Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Berry Phases and Curvatures

David H. Vanderbilt

Published Oct 26, 2018• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/9781316662205.005

Related papers

Berry phases, geometric actions and applications

Luiz Agostinho Ferreira, Abraham Hirsz Zimerman, J. F. Gomes

•Nov 30, 1990•0 citations

Berry connection in atom-molecule systems

Fu-Cheng Cui, Biao Wu

In the mean-field theory of atom-molecule systems, where bosonic atoms combine to form molecules, there is no usual $\text{U}(1)$ symmetry, presenting an apparent hurdle for defining the Berry phase and Berry curvature for these systems. We define a Berry connection for this system, with which the Berry phase and Berry curvature can be naturally computed. We use a three-level atom-molecule system to illustrate our results. In particular, we have computed the mean-field Berry curvature of this system analytically, and compared it to the Berry curvature computed with the second-quantized model of the same system. An excellent agreement is found, indicating the validity of our definition.

Physical Review A•Aug 2, 2011•5 citations

THREE ELABORATIONS ON BERRY’S CONNECTION, CURVATURE AND PHASE

R. Jackiw

We discuss how symmetries and conservation laws are affected when Berry’s phase occurs in a quantum system: symmetry transformations of coordinates have to be supplemented by gauge transformations of Berry’s connection, and consequently constants of motion acquire terms beyond the familiar kinematical ones. We show how symmetries of a problem determine Berry’s connection, curvature and, once a specific path is chosen, the phase as well. Moreover, higher order corrections are also fixed. We demonstrate that in some instances Berry’s curvature and phase can be removed by a globally well-defined, time-dependent canonical transformation. Finally, we describe how field theoretic anomalies may be viewed as manifestations of Berry’s phase.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Feb 1, 1988•136 citations

The stability of Berry's phases

Stefan Giller, Cezary Gonera, Piotr Kosiński +1 more

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1994•0 citations

Berry phase from symmetry groups

Robert Olkiewicz

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1993•4 citations

Measuring Berry curvature with quantum Monte Carlo

Michael Kolodrubetz

The Berry curvature and its descendant, the Berry phase, play an important role in quantum mechanics. They can be used to understand the Aharonov-Bohm effect, define topological Chern numbers, and generally to investigate the geometric properties of a quantum ground state manifold. While Berry curvature has been well studied in the regimes of few-body physics and noninteracting particles, its use in the regime of strong interactions is hindered by the lack of numerical methods to solve for it. In this paper I fill this gap by implementing a quantum Monte Carlo method to solve for the Berry curvature, based on interpreting Berry curvature as a leading correction to imaginary time ramps. I demonstrate my algorithm using the transverse-field Ising model in one and two dimensions, the latter of which is nonintegrable. Despite the fact that the Berry curvature gives information about the phase of the wave function, I show that the algorithm has no sign or phase problem for standard sign-problem-free Hamiltonians. My algorithm scales similarly to conventional methods as a function of system size and energy gap, and therefore should prove a valuable tool in investigating the quantum geometry of many-body systems.

arXiv:1310.2644•Physical Review B•Jan 7, 2014•10 citations
In the mean-field theory of atom-molecule systems, where bosonic atoms combine to form molecules, there is no usual U(1)\text{U}(1)U(1) symmetry, presenting an apparent hurdle for defining the Berry phase and Berry curvature for these systems. We define a Berry connection for this system, with which the Berry phase and Berry curvature can be naturally computed. We use a three-level atom-molecule system to illustrate our results. In particular, we have computed the mean-field Berry curvature of this system analytically, and compared it to the Berry curvature computed with the second-quantized model of the same system. An excellent agreement is found, indicating the validity of our definition.
We discuss how symmetries and conservation laws are affected when Berry’s phase occurs in a quantum system: symmetry transformations of coordinates have to be supplemented by gauge transformations of Berry’s connection, and consequently constants of motion acquire terms beyond the familiar kinematical ones. We show how symmetries of a problem determine Berry’s connection, curvature and, once a specific path is chosen, the phase as well. Moreover, higher order corrections are also fixed. We demonstrate that in some instances Berry’s curvature and phase can be removed by a globally well-defined, time-dependent canonical transformation. Finally, we describe how field theoretic anomalies may be viewed as manifestations of Berry’s phase.
The Berry curvature and its descendant, the Berry phase, play an important role in quantum mechanics. They can be used to understand the Aharonov-Bohm effect, define topological Chern numbers, and generally to investigate the geometric properties of a quantum ground state manifold. While Berry curvature has been well studied in the regimes of few-body physics and noninteracting particles, its use in the regime of strong interactions is hindered by the lack of numerical methods to solve for it. In this paper I fill this gap by implementing a quantum Monte Carlo method to solve for the Berry curvature, based on interpreting Berry curvature as a leading correction to imaginary time ramps. I demonstrate my algorithm using the transverse-field Ising model in one and two dimensions, the latter of which is nonintegrable. Despite the fact that the Berry curvature gives information about the phase of the wave function, I show that the algorithm has no sign or phase problem for standard sign-problem-free Hamiltonians. My algorithm scales similarly to conventional methods as a function of system size and energy gap, and therefore should prove a valuable tool in investigating the quantum geometry of many-body systems.