chain breaks in the quantum annealing hardware with the underlying embedding technique and use these localized rates in a tailored post-processing strategies. Our results demonstrate how to use characterization of the quantum annealing hardware to tune the embedded Hamiltonian and remove computational errors.
Quantum annealing is a promising heuristic for combinatorial optimization, but on current hardware its performance degrades for larger and more complex problems due to noise and small energy gaps. Reverse annealing has been proposed as a refinement strategy, yet it remains unclear when it provides systematic advantages over standard forward annealing or simply increasing annealing time. We find that combining forward and reverse annealing consistently improves solution quality and efficiency across multiple problem classes. The benefits of reverse annealing increase with problem complexity and are strongest in regimes where forward annealing is increasingly limited. Moreover, reverse annealing yields larger efficiency gains than simply extending forward annealing times. We establish these results through a systematic experimental study on a D-Wave Advantage system, benchmarking reverse annealing across Max-Cut, Number Partitioning, and sparse clustering problems while varying reverse distance, pause duration, and annealing time. We identify a narrow optimal regime for reverse annealing parameters linked to the location of freeze-out points and energy-level crossings in the annealing schedule. These findings demonstrate that reverse annealing is most valuable for large, high-complexity optimization problems and is likely to gain importance as quantum annealing hardware scales toward more realistic applications.
Portfolio optimization (PO) is extensively employed in financial services to assist in achieving investment objectives. By providing an optimal asset allocation, PO effectively balances the risk and returns associated with investments. However, it is important to note that as the number of involved assets and constraints increases, the portfolio optimization problem can become increasingly difficult to solve, falling into the category of NP-hard problems. In such scenarios, classical algorithms, such as the Monte Carlo method, exhibit limitations in addressing this challenge when the number of stocks in the portfolio grows. Quantum annealing algorithm holds promise for solving complex portfolio optimization problems in the NISQ era. Many studies have demonstrated the advantages of various quantum annealing algorithm variations over the standard quantum annealing approach. In this work, we conduct a numerical investigation of randomly generated unconstrained single-period discrete mean-variance portfolio optimization instances. We explore the application of a variety of unconventional quantum annealing algorithms, employing both forward annealing and reverse annealing schedules. By comparing the time-to-solution(TTS) and success probabilities of diverse approaches, we show that certain methods exhibit advantages in enhancing the success probability when utilizing conventional forward annealing schedules. Furthermore, we find that the implementation of reverse annealing schedules can significantly improve the performance of select unconventional quantum annealing algorithms.
Quantum annealing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm for solving large-scale combinatorial optimization problems that are intractable for classical algorithms. Financial portfolio optimization, which involves balancing expected returns against risk under multiple practical constraints, represents one of the most challenging optimization tasks in quantitative finance. Traditional approaches based on mean-variance theory, heuristic meta-optimization, and classical quadratic programming often struggle to scale efficiently as the dimensionality of assets and constraints increases. This study explores the application of quantum annealing techniques to financial portfolio optimization by formulating the problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization model suitable for quantum hardware. The paper provides a systematic mapping of portfolio objectives and constraints into the Ising Hamiltonian framework and analyzes how quantum tunneling and probabilistic state transitions can enhance convergence toward near-global optima. Comparative insights between classical solvers and quantum annealing-based approaches are discussed in terms of solution quality, computational efficiency, and scalability. Furthermore, the study highlights current hardware limitations, embedding challenges, and noise effects that influence optimization performance. The findings indicate that quantum annealing offers substantial potential for accelerating portfolio optimization in high-dimensional financial systems, particularly in scenarios involving complex constraints and dynamic market conditions, thereby establishing a foundation for future quantum-driven financial decision-support systems.