Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics B Atomic and Molecular Physics

Matrix elements and correspondence principles

P F Naccache

Published Jul 1, 1972• 86 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Heisenberg's form of the correspondence principle for non-relativistic matrix elements has been used to evaluate matrix elements for various potentials. These are compared with available quantum mechanical results to check the general validity of the use of classical mechanics and correspondence principles in the derivation of quantum mechanical expressions. Using a one dimensional harmonic oscillator potential matrix elements of the form (n mod qm mod n+s) and (n mod pm mod n+s) are worked out. A Morse potential is then considered and the matrix elements for position, momentum, and kinetic energy are evaluated. Using a Coulomb potential a similar procedure is used for functions of various position coordinates, from which dipole and quadrupole moments from transitions between n, l states are calculated. The agreement with quantum mechanics is found to be generally good, and in some cases identical results are obtained.

DOI
10.1088/0022-3700/5/7/008

Related papers

Semiclassical mechanics in one dimension: II. Approximate matrix elements

Peter Kasperkovitz, Momtchil Peev

The semiclassical formula for matrix elements, sometimes called the Heisenberg correspondence principle, relates matrix elements (operators in energy representation) to phase space functions (Weyl representatives). The formula does not make sense for arbitrary operators; when it is valid it implicitly fixes the relative phases of the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian. The conventions, which have to be used for the wavefunctions in position or momentum representation, are given here in explicit form, and we present a class of operators related to coherent states of high energy for which the Heisenberg correspondence principle holds.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 6, 1998•2 citations

A correspondence principle for strongly coupled states

Ian Colin Percival, D Richards

Heisenberg's correspondence principle for non-relativistic matrix elements has been generalized: quantal transition amplitudes between strongly coupled states are expressed as Fourier components of integrals over classical trajectories. The new theory reduces to Heisenberg's correspondence principle in particular cases. The theory is applicable whenever the change in quantum number is small compared with the initial quantum number. In these situations it is more comprehensive than both quantal first order perturbation theory and the sudden approximation. Furthermore, compared with standard quantal methods, the evaluation of amplitudes is particularly simple. The theory is worked out for one- and three-dimensional separable systems and the generalization to a system of arbitrary dimension is indicated.

Journal of Physics B Atomic and Molecular Physics•Aug 1, 1970•92 citations

Matrix elements and classical limit of relativistic particles in infinitely deep potential well

Mai-Lin Liang, Fulin Zhang, Yuan Bing +1 more

For relativistic particles with spin-0 (satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation) and spin-1/2 (satisfying the Dirac equation) in infinitely deep potential well, matrix elements for the coordinate, momentum and the velocity operators are calculated. In the limit of large quantum numbers, these matrix elements give the corresponding classical quantities (nowbeing related quantities in special relativity) and satisfy exact classical relations. These results show that the Heisenberg correspondence principle is applicable to such relativistic systems.

Acta Physica Sinica•Jan 1, 2007•1 citation

Angular momentum and Heisenberg's correspondence principle. II. More complex matrix elements

S C McFarlane

For pt.I see ibid., vol.25, no.20, p.4045-57 (1992). Previous work on the correspondence principle limit of matrix elements of tensor operators is extended to more complex matrix elements. Limiting forms of several such matrix elements are obtained; each case yields an approximate form for an angular momentum coupling coefficient: two for the 6-j symbol and one for the 9-j symbol. These are similar to existing approximations but are more symmetrical in form and, as a result, more accurate.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Jul 14, 1993•3 citations

Matrix Element of a Physical Operator via Functional Integral

Lukong Cornelius Fai

We limit ourselves for convenience to a system with one degree of freedom and having the Lagrangian of a particle in a potential field, as in 5.107 . For the transition amplitude of this system we have expression 5.97 . We have the following questions to ask: Is it possible on the basis of functional integration to obtain the formula for the evaluation of the matrix element of a physical operator of the type 4.82 ? How can we avoid the difficulty related to the normalization factor in the evaluation of these matrix elements? In order to answer these questions, we define the matrix element of a physical operator using the quantum mechanical definition. We limit ourselves to the quantum mechanical evaluation of the matrix element of the operator of a physical quantity F. We consider the Heisenberg localized state | q i , t i ⟩. Suppose the initial time moment t i corresponds to the initial state | q i , t i ⟩ and the final time moment t f corresponds to the final state | q f , t f ⟩. Consider the Heisenberg operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_1.jpg"/> of a physical quantity Ϝ and t i ≤ t ≤ t f . By definition, considering the normalized state, the matrix element in the q representation of the operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_2.jpg"/> at the given time moment t is given by the relation: 10.1 F if = q f , t f | F ̂ t | q i , t i q f , t f q i , t i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn10_1.jpg"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 19, 2021•0 citations

Matrix elements and classical limits of nonlinear oscillator

LI Feng-min

For a nonlinear harmonic oscillator with potential V(x)=1/2mω2x2+λx4,the classical equation of motion can not be solved by the perturbation method.The classical solution of the nonlinear oscillator is derived from quantum matrix elements by using the Heisenberg correspondence principle,which helps us to understand the properties of the nonlinear oscillator more profoundly.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations
Heisenberg's form of the correspondence principle for non-relativistic matrix elements has been used to evaluate matrix elements for various potentials. These are compared with available quantum mechanical results to check the general validity of the use of classical mechanics and correspondence principles in the derivation of quantum mechanical expressions. Using a one dimensional harmonic oscillator potential matrix elements of the form (n mod qm mod n+s) and (n mod pm mod n+s) are worked out. A Morse potential is then considered and the matrix elements for position, momentum, and kinetic energy are evaluated. Using a Coulomb potential a similar procedure is used for functions of various position coordinates, from which dipole and quadrupole moments from transitions between n, l states are calculated. The agreement with quantum mechanics is found to be generally good, and in some cases identical results are obtained.
The semiclassical formula for matrix elements, sometimes called the Heisenberg correspondence principle, relates matrix elements (operators in energy representation) to phase space functions (Weyl representatives). The formula does not make sense for arbitrary operators; when it is valid it implicitly fixes the relative phases of the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian. The conventions, which have to be used for the wavefunctions in position or momentum representation, are given here in explicit form, and we present a class of operators related to coherent states of high energy for which the Heisenberg correspondence principle holds.
Heisenberg's correspondence principle for non-relativistic matrix elements has been generalized: quantal transition amplitudes between strongly coupled states are expressed as Fourier components of integrals over classical trajectories. The new theory reduces to Heisenberg's correspondence principle in particular cases. The theory is applicable whenever the change in quantum number is small compared with the initial quantum number. In these situations it is more comprehensive than both quantal first order perturbation theory and the sudden approximation. Furthermore, compared with standard quantal methods, the evaluation of amplitudes is particularly simple. The theory is worked out for one- and three-dimensional separable systems and the generalization to a system of arbitrary dimension is indicated.
For relativistic particles with spin-0 (satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation) and spin-1/2 (satisfying the Dirac equation) in infinitely deep potential well, matrix elements for the coordinate, momentum and the velocity operators are calculated. In the limit of large quantum numbers, these matrix elements give the corresponding classical quantities (nowbeing related quantities in special relativity) and satisfy exact classical relations. These results show that the Heisenberg correspondence principle is applicable to such relativistic systems.
We limit ourselves for convenience to a system with one degree of freedom and having the Lagrangian of a particle in a potential field, as in 5.107 . For the transition amplitude of this system we have expression 5.97 . We have the following questions to ask: Is it possible on the basis of functional integration to obtain the formula for the evaluation of the matrix element of a physical operator of the type 4.82 ? How can we avoid the difficulty related to the normalization factor in the evaluation of these matrix elements? In order to answer these questions, we define the matrix element of a physical operator using the quantum mechanical definition. We limit ourselves to the quantum mechanical evaluation of the matrix element of the operator of a physical quantity F. We consider the Heisenberg localized state | q i , t i ⟩. Suppose the initial time moment t i corresponds to the initial state | q i , t i ⟩ and the final time moment t f corresponds to the final state | q f , t f ⟩. Consider the Heisenberg operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_1.jpg"/> of a physical quantity Ϝ and t i ≤ t ≤ t f . By definition, considering the normalized state, the matrix element in the q representation of the operator F ̂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/inline10_2.jpg"/> at the given time moment t is given by the relation: 10.1 F if = q f , t f | F ̂ t | q i , t i q f , t f q i , t i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003145554/875ff22b-09e9-4373-a808-2051f13516c8/content/eqn10_1.jpg"/>