Quantum Computational Supremacy via High-Dimensional Gaussian Boson Sampling
Abhinav Deshpande, Arthur Mehta, Trevor J. Vincent, Nicolás Quesada, Marcel Hinsche, Marios Ioannou, Lars S. Madsen, Jonathan Lavoie, Haoyu Qi, Jens Eisert, Dominik Hangleiter, Bill Fefferman, Ish Dhand
Photonics is a promising platform for demonstrating quantum computational supremacy (QCS) by convincingly outperforming the most powerful classical supercomputers on a well-defined computational task. Despite this promise, existing photonics proposals and demonstrations face significant hurdles. Experimentally, current implementations of Gaussian boson sampling lack programmability or have prohibitive loss rates. Theoretically, there is a comparative lack of rigorous evidence for the classical hardness of GBS. In this work, we make significant progress in improving both the theoretical evidence and experimental prospects. On the theory side, we provide strong evidence for the hardness of Gaussian boson sampling, placing it on par with the strongest theoretical proposals for QCS. On the experimental side, we propose a new QCS architecture, high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling, which is programmable and can be implemented with low loss rates using few optical components. We show that particular classical algorithms for simulating GBS are vastly outperformed by high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling experiments at modest system sizes. This work thus opens the path to demonstrating QCS with programmable photonic processors.
Photonics is a promising platform for demonstrating quantum computational supremacy (QCS) by convincingly outperforming the most powerful classical supercomputers on a well-defined computational task. Despite this promise, existing photonics proposals and demonstrations face significant hurdles. Experimentally, current implementations of Gaussian boson sampling lack programmability or have prohibitive loss rates. Theoretically, there is a comparative lack of rigorous evidence for the classical hardness of GBS. In this work, we make significant progress in improving both the theoretical evidence and experimental prospects. On the theory side, we provide strong evidence for the hardness of Gaussian boson sampling, placing it on par with the strongest theoretical proposals for QCS. On the experimental side, we propose a new QCS architecture, high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling, which is programmable and can be implemented with low loss rates using few optical components. We show that particular classical algorithms for simulating GBS are vastly outperformed by high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling experiments at modest system sizes. This work thus opens the path to demonstrating QCS with programmable photonic processors.
Photonics is a promising platform for demonstrating a quantum computational advantage (QCA) by outperforming the most powerful classical supercomputers on a well-defined computational task. Despite this promise, existing proposals and demonstrations face challenges. Experimentally, current implementations of Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) lack programmability or have prohibitive loss rates. Theoretically, there is a comparative lack of rigorous evidence for the classical hardness of GBS. In this work, we make progress in improving both the theoretical evidence and experimental prospects. We provide evidence for the hardness of GBS, comparable to the strongest theoretical proposals for QCA. We also propose a QCA architecture we call high-dimensional GBS, which is programmable and can be implemented with low loss using few optical components. We show that particular algorithms for simulating GBS are outperformed by high-dimensional GBS experiments at modest system sizes. This work thus opens the path to demonstrating QCA with programmable photonic processors.
The creation of large-scale, high-fidelity quantum computers is not only a fundamental scientific endeavour in itself, but also provides increasingly robust proofs of quantum computational advantage (QCA) in the presence of unavoidable noise and the dynamic competition with classical algorithm improvements. To overcome the biggest challenge of photon-based QCA experiments, photon loss, we report new Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) experiments with 1024 high-efficiency squeezed states injected into a hybrid spatial-temporal encoded, 8176-mode, programmable photonic quantum processor, Jiuzhang 4.0, which produces up to 3050 photon detection events. Our experimental results outperform all classical spoofing algorithms, particularly the matrix product state (MPS) method, which was recently proposed to utilise photon loss to reduce the classical simulation complexity of GBS. Using the state-of-the-art MPS algorithm on the most powerful supercomputer EI Capitan, it would take > 1042 years to construct the required tensor network for simulation, while our Jiuzhang 4.0 quantum computer takes 25.6 μs to produce a sample. This work establishes a new frontier of QCA and paves the way to fault-tolerant photonic quantum computing hardware.
Abstract A quantum computer attains computational advantage when outperforming the best classical computers running the best-known algorithms on well-defined tasks. No photonic machine offering programmability over all its quantum gates has demonstrated quantum computational advantage: previous machines 1,2 were largely restricted to static gate sequences. Earlier photonic demonstrations were also vulnerable to spoofing 3 , in which classical heuristics produce samples, without direct simulation, lying closer to the ideal distribution than do samples from the quantum hardware. Here we report quantum computational advantage using Borealis, a photonic processor offering dynamic programmability on all gates implemented. We carry out Gaussian boson sampling 4 (GBS) on 216 squeezed modes entangled with three-dimensional connectivity 5 , using a time-multiplexed and photon-number-resolving architecture. On average, it would take more than 9,000 years for the best available algorithms and supercomputers to produce, using exact methods, a single sample from the programmed distribution, whereas Borealis requires only 36 μs. This runtime advantage is over 50 million times as extreme as that reported from earlier photonic machines. Ours constitutes a very large GBS experiment, registering events with up to 219 photons and a mean photon number of 125. This work is a critical milestone on the path to a practical quantum computer, validating key technological features of photonics as a platform for this goal.
Quantum computers solve intractable problems which classically require an exponentially long time to compute. With the development of large-scale experiments that claim quantum advantage, a vital issue has now emerged. What are the errors, and how do they affect the complexity of the problem solved? Large-scale Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) experiments give an example in which random numbers are generated. Despite classical hardness, these have computable benchmarks for checking data validity. While there are other quantum computing architectures, Gaussian boson sampling is uniquely testable at all scales. Several large, pioneering quantum computing (QC) experiments have been carried out to investigate quantum advantage. Here, we introduce a highly scalable but classical algorithm that can solve GBS approximately. Our numerical simulation of the output count data is closer to the exact solution than current experiments up to 1152 modes. This algorithm outperforms all previous classical, approximate algorithms and scales efficiently to larger experiments. Our results show that effects beyond losses can cause the errors that allow classical simulability. This work will lead to more precise algorithms and is a step towards understanding how QC quantum advantage is affected by the underlying physics.
As a promising candidate for exhibiting quantum computational supremacy, Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is designed to exploit the ease of experimental preparation of Gaussian states. However, sufficiently large and inevitable experimental noise might render GBS classically simulable. In this work, we formalize this intuition by establishing a sufficient condition for approximate polynomial-time classical simulation of noisy GBS-in the form of an inequality between the input squeezing parameter, the overall transmission rate, and the quality of photon detectors. Our result serves as a nonclassicality test that must be passed by any quantum computational supremacy demonstration based on GBS. We show that, for most linear-optical architectures, where photon loss increases exponentially with the circuit depth, noisy GBS loses its quantum advantage in the asymptotic limit. Our results thus delineate intermediate-sized regimes where GBS devices might considerably outperform classical computers for modest noise levels. Finally, we find that increasing the amount of input squeezing is helpful to evade our classical simulation algorithm, which suggests a potential route to mitigate photon loss.
The strong efforts towards the realization of scalable quantum computing are motivated by the promise of super-polynomial speed-up in several computational tasks. A first fundamental step in this route is to provide concrete evidence of ‘quantum supremacy'. Such a regime is obtained when a quantum device is capable of solving a specific problem faster than the best classical hardware. A serious attempt to provide a first demonstration of quantum speed-up with affordable resources is represented by boson sampling [1,2], a non-universal quantum-computational protocol exploiting indistinguishable single photons and linear optical devices. In this context, strong theoretical evidence has been reported that the interference pattern generated by a boson sampler is hard to simulate with classical resources, this pattern being related to the calculation of a hard-to-compute quantity known as a matrix permanent. Formal achievement of the regime of quantum supremacy will answer two very relevant questions: Are we able to benefit from the power of quantum mechanics or does there exist a fundamental reason why this achievement is forbidden? Once this regime has been achieved, are we able to certify the correct functioning of the quantum boson samplers or do we face an undecidability problem? Starting from these intriguing and promising theoretical results, an experimental race kicked off with the aim of reaching the quantum supremacy regime with boson sampling by employing a photonic platform [3]. A large amount of effort has been devoted to pushing the limits of current photonic systems [1], in order to significantly increase the size (number of photons and optical modes) that can be handled with a quantum device. In parallel to this quest for improved quantum performance, it is fundamental to benchmark the limits of a classical simulation of boson sampling. More specifically, in the race for quantum supremacy, what is the best possible classical simulation that can be performed? Such an analysis would be necessary to define the computational capacity possessed by such a classical agent to perform the task (see Fig. 1). In the race for quantum supremacy, a user who employs the best classical hardware and software, and a second agent who exploits a quantum device compete to solve the boson sampling task faster. In a recent article, Wu et al. [4] have provided a fundamental step to define and push the limits of a classical simulation of boson sampling. The authors have employed Tianhe-2, one of the world's most powerful super-computers, to perform such a task. More specifically, by using such high-performance computing hardware and by employing the fastest algorithm to date, Wu et al. have shown that calculating the permanent of a |50×50| matrix can be performed in 100 min. Recent results [5] have shown that this computation corresponds to the classical hardness of drawing a 50-photon sample from a boson sampling distribution. The strong computational capacity of Tianhe-2 also allowed us to address the precision that the known fastest classical algorithms can reach in such a large-scale calculation. This latter aspect is indeed of fundamental importance, since any reliable classical computation must be accompanied by an appropriate error analysis. The study reported in Ref. [4] represents by far the largest calculation to date related to the classical simulation of boson sampling, whose relevance can be found in two different but related aspects. First, it raises the bar for any quantum implementation aimed at reaching quantum advantage, and provides a fundamental benchmark to which any photonic hardware must compare. This result suggests that a larger effort must be dedicated to pushing quantum technologies in this direction. Second, improved classical simulation also has important consequences in the context of boson sampling certification, i.e. the verification that a quantum device is correctly performing the required task. Indeed, first validation procedures in the quantum advantage regime must be assisted by powerful classical computational resources that, while requiring longer processing time than quantum hardware, will necessarily have to perform complex calculations.