Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Matrix Element of a Physical Operator via Functional Integral

Lukong Cornelius Fai

Published Feb 19, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We limit ourselves for convenience to a system with one degree of freedom and having the Lagrangian of a particle in a potential field, as in 5.107 . For the transition amplitude of this system we have expression 5.97 . We have the following questions to ask: Is it possible on the basis of functional integration to obtain the formula for the evaluation of the matrix element of a physical operator of the type 4.82 ? How can we avoid the difficulty related to the normalization factor in the evaluation of these matrix elements? In order to answer these questions, we define the matrix element of a physical operator using the quantum mechanical definition. We limit ourselves to the quantum mechanical evaluation of the matrix element of the operator of a physical quantity F. We consider the Heisenberg localized state | q i , t i ⟩. Suppose the initial time moment t i corresponds to the initial state | q i , t i ⟩ and the final time moment t f corresponds to the final state | q f , t f ⟩. Consider the Heisenberg operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_1.jpg"/> of a physical quantity Ϝ and t i ≤ t ≤ t f . By definition, considering the normalized state, the matrix element in the q representation of the operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_2.jpg"/> at the given time moment t is given by the relation: 10.1 F if = q f , t f | F ̂ t | q i , t i q f , t f q i , t i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn10_1.jpg"/>

DOI
10.1201/9781003145554-10

Related papers

Functional Derivative

Lukong Cornelius Fai

As in path integration one deals with classical functions and functionals rather than with operators then fairly simple classical manipulations of path integration can lead to non-trivial quantum mechanical identities. We consider a simple example of the functional derivative that relates some functional, say, Ϝ[ q ] where the function q ( t ) changes by y ( t ) and the transition amplitude Κ remains invariant: 13.1 δ F = F q + y − F q = ∫ δ F s δ q s y s d s ≡ ∫ Α q s y s d s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn13_1.jpg"/> and 13.2 d F = Α d q https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn13_2.jpg"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 19, 2021•0 citations

Eigenstates and the Third Postulate

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The representation of physical observables by Hermitian linear operators was postulated assuming that an expectation value, defined by Eqs.(2.11) and (2.12) , is associated with any observable A measured in a quantum state Ψ of a dynamical system. In view of measurement uncertainties, defined by the dispersion: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈 A 2 〉 − 〈 A 〉 2 = 〈 ( A − 〈 A 〉 ) 2 〉 = 〈 ( δ A ) 2 〉 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_1_B.tif"/> the expectation value 〈 A 〉 is taken in a state Ψ if and only if (Δ Α ) 2 vanishes. It is convenient to introduce the deviation operator: 3.1 δ  =  − 〈 A 〉 Î https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_2_B.tif"/> such that the condition of a vanishing dispersion for the observable A in a given state Ψ reads: 〈 Ψ |( δ  ) 2 Ψ 〉 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_3_B.tif"/> Because δ is a Hermitian operator, we can also write: 〈 δ Â Ψ | δ Â Ψ 〉 = | δ Â Ψ | 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_4_B.tif"/> which means that the norm of δ Â Ψ is zero and this implies that we have a null function δ Â Ψ = 0. In other words: 3.2 Â Ψ = 〈 A 〉 Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_5_B.tif"/> It follows that the state function Ψ where a definite expectation value 〈 A 〉 of the observable A is observed, should be a solution of Eq.(3.2) rather than an arbitrary 112 function. The action of the operator  on Ψ has to be simply that of rescaling. All the state functions which are solutions of Eq.(3.2) are called eigenfunctions of  , and the constant factor 〈 A 〉 is said to be the corresponding eigenvalue. Hence we have shown that if ((δ  ) 2 ) = 0, the state function should be an eigenfunction of  , which means that a physical observable only takes definite values in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated quantum operator. Conversely, given a quantum operator  one can systematically determine all its eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, which are solutions of the so-called eigenvalue equation: 3.3 Â Ψ = λ Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_6_B.tif"/> It is visible that the eigenvalue equation fixes the eigenfunctions only up to an overall scale factor, which may always be chosen such that the eigenfunctions be considered normalized. Then, in view of Eq.(2.11) , Eq.(3.3) gives: 〈  〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Â Ψ d x = λ ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_7_B.tif"/> If we further apply the operator  to Eq.(3.3) , we obtain  2 Ψ = λ 2 Ψ and this leads to: 〈  2 〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ *  2 Ψ d x = λ 2 ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_8_B.tif"/> It follows that: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈  2 〉 − 〈  〉 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_9_B.tif"/> and this shows that the dispersion vanishes if a physical observable is measured in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated operator.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations

Quasi-Classical Approximation in Quantum Statistical Mechanics

Lukong Cornelius Fai

We begin by first showing how, with the Feynman functional integration in the representation of the matrix density, we can make a transition to classical distribution. The Feynman density matrix as seen earlier has the form in 16.77: 16.1 ρ q q ′ = ∫ q ′ q exp S ¯ q , q ′ , − i ℏ β D q τ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn16_1.jpg"/> where 16.2 S ¯ = S ¯ q τ , − i ℏ β ≡ ∫ 0 β − m 2 ℏ 2 q . 2 − U q d τ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn16_2.jpg"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 19, 2021•0 citations

Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

Z. Ficek

In an orthonormal basis, a linear operator  is represented by the matrix ( 18.1 ) A ˆ = ( 2 λ 1+ λ 1+ λ λ ) , https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429092053/5e12ab0e-ba42-4caa-9bdf-6325e9117d3e/content/eqn18_1.tif"/>

•Apr 27, 2016•0 citations

The evaluation of matrix elements in functional integral form

J. L. Martin

Abstract The source-function technique of Schwinger is used to express any transformation matrix element in a form involving a functional derivative operator. An elementary algebra of such expressions is developed, and in the case of quantum mechanics is found to lead to a natural evaluation procedure; the result expresses the matrix element as an indefinitely repeated integral, with the integrations arranged in order of importance. Discrete as well as continuous eigenvalues can be dealt with by this method. In so far as the procedure is a kind of ‘sum-over-histories’, the result is related to the Feynman principle. The field-theoretic situation requires further developments in technique.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Dec 9, 1958•1 citation

Transition Amplitude

Lukong Cornelius Fai

We examine under this heading the transition amplitude in the Feynman path integral, which we will discuss shortly and will be reduced to an integral over the continuum degrees of freedom, such as a set of p i i = 1 s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_1.jpg"/> and q i i = 1 s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_2.jpg"/> . This will involve harmonic (non-interacting) systems that are reduced to the problem of multiple Gaussian integrals over potentially coupled degrees of freedom, q i i = 1 s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_3.jpg"/> that we develop appropriate Feynman path integral tools for their solution. Considering that the harmonic oscillator is one of the central objects of theoretical physics then Gaussian integrals are likely to be the key tools of theoretical physics. This will be demonstrated utilizing Feynman path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics where Gaussian integrals will be pivotal for computation in quantum mechanics, quantum statistical mechanics and generally in quantum field theory. It will be interesting to introduce the Maslov correction [ 11 , 12 ] to the wave function which is a jump of π 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_4.jpg"/> in the phase when a system passes through a caustic point, a phenomenon related to the second variation as well as to the geometry of paths. This phenomenon is applicable to any system using the quasi-classical approximation. The harmonic oscillator will be one of the objects amongst others to illustrate this.

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 19, 2021•0 citations
We limit ourselves for convenience to a system with one degree of freedom and having the Lagrangian of a particle in a potential field, as in 5.107 . For the transition amplitude of this system we have expression 5.97 . We have the following questions to ask: Is it possible on the basis of functional integration to obtain the formula for the evaluation of the matrix element of a physical operator of the type 4.82 ? How can we avoid the difficulty related to the normalization factor in the evaluation of these matrix elements? In order to answer these questions, we define the matrix element of a physical operator using the quantum mechanical definition. We limit ourselves to the quantum mechanical evaluation of the matrix element of the operator of a physical quantity F. We consider the Heisenberg localized state | q i , t i ⟩. Suppose the initial time moment t i corresponds to the initial state | q i , t i ⟩ and the final time moment t f corresponds to the final state | q f , t f ⟩. Consider the Heisenberg operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_1.jpg"/> of a physical quantity Ϝ and t i ≤ t ≤ t f . By definition, considering the normalized state, the matrix element in the q representation of the operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_2.jpg"/> at the given time moment t is given by the relation: 10.1 F if = q f , t f | F ̂ t | q i , t i q f , t f q i , t i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn10_1.jpg"/>
As in path integration one deals with classical functions and functionals rather than with operators then fairly simple classical manipulations of path integration can lead to non-trivial quantum mechanical identities. We consider a simple example of the functional derivative that relates some functional, say, Ϝ[ q ] where the function q ( t ) changes by y ( t ) and the transition amplitude Κ remains invariant: 13.1 δ F = F q + y − F q = ∫ δ F s δ q s y s d s ≡ ∫ Α q s y s d s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn13_1.jpg"/> and 13.2 d F = Α d q https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn13_2.jpg"/>
The representation of physical observables by Hermitian linear operators was postulated assuming that an expectation value, defined by Eqs.(2.11) and (2.12) , is associated with any observable A measured in a quantum state Ψ of a dynamical system. In view of measurement uncertainties, defined by the dispersion: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈 A 2 〉 − 〈 A 〉 2 = 〈 ( A − 〈 A 〉 ) 2 〉 = 〈 ( δ A ) 2 〉 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_1_B.tif"/> the expectation value 〈 A 〉 is taken in a state Ψ if and only if (Δ Α ) 2 vanishes. It is convenient to introduce the deviation operator: 3.1 δ  =  − 〈 A 〉 Î https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_2_B.tif"/> such that the condition of a vanishing dispersion for the observable A in a given state Ψ reads: 〈 Ψ |( δ  ) 2 Ψ 〉 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_3_B.tif"/> Because δ is a Hermitian operator, we can also write: 〈 δ Â Ψ | δ Â Ψ 〉 = | δ Â Ψ | 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_4_B.tif"/> which means that the norm of δ Â Ψ is zero and this implies that we have a null function δ Â Ψ = 0. In other words: 3.2 Â Ψ = 〈 A 〉 Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_5_B.tif"/> It follows that the state function Ψ where a definite expectation value 〈 A 〉 of the observable A is observed, should be a solution of Eq.(3.2) rather than an arbitrary 112 function. The action of the operator  on Ψ has to be simply that of rescaling. All the state functions which are solutions of Eq.(3.2) are called eigenfunctions of  , and the constant factor 〈 A 〉 is said to be the corresponding eigenvalue. Hence we have shown that if ((δ  ) 2 ) = 0, the state function should be an eigenfunction of  , which means that a physical observable only takes definite values in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated quantum operator. Conversely, given a quantum operator  one can systematically determine all its eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, which are solutions of the so-called eigenvalue equation: 3.3 Â Ψ = λ Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_6_B.tif"/> It is visible that the eigenvalue equation fixes the eigenfunctions only up to an overall scale factor, which may always be chosen such that the eigenfunctions be considered normalized. Then, in view of Eq.(2.11) , Eq.(3.3) gives: 〈  〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Â Ψ d x = λ ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_7_B.tif"/> If we further apply the operator  to Eq.(3.3) , we obtain  2 Ψ = λ 2 Ψ and this leads to: 〈  2 〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ *  2 Ψ d x = λ 2 ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_8_B.tif"/> It follows that: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈  2 〉 − 〈  〉 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_9_B.tif"/> and this shows that the dispersion vanishes if a physical observable is measured in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated operator.
We begin by first showing how, with the Feynman functional integration in the representation of the matrix density, we can make a transition to classical distribution. The Feynman density matrix as seen earlier has the form in 16.77: 16.1 ρ q q ′ = ∫ q ′ q exp S ¯ q , q ′ , − i ℏ β D q τ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn16_1.jpg"/> where 16.2 S ¯ = S ¯ q τ , − i ℏ β ≡ ∫ 0 β − m 2 ℏ 2 q . 2 − U q d τ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn16_2.jpg"/>
Abstract The source-function technique of Schwinger is used to express any transformation matrix element in a form involving a functional derivative operator. An elementary algebra of such expressions is developed, and in the case of quantum mechanics is found to lead to a natural evaluation procedure; the result expresses the matrix element as an indefinitely repeated integral, with the integrations arranged in order of importance. Discrete as well as continuous eigenvalues can be dealt with by this method. In so far as the procedure is a kind of ‘sum-over-histories’, the result is related to the Feynman principle. The field-theoretic situation requires further developments in technique.
We examine under this heading the transition amplitude in the Feynman path integral, which we will discuss shortly and will be reduced to an integral over the continuum degrees of freedom, such as a set of p i i = 1 s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_1.jpg"/> and q i i = 1 s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_2.jpg"/> . This will involve harmonic (non-interacting) systems that are reduced to the problem of multiple Gaussian integrals over potentially coupled degrees of freedom, q i i = 1 s https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_3.jpg"/> that we develop appropriate Feynman path integral tools for their solution. Considering that the harmonic oscillator is one of the central objects of theoretical physics then Gaussian integrals are likely to be the key tools of theoretical physics. This will be demonstrated utilizing Feynman path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics where Gaussian integrals will be pivotal for computation in quantum mechanics, quantum statistical mechanics and generally in quantum field theory. It will be interesting to introduce the Maslov correction [ 11 , 12 ] to the wave function which is a jump of π 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline4_4.jpg"/> in the phase when a system passes through a caustic point, a phenomenon related to the second variation as well as to the geometry of paths. This phenomenon is applicable to any system using the quasi-classical approximation. The harmonic oscillator will be one of the objects amongst others to illustrate this.