Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

The stability of Berry's phases

Stefan Giller, Cezary Gonera, Piotr Kosiński, Paweł Maślanka

Published Dec 1, 1994• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(94)90031-0

Related papers

A constraint on Berry's phases and its applications

Yeong Deok Han, In Gyu Koh

Physics Letters A•May 1, 1993•4 citations

Compact and high-stability laser power stabilization system for atomic comagnetometer via polarization direction insensitive Pancharatnam-Berry phase grating

Yuzhuo Pei, Feng Liu, Zhihong Wu +7 more

Measurement•Jun 11, 2026•0 citations

A new approach to calculating the Berry phase

Lian-Ao Wu, Jing Sun, Ji-Yu Zhong

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1993•16 citations

Generalization of Berry’s geometric phase, equivalence of the Hamiltonian nature, quantizability and strong stability of linear oscillatory systems, and conservation of adiabatic invariants

Konstantin Yu Bliokh

A linear set of ordinary differential equations with a matrix depending on a set of adiabatically varying parameters is considered. Its asymptotic solutions are constructed to an arbitrary accuracy in the adiabaticity parameter ε. By extending the phase space of the system not only with the space of parameters, like in the theory of Berry’s phase, but also with the space of their derivatives, it proves possible to represent the phase of the solution as a sum of the dynamic phase and a generalized geometric phase (determined by a contour integral in the space of parameters and derivatives). Hence, it is possible to obtain the asymptotic results to any degree of accuracy in ε, while earlier they were obtainable only in the first-order adiabatic approximation. Namely, for linear oscillatory adiabatic systems, the quantizability, parametric stability, and the Hamiltonian nature of the system are equivalent properties. As a consequence, one can obtain the well-known result regarding conservation with accuracy to any power of ε of adiabatic invariants in a Hamiltonian system on a torus. An important point is that the generalized geometric phase can appear, in contrast to Berry’s phase, with only one real varying parameter.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 24, 2002•8 citations

Berry's Phase and Some of its Consequences

Brian K. Kendrick

•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Experimental Demonstration of the Stability of Berry’s Phase for a Spin- 1/2 Particle

Stefan Filipp, Jürgen Klepp, Yuji Hasegawa +4 more

The geometric phase has been proposed as a candidate for noise resilient coherent manipulation of fragile quantum systems. Since it is determined only by the path of the quantum state, the presence of noise fluctuations affects the geometric phase in a different way than the dynamical phase. We have experimentally tested the robustness of Berry's geometric phase for spin-1/2 particles in a cyclically varying magnetic field. Using trapped polarized ultracold neutrons, it is demonstrated that the geometric phase contributions to dephasing due to adiabatic field fluctuations vanish for long evolution times.

arXiv:0812.3757•Physical Review Letters•Jan 22, 2009•137 citations
A linear set of ordinary differential equations with a matrix depending on a set of adiabatically varying parameters is considered. Its asymptotic solutions are constructed to an arbitrary accuracy in the adiabaticity parameter ε. By extending the phase space of the system not only with the space of parameters, like in the theory of Berry’s phase, but also with the space of their derivatives, it proves possible to represent the phase of the solution as a sum of the dynamic phase and a generalized geometric phase (determined by a contour integral in the space of parameters and derivatives). Hence, it is possible to obtain the asymptotic results to any degree of accuracy in ε, while earlier they were obtainable only in the first-order adiabatic approximation. Namely, for linear oscillatory adiabatic systems, the quantizability, parametric stability, and the Hamiltonian nature of the system are equivalent properties. As a consequence, one can obtain the well-known result regarding conservation with accuracy to any power of ε of adiabatic invariants in a Hamiltonian system on a torus. An important point is that the generalized geometric phase can appear, in contrast to Berry’s phase, with only one real varying parameter.
The geometric phase has been proposed as a candidate for noise resilient coherent manipulation of fragile quantum systems. Since it is determined only by the path of the quantum state, the presence of noise fluctuations affects the geometric phase in a different way than the dynamical phase. We have experimentally tested the robustness of Berry's geometric phase for spin-1/2 particles in a cyclically varying magnetic field. Using trapped polarized ultracold neutrons, it is demonstrated that the geometric phase contributions to dephasing due to adiabatic field fluctuations vanish for long evolution times.