Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Philosophical Review

Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics.

Kent A. Peacock, Tim Maudlin

Published Apr 1, 1996• 65 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/2185728

Related papers

Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Second Edition

Tim Maudlin

•Feb 11, 2002•8 citations

Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics. Aristotelian Society Series, vol. 13

Kent A. Peacock

The Philosophical Review•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Einstein and non-locality in the quantum theory

David Böhm, Basil J. Hiley

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1980•0 citations

Tim Maudlin,Quantum Non‐Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics(Aristotelian Society Series, Volume 13), Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell, 1994, 255 + xi pp.

Andrew Wayne

Noûs•Dec 1, 1997•2 citations

The philosophical implications of quantum non-locality

Paul Christopher Jeffries

•Jul 1, 2000•0 citations

How to Be a Relationalist

Shamik Dasgupta

Relationalism in metaphysics leads to indeterminism and non-locality in physics. This is widely thought to be a problem for relationalism, but here I argue that it is in fact a?virtue. More specifically, I distinguish two senses in which a physical theory can be indeterministic and non-local. Relationalism does imply indeterminism and non-locality in one sense, but this is a virtue since indeterminism and non-locality in this sense is precisely what empirical observation confirms. There is a second sense of the terms on which indeterminism and non-locality would be a problem, but I argue that relationalism does not imply indeterminism or non-locality in that sense. With respect to indeterminism and non-locality, then, relationalism gets things exactly right. This defense of relationalism rests on distinguishing these two senses of indeterminism and non-locality. Since both terms are intimately connected to metaphysical possibility, this requires distinguishing two species of the latter. The distinction between two senses of metaphysical possibility I offer may be of interest to metaphysicians regardless of its bearing on relationalism, determinism, and locality.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 21, 2020•8 citations
Relationalism in metaphysics leads to indeterminism and non-locality in physics. This is widely thought to be a problem for relationalism, but here I argue that it is in fact a?virtue. More specifically, I distinguish two senses in which a physical theory can be indeterministic and non-local. Relationalism does imply indeterminism and non-locality in one sense, but this is a virtue since indeterminism and non-locality in this sense is precisely what empirical observation confirms. There is a second sense of the terms on which indeterminism and non-locality would be a problem, but I argue that relationalism does not imply indeterminism or non-locality in that sense. With respect to indeterminism and non-locality, then, relationalism gets things exactly right. This defense of relationalism rests on distinguishing these two senses of indeterminism and non-locality. Since both terms are intimately connected to metaphysical possibility, this requires distinguishing two species of the latter. The distinction between two senses of metaphysical possibility I offer may be of interest to metaphysicians regardless of its bearing on relationalism, determinism, and locality.