Finite-length and asymptotic analysis and design of LDPC codes for binary erasure and fading channels.
Kaiann Fu
Abstract
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes in conjunction with iterative decoding based on message-passing algorithms have been shown to achieve excellent performance over a variety of communication channels. In this dissertation, we investigate LDPC codes under two scenarios which present different challenges for providing robust communications. First, LDPC codes are analyzed and designed for time-selective, frequency-nonselective complex-fading channels where both the amplitude and the phase of the transmitted signal are altered by the channel. To combat the fading, we use a pilot symbol-assisted scheme where known pilot symbols are added to the LDPC code and used to help estimate the channel at the receiver. Using asymptotic, infinite-length analysis, we investigate several iterative, message-passing, joint-estimation-and-decoding strategies; optimal energy distribution between pilot and data symbols; and LDPC code design. Several interesting results are obtained regarding unification of analysis and code design. Next, we address the issue of achieving very low error rates with practical, finite-length LDPC codes for binary erasure channels. Finite-length LDPC codes suffer from error floors which limit the achievable error rate, and this error-floor performance is determined by stopping sets. Asymptotic analysis of weight and stopping-set enumerators, for codewords and stopping sets which grow linearly with codelength, has aided in designing codes with lower error floors but does not reflect the behavior of sublinearly-sized stopping sets, which can dominate the iterative-decoding, error-floor performance. Thus, we provide a perspective on protograph-based and standard LDPC ensemble enumerators, based on analysis of stopping sets with sublinear growth, which brings new insight into sublinear stopping-set behavior, advantages of protograph structure, and effects of precoding. We show for stopping sets that grow at most logarithmically with codelength, the enumerators follow a polynomial relationship with codelength, unlike the exponential relationship for linearly-growing stopping sets, and this polynomial relationship can be approximately captured by a single parameter. Further, we begin to address the question, Given finite stopping-set sizes and finite codelengths, do the stopping sets follow the behavior predicted by linear or sublinear analysis?