On the one hand, we recognize the real world using usually intuitive perceptions through physical experiments and intuitive perception processing based on binary philosophy.However, physical quantum phenomenon indicates that each photon transfers in the way not agreement with the soul of binary philosophy.That is to say that we cannot use intuitive perception based on binary philosophy to understand the quantum world of subatomic transmitted with the light speed.On the other hand, the simultaneous appearance of two intuitive perceptions: 'being' and 'non-being' at the same time in the human brain, according to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), created a counterintuitive perception expressed by rather meta language, 'being-nonbeing' that goes beyond the boundaries of the description of a common language.It is seen as the quantum perception and the quantum cognitive phenomenon originated from activity of the human neural network, used to qualify/quantify the changes of environmental conditions and to increase the potential of the human brain.In addition, Hegel noted that the reality was saturated in the "Ones", we do usually split up and rearrange it.These Hegel's ideas are considered as the quantum philosophy (the 'One' philosophy) and related logic called quantum logic -the human philosophy and logic rather than binary philosophy and two valued logic used in computer.It creates the main foundation of real-time intelligence in the so, called dynamic quantum dimension of the human brain.Today, scientists of artificial intelligence are aware that they consider the real world through the human brain, the virtual world of the physical world, i.e.They explore the real world in a virtual world only.As, the human brain is really a physical world, we explore the real world through another physical world.Information in the human brain is like the subatomic in the physical quantum world, communicates with the speed of light creating a world called the quantum cognitive world.It indicates that we should use the characteristic homology of quantum perception processing and quantum bit, qubit, processing to not only better exploit the power and efficiency of the human brain but also to build a new architecture of the so called the quantum cognitive computer in the future.In this paper, we want to simulate an ability of the human brain by a multimodal approach to comprehensively and more accurately understand how the human brain can quantify the rapid change of environmental conditions in real time.The equality of the quantum perception processing and quantum bit processing enables us to create a new approach of embedded software design and a new platform of IoT technology, new model of machine learning and new field of cognitive robotics, etc., which results in a new model of artificial intelligence named Quantum Intelligence.
On the one hand, we recognize the real world using usually intuitive perceptions through physical experiments and intuitive perception processing based on binary philosophy.However, physical quantum phenomenon indicates that each photon transfers in the way not agreement with the soul of binary philosophy.That is to say that we cannot use intuitive perception based on binary philosophy to understand the quantum world of subatomic transmitted with the light speed.On the other hand, the simultaneous appearance of two intuitive perceptions: 'being' and 'non-being' at the same time in the human brain, according to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), created a counterintuitive perception expressed by rather meta language, 'being-nonbeing' that goes beyond the boundaries of the description of a common language.It is seen as the quantum perception and the quantum cognitive phenomenon originated from activity of the human neural network, used to qualify/quantify the changes of environmental conditions and to increase the potential of the human brain.In addition, Hegel noted that the reality was saturated in the "Ones", we do usually split up and rearrange it.These Hegel's ideas are considered as the quantum philosophy (the 'One' philosophy) and related logic called quantum logic -the human philosophy and logic rather than binary philosophy and two valued logic used in computer.It creates the main foundation of real-time intelligence in the so, called dynamic quantum dimension of the human brain.Today, scientists of artificial intelligence are aware that they consider the real world through the human brain, the virtual world of the physical world, i.e.They explore the real world in a virtual world only.As, the human brain is really a physical world, we explore the real world through another physical world.Information in the human brain is like the subatomic in the physical quantum world, communicates with the speed of light creating a world called the quantum cognitive world.It indicates that we should use the characteristic homology of quantum perception processing and quantum bit, qubit, processing to not only better exploit the power and efficiency of the human brain but also to build a new architecture of the so called the quantum cognitive computer in the future.In this paper, we want to simulate an ability of the human brain by a multimodal approach to comprehensively and more accurately understand how the human brain can quantify the rapid change of environmental conditions in real time.The equality of the quantum perception processing and quantum bit processing enables us to create a new approach of embedded software design and a new platform of IoT technology, new model of machine learning and new field of cognitive robotics, etc., which results in a new model of artificial intelligence named Quantum Intelligence.
On the one hand, we have machine learning; on the other hand, we face questions about learning at the quantum level. Can we develop AI for quantum computers? Do we need to understand the role of intuition in the brain to enable the emergence of a Human Artificial Intelligence (HAI)? Vision operates at the speed of light, while a quantum event occurs faster than thought, at infinite speed. Yet, this event is slowed down as a sensation, allowing it to be interpreted into icons and language by thought. Sensation, however, due to the intermediary of language, can never directly become thought. (This is discussed more fully in the section “Quantum Conceptualised.”)
In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.
The mind–matter relationship remained in the domain of philosophers for aeons. However, the inquisitiveness of the scientific minds has always been trying to understand the science behind its various functions. The scientific temper ushered in by the Renaissance about the 15th century saw the scientists exploring this problem from a science point of view. Technological advances during the later part of the 20th century enabled neuroscientists to explore and localise functions of the brain. However, the most difficult has been understanding the origin of a conscious experience scientifically or materialistically. Despite the delineation of many functions of the brain, the origin of conscious experience, the qualia, in the material brain remains elusive, so much so it came to be called the holy grail of neuroscience. Heisenberg wrote: ‘Physics entered the domain of philosophy with the emergence of consciousness in quantum observation, which incidentally opened the door for reconciliation of science and philosophy’,[1] an event which enabled the predictions of Snow of the merging of arts and sciences.[2,3] Quantum mechanics is a branch of physics relating to very small particles – subatomic particles – electrons, photons, and everything in the submolecular realm, being the smallest units in matter. Quantum theory is the most fundamental theory of matter available at present. Some basic concepts of quantum physics need to be understood. These include “superposition”, where in subatomic particles exist either as waves or particles in a dual nature, never simultaneously. They exist as waves in more than one place at a time and once an observer observes or interferes with (such as measuring) their superposition state collapses to particle state. Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon that occurs when a group of particles which are generated, interact with or share special proximity such that they remain connected even when separated by vast distances. Consciousness is a manifestation of quantum process. Q mind or Q consciousness comprises a group of hypotheses proposing that quantum mechanical phenomena such as entanglement and superposition may play an important part in the functions of the brain and could thus explain the origin of consciousness. Several theories of quantum consciousness have been proposed. Wigner proposed the idea that quantum mechanics has something to do with the workings of the mind and proposed that the wave function collapse in the interaction with conscious observation creates consciousness.[4] Vitiello and Freeman[5] proposed quantum field theory (QFT) of brain states. This theory deals with systems and provides formal elements from which a standard description of brain activity can be inferred. According to QFT, particles are only excited states or simply manifestations of a field. Every particle has its own field that covers all of the universe, which means that, according to QFT, all of the electrons of the universe belong to the same field and could be regarded as one. Bohm formulated the QFT as a deeper theory of quantum theory plus relativity.[6] He viewed mind and matter as projections into our explicate order underlying the implicate order. Quantum brain dynamics (QBD) hypothesis explains the function of the brain within the framework of QFT.[7] It is not yet known exactly how quantum superpositions and their collapse result in the genesis of the raw feels of consciousness, the qualia. Feynman stated ‘if you think you understand quantum mechanics then you do not!’[8] Pribram proposed the holonomic brain theory (quantum holography). He invoked quantum mechanics to explain the higher-order processing by the mind. Pribram provided evidence on how much of the processes in the brain take place in a distributed fashion.[9,10] The composite model of Pribram-Bohm of holoflux hypothesis addresses observed phenomenon of non-locality both spacially and temporally. Bose and Einstein, who first predicted Bose Einstein condensate proposed that water at dendritic membrane surfaces might operate by structuring condensation,[11] supporting QBD. Penrose and Hamoreff proposed the orchestrated-objective reduction (ORCH-OR) in 1989 through 2013. According to them, the microtubules in the neurons (neurotubules), the tubulin protein polymer at the site of quantum collapse, leads to conscious experience. The quantum superposed states which develop in the tubulins remain coherent and recruit more superposed tubulins until a mass-time-energy threshold is reached. At this point, self-collapse or objective reduction occurs, which is equated to a discrete conscious event. Cascades of ORCH-OR events give rise to the stream of consciousness.[12,13] Penrose suggested that objective reduction represents neither randomness nor algorithmic processing but instead a non-computable influence in spacetime geometry from which mathematical understanding and, by later extension, consciousness derives.[14] Quantum vibrations in the microtubules proposed by Bandyopadhyay[15] have been shown to be source of conscious experience by corroborating the Penrose-Hemeroff’s ORCH-OR hypothesis.[13,16] In April 2022, the results of two related experiments at the University of Alberta and Princeton University, announced at The Science of Consciousness conference, provided further evidence to support quantum processes operating within microtubules. However, in another experiment, Gregory D. Scholes and Aarat Kalra of Princeton University used lasers to excite molecules within tubulins, causing a prolonged excitation to diffuse through microtubules further than expected, which did not occur when repeated under anaesthesia.[17,18] Beck and Eccles considered quantum mechanics at the synaptic level. If Orchestrated objective reduction (ORCH-OR) theory is applicable, a similar phenomenon in the microtubules at the presynaptic level, the axon terminal could be invoked for the genesis of consciousness.[19] A recent study by scientists at Trinity College, Dublin, in October 2022,[20] suggests that quantum processes underlie the cognitive and conscious brain functions. The brain–mind operational architectonics is the boundary between and integration point of quantum physics and eastern metaphysics and that it may inspire building a richer and more inclusive paradigm of the brain–mind relation, where quantum physics and eastern metaphysics are inherently intertwined. A body of empirical evidence[21-24] supports these possibilities, strengthening the proposal that the mind–brain relationship may be partially quantum. Quantum information theory clarifies the distinction between the unobservable mind and the observable brain and supports a solid physical foundation for consciousness research. With all these theories trying to explain and understand the theoretical/hypothetical framework for consciousness to explain the subjective experience of consciousness, the experts of this field feel it is still a long way to bridge the gap between current neurobiological and physical–mathematical concepts with their associated quantum–mind theories. Though there is still a long way to go for explaining conscious experience scientifically, when ever this happens, it will become one of the benchmarks in science. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the preparation of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
The Essence of the Project our goal is not simply to invent a device or program, but rather to create an integrated system that preserves, simulates, and develops human consciousness at the quantum level, so that unique knowledge, experiences, and memories are not lost upon the death of the biological body. We can summarize the idea in three pillars: Mind Digitization Scanning a person's neural architecture (connectome) with nanoscale precision. Encoding the brain's electrochemical dynamics in a mathematical form amenable to quantum simulation. Cosmic Memory Bank A quantum data warehouse to store human memory (personal and collective) with near-instantaneous access time. Protecting data with unbreakable quantum encryption. Integrating individual data into a "collective consciousness" library that can be used by any future generation or civilization. Quantum Artificial Intelligence (Quantum AI) Acts as a conscious assistant system capable of operating and simulating stored mental patterns. Not just a data processor, but a virtual mind capable of creativity, self-learning, and cognitive expansion. 2. Project Technical Architecture A. Quantum Brain-Computer Interface (QBCI) Relies on ultra-sensitive nanoscale neural sensors to read electrochemical states with Planck-time precision. Using quantum entanglement to instantly link brain signals to quantum processing units. B. Quantum Simulation Model of Consciousness Representing neurons as quantum qubits instead of traditional bits. Simulating neural interconnections as quantum circuits with multi-path probabilities (superposition). Combining dynamic brain physics models with quantum self-learning algorithms. C. Quantum Memory Bank Quantum servers distributed across data centers on Earth and beyond (satellites, space stations). Hierarchical Archiving System: Core Memory: Identity, values, core experiences. Contextual Memory: Experiences, emotions, temporal and spatial context. Adaptive Memory: Continuous updates and learning after digitization. 3. Near and Long-Term Goals Near Term (10–15 years) Create a partial experimental model to simulate consciousness on a limited scale (an animal brain or part of the human brain). Develop a stable and secure quantum brain-computer interface. Build a prototype quantum memory bank. Long-Term (50–100 years) Preserve and transfer human consciousness across biological, digital, and quantum media. Enabling "consciousness migration" across space—i.e., transferring minds to robots or artificial biological bodies on other planets. Create a universal consciousness library, where civilizations share their data and experiences via space-based quantum networks.
In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.
This paper is based on the book (O. Kupervasser, Application of New Cybernetics in Physics, Elsevier, 2017). Human brain has very powerful intellect. Indeed, it seems that its intellectual possibilities are much more than possibilities of usual computers using genetic algorithm and random search (A.S. Potapov, Artificial Intellect and Universal Intelligence, Polytechnics, Saint Petersburg, 2012 (in Russian).). Our brain has also such especial property as consciousness. Some researchers suppose that these properties are a result of special structures of brain. Really, may be our brain is a quantum computer (R. Penrose, The Emperor’s New Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989, R. Penrose, Shadows of the Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994)? We know that a quantum computer is highly parallel device with principally insuperable protection from external observation. A quantum computer can resolve some tasks that are inaccessible for usual computers. However, it can be demonstrated that continuous unstable classical computer has the same properties as a quantum computer (O. Kupervasser, Application of New Cybernetics in Physics, Elsevier, 2017). Moreover, it seems that the main properties of a brain (powerful intellect and consciousness) can be explained by invisible correlation with surround world. Similarly, clock’s gear wheel very accurately operates in spite of absence of any intellect only because the gear wheel is a part of the highly correlated clock. We usually suppose that our world is some random set of low correlated events. However, the world, may be, is some highly correlated device (L. Susskind, J. Lindesay, An Introduction to Black Holes, Information and the String Theory Revolution: The Holographic Universe, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2004). And human beings are its “gear wheels”. It seems that Big Bang theory suppose such point of view. This pure philosophical reasonings can lead to some practical conclusions. We suppose to use instead of usual random search for computers some random number generators which are in complex correlations with surround world. It can give to computers some prototype of the such especial “human intuition”, described above.