Quantum annealing is a promising heuristic for combinatorial optimization, but on current hardware its performance degrades for larger and more complex problems due to noise and small energy gaps. Reverse annealing has been proposed as a refinement strategy, yet it remains unclear when it provides systematic advantages over standard forward annealing or simply increasing annealing time. We find that combining forward and reverse annealing consistently improves solution quality and efficiency across multiple problem classes. The benefits of reverse annealing increase with problem complexity and are strongest in regimes where forward annealing is increasingly limited. Moreover, reverse annealing yields larger efficiency gains than simply extending forward annealing times. We establish these results through a systematic experimental study on a D-Wave Advantage system, benchmarking reverse annealing across Max-Cut, Number Partitioning, and sparse clustering problems while varying reverse distance, pause duration, and annealing time. We identify a narrow optimal regime for reverse annealing parameters linked to the location of freeze-out points and energy-level crossings in the annealing schedule. These findings demonstrate that reverse annealing is most valuable for large, high-complexity optimization problems and is likely to gain importance as quantum annealing hardware scales toward more realistic applications.
Quantum annealing is a promising heuristic for combinatorial optimization, but on current hardware its performance degrades for larger and more complex problems due to noise and small energy gaps. Reverse annealing has been proposed as a refinement strategy, yet it remains unclear when it provides systematic advantages over standard forward annealing or simply increasing annealing time. We find that combining forward and reverse annealing consistently improves solution quality and efficiency across multiple problem classes. The benefits of reverse annealing increase with problem complexity and are strongest in regimes where forward annealing is increasingly limited. Moreover, reverse annealing yields larger efficiency gains than simply extending forward annealing times. We establish these results through a systematic experimental study on a D-Wave Advantage system, benchmarking reverse annealing across Max-Cut, Number Partitioning, and sparse clustering problems while varying reverse distance, pause duration, and annealing time. We identify a narrow optimal regime for reverse annealing parameters linked to the location of freeze-out points and energy-level crossings in the annealing schedule. These findings demonstrate that reverse annealing is most valuable for large, high-complexity optimization problems and is likely to gain importance as quantum annealing hardware scales toward more realistic applications.
Quantum annealers conventionally use forward annealing to generate heuristic solutions. Reverse annealing can potentially generate better solutions but necessitates an appropriate initial state. Ways to find such states are generally unknown or highly problem dependent, offer limited success, and severely restrict the scope of reverse annealing. We use a general method that improves the overall solution quality and quantity by feeding reverse annealing with low-quality solutions obtained from forward annealing. An experimental demonstration of solving the graph coloring problem using the D-Wave quantum annealers shows that our method is able to convert invalid solutions obtained from forward annealing to at least one valid solution obtained after assisted reverse annealing for 57% of 459 random Erdos–Rényi graphs. Our method significantly outperforms random initial states, obtains more unique solutions on average, and widens the applicability of reverse annealing. Although the average number of valid solutions obtained drops exponentially with the problem size, a scaling analysis for the graph coloring problem shows that our method effectively extends the computational reach of conventional forward annealing using reverse annealing.
Over the past decade, the usefulness of quantum annealing hardware for combinatorial optimization has been the subject of much debate. Thus far, experimental benchmarking studies have indicated that quantum annealing hardware does not provide an irrefutable performance gain over state-of-the-art optimization methods. However, as this hardware continues to evolve, each new iteration brings improved performance and warrants further benchmarking. To that end, this work conducts an optimization performance assessment of D-Wave Systems' most recent Advantage Performance Update computer, which can natively solve sparse unconstrained quadratic optimization problems with over 5,000 binary decision variables and 40,000 quadratic terms. We demonstrate that classes of contrived problems exist where this quantum annealer can provide run time benefits over a collection of established classical solution methods that represent the current state-of-the-art for benchmarking quantum annealing hardware. Although this work does not present strong evidence of an irrefutable performance benefit for this emerging optimization technology, it does exhibit encouraging progress, signaling the potential impacts on practical optimization tasks in the future.
Abstract Over the past decade, the usefulness of quantum annealing hardware for combinatorial optimization has been the subject of much debate. Thus far, experimental benchmarking studies have indicated that quantum annealing hardware does not provide an irrefutable performance gain over state-of-the-art optimization methods. However, as this hardware continues to evolve, each new iteration brings improved performance and warrants further benchmarking. To that end, this work conducts an optimization performance assessment of D-Wave Systems’ Advantage Performance Update computer, which can natively solve sparse unconstrained quadratic optimization problems with over 5,000 binary decision variables and 40,000 quadratic terms. We demonstrate that classes of contrived problems exist where this quantum annealer can provide run time benefits over a collection of established classical solution methods that represent the current state-of-the-art for benchmarking quantum annealing hardware. Although this work does not present strong evidence of an irrefutable performance benefit for this emerging optimization technology, it does exhibit encouraging progress, signaling the potential impacts on practical optimization tasks in the future.
Quantum computing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm with the potential to solve problems that are intractable for classical computers. This paper provides an overview of the current state of quantum computing, including its historical development, hardware advancements, applications, and challenges. Special attention is given to combinatorial optimization, which is considered one of the most promising application domains. The limitations of current quantum systems and future research directions are also discussed. This paper presents a comparative study between a conventional D-Wave-based simulated annealing approach and a proposed hybrid optimization model for solving largescale combinatorial optimization problems. The study focuses on benchmark problems, including AES, TSP gr24, and a real-world load balancing problem, all formulated as QUBO models. The D-Wave approach employs the dwave-neal simulated annealing engine with various parameter settings, while the proposed model introduces a decomposition-based framework combined with adaptive parameter control and iterative refinement. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model consistently outperforms the conventional approach in terms of solution quality, achieving significantly lower energy values across all problem instances. In particular, for the TSP gr24 problem, the proposed model achieves near-optimal solutions with substantially reduced computation time. For large-scale problems such as AES and load balancing, the proposed model maintains scalability and robustness, whereas the conventional approach suffers from increased computational cost and performance degradation. Although the proposed method introduces additional computational steps, its hybrid structure effectively mitigates limitations related to local minima, parameter sensitivity, and scalability. These findings indicate that integrating classical optimization techniques with quantum-inspired methods is essential for practical applications. The proposed model provides a promising framework for solving complex real-world optimization problems and highlights the importance of hybrid approaches in advancing quantum annealing technologies.
Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.
Advances in quantum annealing technology make it possible to obtain high quality approximate solutions of important NP-hard problems. With the newer generations of the D-Wave annealer, more advanced features are available which allow the user to have greater control of the anneal process. In this contribution, we study how such features can help in improving the quality of the solutions returned by the annealer. Specifically, we focus on two of these features: reverse annealing and h-gain. Reverse annealing (RA) was designed to allow refining a known solution by backward annealing from a classical state representing the solution to a mid-anneal point where a transverse field is present, followed by an ordinary forward anneal, which is hoped to improve on the previous solution. The h-gain (HG) feature stands for time-dependent gain in Hamiltonian linear (h) biases and was originally developed to help study freezeout times and phase transitions in spin glasses. Here we apply HG to bias the quantum state in the beginning of the annealing process towards the known solution as in the RA case, but using a different apparatus. We also investigate a hybrid reverse annealing/h-gain schedule, which has a backward phase resembling an RA step and whose forward phase uses the HG idea. To optimize the parameters of the schedules, we employ a Bayesian optimization framework. We test all techniques on a variety of input problems including the weighted Maximum Cut problem and the weighted Maximum Clique problem. Our results show that each technique may dominate the others depending on the input instance, and that the HG technique is a viable alternative to RA for some problems.