Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics

Information capacities for optical communications: Conventional versus quantum reception

Shapiro

Published Jan 1, 2012• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum issues in optical communication. [noise reduction in signal reception]

Robert S. Kennedy

•Jan 1, 1973•0 citations

Information in quantum optical communications

Apostol Vourdas

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•0 citations

Information Capacities for Optical Communications: Conventional versus Quantum Reception

Jeffrey H. Shapiro

The degree to which the ultimate, Holevo capacities for a variety of bosonic communication channels can exceed the Shannon capacities achievable with conventional heterodyne, homodyne, and direct detection is reviewed.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Jan 1, 2012•1 citation

Bandwidth Enhanced Rydberg Atomic Quantum Receivers for Wireless Communication and Sensing

Huizhi Wang, Tierui Gong, Emil Björnson +1 more

Rydberg atomic quantum receivers (RAQRs) have emerged as highly sensitive receivers for future communication and sensing systems. However, conventional RAQRs are primarily effective for single-carrier and narrowband reception, typically with an operational bandwidth of only a few hundred kilohertz. To enable the reception of multi-carrier signals with larger bandwidth, we propose a multi-carrier Rydberg atomic quantum receiver (MC-RAQR) architecture based on a five-level quantum system model. We analyze the amplitude and phase of the output laser in MC-RAQR and extract the baseband electrical signal for signal processing. Furthermore, we quantify the performance of MC-RAQR in multi-carrier communication and sensing by studying the channel capacity and distance estimation, respectively. Numerical results show that the MC-RAQR is capable of achieving a bandwidth of $7.2$ MHz, which is an order of magnitude larger than conventional RAQRs. Besides, compared to conventional receivers, MC-RAQR can improve the capacity and distance estimation by $18$-fold and $10^3$-fold, respectively. This validates the superiority of MC-RAQR in receiving multi-carrier signal, and demonstrates its compatibility in detecting waveforms such as orthogonal frequency‐division multiplexing.

International Conference on Communications•May 24, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Aspects of Optical Communications

C. Bendjaballah, Osamu Hirota, Serge Reynaud

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 1991•92 citations

Channel Capacity in Quantum-Noise-Limited Optical Communication Systems

Kazuro Kikuchi

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Oct 11, 2018•0 citations
Rydberg atomic quantum receivers (RAQRs) have emerged as highly sensitive receivers for future communication and sensing systems. However, conventional RAQRs are primarily effective for single-carrier and narrowband reception, typically with an operational bandwidth of only a few hundred kilohertz. To enable the reception of multi-carrier signals with larger bandwidth, we propose a multi-carrier Rydberg atomic quantum receiver (MC-RAQR) architecture based on a five-level quantum system model. We analyze the amplitude and phase of the output laser in MC-RAQR and extract the baseband electrical signal for signal processing. Furthermore, we quantify the performance of MC-RAQR in multi-carrier communication and sensing by studying the channel capacity and distance estimation, respectively. Numerical results show that the MC-RAQR is capable of achieving a bandwidth of 7.27.27.2 MHz, which is an order of magnitude larger than conventional RAQRs. Besides, compared to conventional receivers, MC-RAQR can improve the capacity and distance estimation by 181818-fold and 10310^3103-fold, respectively. This validates the superiority of MC-RAQR in receiving multi-carrier signal, and demonstrates its compatibility in detecting waveforms such as orthogonal frequency‐division multiplexing.