One of the long-standing conundrums of science is the exact mathematical relationship of quantum mechanics to Newtonian physics, as well as to relativistic physics. Herein it is shown to be possible to use the Planck constant as represented by the quantum formula for photon energy, E=hc/λ , where h is the Planck constant, and using an approach similar to Bohr’s classical mechanical solution for the atom, to construct equations that show the mathematical relationship among all three in fundamental terms. This has the possibility of showing how relativity applied to Newtonian physics produces a quantum mechanical result, and may lead to a better understanding of quantum mechanics from a non-statistical approach, as well as possibly allowing a direct calculation of quantum gravity.
One of the long-standing conundrums of science is the exact mathematical relationship of quantum mechanics to Newtonian physics, as well as to relativistic physics. Herein it is shown to be possible to use the Planck constant as represented by the quantum formula for photon energy, E=hc/λ , where h is the Planck constant, and using an approach similar to Bohr’s classical mechanical solution for the atom, to construct equations that show the mathematical relationship among all three in fundamental terms. This has the possibility of showing how relativity applied to Newtonian physics produces a quantum mechanical result, and may lead to a better understanding of quantum mechanics from a non-statistical approach, as well as possibly allowing a direct calculation of quantum gravity.
This article is a continuation of Part(I) to demonstrate more aspects for a successful merge of classical mechanics to the quantum theory. The article starts first with the deduction of the general form of the complimentary energy, next a robust firm mathematical proof is given indicates that the complimentary energy has a wave nature and it is a potential energy, then the radiation condition has been determined, a vector formula expresses the corresponding force was deduced and this force was called adhesion force. A mathematical convergence process has proved the duality of the electromagnetic wave parameters and particle parameters, which results in the existence of a “wave-particle” object. While finding the relationship between the electromagnetic wave parameters and particle parameters, a mathematical relationship was found indicating that not every moving charged mass generates a magnetic field. This relationship for the mass was linked to the effective mass tensor, The geometric representation of the constant energy surface and its relationship to the energy levels of both the orbital model (Bohr model) and the cloud model for different geometric 3D shapes were investigated as a sample of the possible geometric interpretations of the energy equation, that is by employing the triangle method, it is possible to create a geometric representation of the constant energy surfaces. The relation between the energy levels, quantum numbers, and band width is represented geometrically. As a result of proving the relationship between the motion of an electromagnetic wave and the motion of a particle associated with the wave, two new, unprecedented mathematical formulas were developed. The first formula specifies a moving charged mass and its relationship to the resulting wavelength. Thus, the radius of the charged mass is obtained in terms of its wavelength and mass density. The second formula specifies the kinetic energy of a photon. The grand potentials are the potential energy of the Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation, Coulomb’s Law, and Inverse Square Law of Electromagnetic Waves Intensity. From the potential energy of Newton’s law of universal gravitation, the wavelength of the gravitational wave, as well as the wavelength of quantum gravity were deduced. A mathematical relationship was then deduced that determines the lengths of the functions of conic sections, and in particular the length of perimeter of ellipses. From the potential energy of Coulomb’s law of attraction, a mathematical formulation of the energy levels in general for any atom of an element was obtained. This mathematical formulation was compared with the results obtained by Bohr and Schrödinger for the hydrogen atom. As for the inverse square law of electromagnetic radiation intensity, several innovative mathematical equations have been deduced that link different parameters together. Following the contents of this article requires to be quite familiar with the contents of the first part with the same title, as well as a complete understanding of the concepts of intermediate parameters derived and used in the various equations. Otherwise, it will be extremely difficult to follow the contents of this article.
Re-examination of the work of Max Karl Planck has revealed hidden variables in his famous quantum work, consistent with Einstein's famous sentiment that quantum mechanics is incomplete due to the existence of "hidden variables". The recent discovery of these previously hidden variables, which have been missing from the foundational equations of quantum theory for more than one hundred years, has important implications for all the sciences as well as for understanding the interactions of electromagnetic radiation with matter. Planck's quantum formula, E = hν, is missing the variable for measurement time. Planck had included the missing time variable in his earlier electromagnetic work, but omitted it in his famous work that sparked the quantum revolution. Restoration of measurement time to Planck's quantum formula produces the more complete, E = h~ ν t. The numerical value Planck calculated for his action constant "h" takes on new meaning as an energy constant "h~" for light. Planck's energy constant is the mean energy of a single oscillation of light, namely 6.626 X 10-34 J/oscillation. The mean oscillation energy of light is constant, and does not vary with frequency or wavelength. The photon, as historically defined, is a time dependent packet of energy, based on the arbitrary measurement time of one second. An arbitrary, one second increment of energy cannot be a truly indivisible and elementary particle of nature. Omission of the time variable from Planck's quantum formula contributed to numerous paradoxes in quantum mechanics, such as uncertainty relating to formulations involving time, wave-particle duality, the need for normalization of wave functions, lack of dimensions for the fine structure constant, and irreconcilability of quantum mechanics and general relativity (Einstein's gravitational theory). Many of these paradoxes are simplified or eliminated altogether with a re-interpretation of quantum mechanics with Planck's hidden time variable and energy constant.
Abstract We explore the introduction of Planck’s constant via the study of black body radiation and the need for quantized energies, including the use of statistical mechanics methods to address this problem. This naturally leads to the Sackur Tetrode equation and the connections between entropy and quantum theory. The formalism of quantum mechanics is explored, focusing on the dimensionality of the otherwise formal mathematics involved. Bound states modelling important physical systems (such as the infinite well, harmonic oscillator, linear potential, and the quantum Coulomb problem) are explored in the context of dimensional analysis. The dimensionless phases inherent in quantum wavefunctions are discussed in the context of Planck’s constant, including discussions of some of the classic tests of quantum theory. Systems of units related to aspects of quantum mechanics, including Hartree and Planckian ones, are explored.
Abstract In stochastic mechanics, one of the interpretations of realistic quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation can be derived by assuming the Brownian motion (BM) of minute particles. In this study, we theoretically derive Planck’s constant (h), a fundamental constant of quantum physics, by assuming same BM. Einstein investigated the BM of a resonator caused by photons in a black body; meanwhile, in this study, BM is considered to be caused by the particle and wave natures of light. As a result, as the functional form of h, hN=cε04πe2β1 h N = 4 π e 2 c ε 0 1 β (e: elementary charge, ε0 ε 0 : permittivity, c: speed of light) was derived, where the undetermined coefficient 2β β 2 represents the probability that the interaction between electrons and electromagnetic waves becomes particle-like absorption in one cycle of oscillation. The theoretical value of h was calculated to be cε04πe2π3 4 π e 2 c ε 0 π 3 by obtaining β from the transition conditions of the BM model and uncertainty relation. This theoretical value is within 0.3% of the most recent value of h. Besides, Nelson’s assumed diffusion coefficient in the stochastic mechanics, which is essential in obtaining Schrödinger’s equation, was proved to be obtained from the BM model and the uncertainty relation. This finding and the conclusion that the Planck’s constant can be mathematically derived, provide support for Nelson’s stochastic mechanics.
Toward the end of the nineteenth century, it became clear that some experiments cannot be explained on the basis of known physics, now referred to as classical physics. In 1900, Max Planck was able to correctly describe the distribution of blackbody radiation energy as a function of wavelength λ or frequency ν = c/λ. He had to accept the existence of energy packets (quanta) with energy E = hν. A few years later, Albert Einstein found that this unexpected relation between energy and frequency is also necessary in order to understand photoemission from metallic surfaces. A decade later, Niels Bohr arrived at the correct equation for the electronic spectrum of the hydrogen atom by applying “quantum conditions” on the motion of the electron around the nucleus and the Planck’s relation E = hν on the energy difference between the energy levels (1916). A decade later, Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan introduced “quantum mechanics” and de Broglie and Schrödinger (1925-1926) introduced “wave mechanics.”