Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science

Quantum gating at a distance

Ian S. Osborne

Published Feb 4, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum Systems The processing of quantum information is reliant on the encoding and manipulation of quantum states of a qubit. Superconducting circuits are the most advanced platform at present, but there is an issue with cross-talk between the qubits and the challenge of error correction as the systems are scaled up. Another approach being pursued is a modular platform in which the qubits are spatially separated. Daiss et al. demonstrate the operation of a quantum gate in which one qubit conditionally controls the state of another qubit spatially separated by 60 meters (see the Perspective by Hunger). Because the approach is platform independent, it could be extended from the demonstrated neutral atoms to ions, impurity vacancy centers, or even a combination of these qubits. Science , this issue p. [614][1]; see also p. [576][2] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.abe3150 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.abg1536

DOI
10.1126/science.371.6529.580-g

Related papers

Teleporting a trapped-ion quantum gate

Ian S. Osborne

Quantum Physics Gating—controlling the state of one qubit conditioned on the state of another—is a key procedure in all quantum information processors. As the scale of quantum processors increases, the qubits will need to interact over larger and larger distances, which presents an experimental challenge in solid-state architectures. Wan et al. implemented the 20-year-old theoretical proposal of quantum gate teleportation that allows separated qubits to interact effectively. They deterministically teleported a controlled-NOT gate between two computational qubits in spatially separated zones in a segmented ion trap, demonstrating a feasible route toward scalable quantum information processors. Science , this issue p. [875][1] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aaw9415

Science•May 30, 2019•0 citations

Toward Scalable Quantum Computing: A Comparative Review of Qubit Platforms

Yingchang Zhang

Quantum computation has emerged as a prominent research field with the potential to revolutionize information processing. Recent advancements have focused on extending qubit coherence times and enhancing error correction and fault-tolerant protocols, achieving coherence time to gate time ratios as high as 10⁸ and reducing error rates to as low as 0.143% ± 0.003% per cycle for 101 qubit system. The next critical challenge lies in scaling up qubit systems to support large-scale quantum computation that exceeds the performance of classical supercomputer. In this study, we summarize the working mechanisms, physical properties, gate operations, and limitations of three leading qubit platforms—superconducting qubits, trapped-ion qubits, and neutral atom qubits. Through a systematic comparison, we identify the key challenges that hinder qubit system scalability. Finally, we outline future research directions to address these challenges, including exploring the fundamental physics underpinning long coherence times, improving control tools such as laser systems, enhancing material quality and fabrication precision, and investigating hybrid quantum architectures. We hope this study offers a valuable perspective for researchers working toward the development of scalable and reliable quantum computing systems.

International Conference on Communication Technology and Information Technology (ICCTIT)•Dec 26, 2025•0 citations

Quantum computing with neutral atoms

Mark E. Saffman

The power of quantum computation derives from algorithmic methods that exploit the availability of quantum superposition and entanglement to perform computations that are intractable with classical devices. The race is on to develop hardware that will unleash the promise of quantum algorithms. A handful of different types of hardware are currently being developed with the greatest efforts directed at superconducting, quantum-dot, trapped-ion, photonic, and neutral-atom approaches [1]. While all approaches have strengths and weaknesses, and are at different stages of development, the challenge of creating a practical design that can be scaled to a million or more qubits has not yet been met with any of the existing platforms. One may wonder if we really need a million qubits for a useful quantum computer. The answer depends on our ambition level. On the one hand it is widely believed that a quantum computer with less than 100 reliable qubits will be able to demonstrate a quantum advantage for a well defined computational problem [2]. Demonstration of a quantum computational advantage will generate great excitement in the halls of academia, but will have little broader import. A problem of great practical interest such as ab initio design of chemicals for increasing the yield of fertilizers for crop production, to name but one example, may also require just a few hundred qubits, provided computational sequences with circuit depth of 1010 or more operations can be reliably performed [3]. However, given the current performance of qubit hardware, which has demonstrated error rates not less than ∼10−3, computations with depth 1010 will only produce random outcomes of negligible value. The solution lies in the construction of error-correction circuitry operating on logical qubits, each composed of many physical qubits, which will enable logical error rates many orders of magnitude smaller than physical error rates. Although error correction is remarkably efficient for classical computing devices—Hamming codes detect and correct errors while only requiring roughly 10% overhead in the number of physical bits—quantum error correction is notoriously expensive. New approaches to error correction are the subject of intensive research with one promising direction being the development of codes that are optimized to suppress the dominant error mechanism in a particular physical platform [4,5]. Nevertheless, with physical error rates of 10−4, a plausible target for current qubit systems, the overhead required to reach logical error rates of 10−10 may be measured in thousands of physical qubits for each logical qubit. Thus a quantum computer able to perform deep calculations on a few hundred logical qubits could require a million physical qubits. A consequence of the cost of quantum error correction is that any viable approach to large-scale quantum computing needs to combine high-fidelity quantum logic operations with a capability for integrating large numbers of physical qubits. From this perspective neutral-atom qubits appear particularly promising [6] as they have already demonstrated control of more qubits than any other platform with recent experiments in 1D [7], 2D [8,9], and 3D [10] geometries showing control of up to 50 atomic qubits. Large qubit arrays can potentially be prepared in 1D, 2D, or 3D geometries. The number of proximal qubits increases with the dimensionality, which is advantageous for implementation of error correction code words, and points towards a preference for 2D or 3D arrays. On the other hand, the added overhead of compensating crosstalk incurred when targeting atoms inside a 3D volume makes parallel operations on multiple qubits challenging. A 2D geometry, as shown schematically in Fig. 1, may be an optimal choice since qubit control and measurement can be performed with lasers propagating normal to the plane of the array so that individual qubit sites can be addressed independently. With demonstrated array periods of a few micrometers we require a footprint of less than 1 mm2 for 104 qubits. Conceptual picture of a 2D neutral-atom qubit array. a) High-numerical-aperture lenses project several different wavelengths of light for control and measurement of the qubits. Specific choices of optical wavelengths depend on the atomic species. Not shown are optics for initial laser cooling, transport to the array, beam scanning, and imaging for qubit measurement. b) Averaged fluorescence image of 49 atomic qubits on a 2D grid with |$3.8 \, {\mu} \rm {m}$| spacing [8]. From a fundamental perspective the prospects for scaling neutral-atom systems are particularly promising due to the exceptionally large ratio between coherent and incoherent coupling rates. Neutral-atom qubits are encoded in hyperfine ground states for which coherence times of the order of 10 s have been demonstrated [10]. This implies a dephasing rate |$\gamma \sim 0.1 \, \rm s^{-1}$|⁠. The coherent coupling that enables quantum logic operations is switched on by exciting atoms to high-lying Rydberg states with principal quantum number close to 100 [11,12]. Rydberg excited atoms at spacings of a few micrometers in an optical lattice interact coherently with rates |$g > 10^9\, \rm s^{-1}$|⁠. The ratio between desired coherent coupling and residual incoherent dephasing of g/γ ∼ 1010 establishes a figure of merit that is enabling for scalability. To our knowledge only trapped ions can claim a similar g/γ ratio [13], but without a correspondingly direct path towards controlling thousands of qubits in a single processing unit. Although the g/γ ratio is exceptionally favorable for neutral-atom qubits a complete set of universal gate operations has not yet been demonstrated with high fidelity. Single-qubit gates in large 2D and 3D arrays have reached fidelity |${\mathcal {F}}\sim 0.999$| [8,10]. However, the highest demonstrated fidelity for two-qubit entanglement mediated by Rydberg-state interactions is |${\mathcal {F}}< 0.8$| [6,14,15], a value that is well short of the theoretical limit of |${\mathcal {F}}> 0.9999$| [16,17]. There is healthy optimism within the research community working with neutral-atom qubits that combining improved laser sources with reduced noise, better cooling to reduce motional dephasing, and control of stray electric fields that perturb Rydberg atoms will lead to substantially improved gate fidelity in the near future. Recent results with better filtering of laser phase noise have already demonstrated remarkable improvement in ground–Rydberg entanglement [18]. The outlook for the next few years appears very promising. We anticipate that with advances in lasers, optical lattices for atom trapping, deterministic rearrangement and loading of atoms in multi-dimensional arrays [19,20], and optics for fast beam scanning it will be possible to increase the number of physical qubits in a single neutral-atom module to at least 104. A challenging yet plausible path to a million-qubit processor can then be contemplated by connecting 100 such modules with atom–photon entanglement channels [21]. Beyond the potential for advancing the state of the art in computation, development of techniques for single-atom control inside large multi-atom arrays will enable other applications of quantum science including metrology and time-keeping. Rydberg interactions that are at the heart of a neutral-atom quantum computer may lead to multi-atom entanglement and Heisenberg scaling of atomic-clock precision [22]. This work was supported by the NSF and ARL CDQI.

National Science Review•Sep 9, 2018•70 citations

Entanglement goes large

Ian S. Osborne

Quantum Physics The success of quantum computing relies on the ability to entangle large-scale systems. Various platforms are being pursued, with architectures based on superconducting qubits and trapped atoms being the most advanced. By entangling up to 20 qubits, Omran et al. and Song et al. —working with Rydberg atom qubits and superconducting qubits, respectively—demonstrate how far these platforms have reached. The demonstrated controllable generation and detection of entanglement on such quantum systems is promising for the development of large-scale quantum processors. Science , this issue p. [570][1], p. [574][2] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aax9743 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aay0600

Science•Aug 8, 2019•0 citations

Toward Scalable Quantum Computing with Superconducting Circuits

Michael Kerschbaum

Quantum computing holds the promise of solving problems that are intractable for classical computers, with applications ranging from optimization and materials simulation to cryptography. It achieves this by leveraging the exponentially scaling dimensionality of the space encoding quantum information and by executing algorithms on quantum registers in superposition states – a feature often referred to as quantum parallelism. However, while encoding information in computational units capable of exploring a continuous set of quantum states enables exponential scaling of computational power with system size, quantum systems are also more susceptible to errors than their classical counterparts. These errors take the form of both control errors, where miscalibration of the control pulses causes coherent errors on the qubit states, as well as incoherent errors due to energy relaxation and dephasing. Scaling quantum systems to run useful algorithms involving hundreds or thousands of logical qubits will require quantum error correction. In this approach, quantum information is redundantly encoded across an entangled state of many physical qubits. This has enabled experimental demonstrations across various platforms – including ion traps, superconducting circuits, and neutral atoms – showing that encoded quantum states can be preserved beyond the coherence times of the constituting physical qubits. However, quantum state preservation is only one component needed for scalable quantum computing. To execute algorithms, it is also necessary to implement quantum gates on and between encoded qubits, in a way that maintains fault tolerance by preserving the ability to correct errors as they occur during the computation. In the first part of this thesis, we demonstrate the implementation of an error-corrected quantum operation that entangles two logical qubits. This is achieved by performing lattice surgery on a distance-three surface code qubit, resulting in a logical Bell state encoded in distance-three repetition codes, which enable the correction of single bit-flip errors. We further introduce techniques to benchmark and characterize the performance of logical operations, including applying the protocol to arbitrary logical input states and performing logical quantum process tomography. Together, these results constitute one of the first realizations of error-corrected lattice surgery in superconducting circuits. While quantum error correction can correct errors provided they occur with sufficiently low frequency, it may fail when many qubits experience errors simultaneously. In the second part of this thesis, we therefore shift focus to a specific error mechanism known to cause correlated errors in superconducting circuits – quasiparticle-induced decoherence. In this case, various forms of energy deposition on the quantum device can break Cooper pairs into quasiparticles, which may subsequently diffuse to the tunnel junction and interact with the qubit state, thereby causing decoherence. In this thesis, we investigate the impact of quasiparticle tunneling on qubit performance, with a focus on infrared-induced quasiparticles. We compare the sensitivity of niobium-based qubits to those made from tantalum – a material that has gained interest in recent years following demonstrations of qubits with improved coherence times based on this material. Using a thermal radiator source, we show that the performance of tantalum qubits may be limited by infrared-induced quasiparticles in typical superconducting circuit experimental setups. By employing both ambient and in-line infrared filters, we investigate the effectiveness of different filtering strategies and develop best practices for engineering cryogenic environments for superconducting quantum processors. The results presented in this thesis contribute to the advancement of quantum computing based on superconducting circuits by implementing and characterizing quantum error-corrected operations, and by investigating quasiparticles as a source of decoherence, along with strategies to improve infrared filtering and signal conditioning in cryogenic environments for future fault-tolerant quantum computing.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

A sound proposition for quantum communication

Ian S. Osborne

Quantum Processing Quantum computers exploit the quantum-mechanical properties of materials to store and manipulate information stored in the quantum states of atoms or artificial atoms. Although there are a number of quantum platforms under investigation already, Gustafsson et al. present another, based on the propagation of sound waves on the surface of a crystal (see the Perspective by Ruskov and Tahan). The ability to tune the system and the slow propagation speeds of the acoustic waves offer new opportunities to control and process quantum information. Science , this issue p. [207][1]; see also p. [165][2] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1257219 [2]: /lookup/volpage/346/165?iss=6206

Science•Oct 9, 2014•0 citations
Quantum Systems
The processing of quantum information is reliant on the encoding and manipulation of quantum states of a qubit. Superconducting circuits are the most advanced platform at present, but there is an issue with cross-talk between the qubits and the challenge of error correction as the systems are scaled up. Another approach being pursued is a modular platform in which the qubits are spatially separated. Daiss et al. demonstrate the operation of a quantum gate in which one qubit conditionally controls the state of another qubit spatially separated by 60 meters (see the Perspective by Hunger). Because the approach is platform independent, it could be extended from the demonstrated neutral atoms to ions, impurity vacancy centers, or even a combination of these qubits.
Science , this issue p. 614; see also p. 576
Quantum Physics Gating—controlling the state of one qubit conditioned on the state of another—is a key procedure in all quantum information processors. As the scale of quantum processors increases, the qubits will need to interact over larger and larger distances, which presents an experimental challenge in solid-state architectures. Wan et al. implemented the 20-year-old theoretical proposal of quantum gate teleportation that allows separated qubits to interact effectively. They deterministically teleported a controlled-NOT gate between two computational qubits in spatially separated zones in a segmented ion trap, demonstrating a feasible route toward scalable quantum information processors. Science , this issue p. [875][1] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aaw9415
Quantum computation has emerged as a prominent research field with the potential to revolutionize information processing. Recent advancements have focused on extending qubit coherence times and enhancing error correction and fault-tolerant protocols, achieving coherence time to gate time ratios as high as 10⁸ and reducing error rates to as low as 0.143% ± 0.003% per cycle for 101 qubit system. The next critical challenge lies in scaling up qubit systems to support large-scale quantum computation that exceeds the performance of classical supercomputer. In this study, we summarize the working mechanisms, physical properties, gate operations, and limitations of three leading qubit platforms—superconducting qubits, trapped-ion qubits, and neutral atom qubits. Through a systematic comparison, we identify the key challenges that hinder qubit system scalability. Finally, we outline future research directions to address these challenges, including exploring the fundamental physics underpinning long coherence times, improving control tools such as laser systems, enhancing material quality and fabrication precision, and investigating hybrid quantum architectures. We hope this study offers a valuable perspective for researchers working toward the development of scalable and reliable quantum computing systems.
The power of quantum computation derives from algorithmic methods that exploit the availability of quantum superposition and entanglement to perform computations that are intractable with classical devices. The race is on to develop hardware that will unleash the promise of quantum algorithms. A handful of different types of hardware are currently being developed with the greatest efforts directed at superconducting, quantum-dot, trapped-ion, photonic, and neutral-atom approaches [1]. While all approaches have strengths and weaknesses, and are at different stages of development, the challenge of creating a practical design that can be scaled to a million or more qubits has not yet been met with any of the existing platforms. One may wonder if we really need a million qubits for a useful quantum computer. The answer depends on our ambition level. On the one hand it is widely believed that a quantum computer with less than 100 reliable qubits will be able to demonstrate a quantum advantage for a well defined computational problem [2]. Demonstration of a quantum computational advantage will generate great excitement in the halls of academia, but will have little broader import. A problem of great practical interest such as ab initio design of chemicals for increasing the yield of fertilizers for crop production, to name but one example, may also require just a few hundred qubits, provided computational sequences with circuit depth of 1010 or more operations can be reliably performed [3]. However, given the current performance of qubit hardware, which has demonstrated error rates not less than ∼10−3, computations with depth 1010 will only produce random outcomes of negligible value. The solution lies in the construction of error-correction circuitry operating on logical qubits, each composed of many physical qubits, which will enable logical error rates many orders of magnitude smaller than physical error rates. Although error correction is remarkably efficient for classical computing devices—Hamming codes detect and correct errors while only requiring roughly 10% overhead in the number of physical bits—quantum error correction is notoriously expensive. New approaches to error correction are the subject of intensive research with one promising direction being the development of codes that are optimized to suppress the dominant error mechanism in a particular physical platform [4,5]. Nevertheless, with physical error rates of 10−4, a plausible target for current qubit systems, the overhead required to reach logical error rates of 10−10 may be measured in thousands of physical qubits for each logical qubit. Thus a quantum computer able to perform deep calculations on a few hundred logical qubits could require a million physical qubits. A consequence of the cost of quantum error correction is that any viable approach to large-scale quantum computing needs to combine high-fidelity quantum logic operations with a capability for integrating large numbers of physical qubits. From this perspective neutral-atom qubits appear particularly promising [6] as they have already demonstrated control of more qubits than any other platform with recent experiments in 1D [7], 2D [8,9], and 3D [10] geometries showing control of up to 50 atomic qubits. Large qubit arrays can potentially be prepared in 1D, 2D, or 3D geometries. The number of proximal qubits increases with the dimensionality, which is advantageous for implementation of error correction code words, and points towards a preference for 2D or 3D arrays. On the other hand, the added overhead of compensating crosstalk incurred when targeting atoms inside a 3D volume makes parallel operations on multiple qubits challenging. A 2D geometry, as shown schematically in Fig. 1, may be an optimal choice since qubit control and measurement can be performed with lasers propagating normal to the plane of the array so that individual qubit sites can be addressed independently. With demonstrated array periods of a few micrometers we require a footprint of less than 1 mm2 for 104 qubits. Conceptual picture of a 2D neutral-atom qubit array. a) High-numerical-aperture lenses project several different wavelengths of light for control and measurement of the qubits. Specific choices of optical wavelengths depend on the atomic species. Not shown are optics for initial laser cooling, transport to the array, beam scanning, and imaging for qubit measurement. b) Averaged fluorescence image of 49 atomic qubits on a 2D grid with |3.8 μm3.8 \, {\mu} \rm {m}3.8μm| spacing [8]. From a fundamental perspective the prospects for scaling neutral-atom systems are particularly promising due to the exceptionally large ratio between coherent and incoherent coupling rates. Neutral-atom qubits are encoded in hyperfine ground states for which coherence times of the order of 10 s have been demonstrated [10]. This implies a dephasing rate |γ∼0.1 s−1\gamma \sim 0.1 \, \rm s^{-1}γ∼0.1s−1|⁠. The coherent coupling that enables quantum logic operations is switched on by exciting atoms to high-lying Rydberg states with principal quantum number close to 100 [11,12]. Rydberg excited atoms at spacings of a few micrometers in an optical lattice interact coherently with rates |g>109 s−1g > 10^9\, \rm s^{-1}g>109s−1|⁠. The ratio between desired coherent coupling and residual incoherent dephasing of g/γ ∼ 1010 establishes a figure of merit that is enabling for scalability. To our knowledge only trapped ions can claim a similar g/γ ratio [13], but without a correspondingly direct path towards controlling thousands of qubits in a single processing unit. Although the g/γ ratio is exceptionally favorable for neutral-atom qubits a complete set of universal gate operations has not yet been demonstrated with high fidelity. Single-qubit gates in large 2D and 3D arrays have reached fidelity |F∼0.999{\mathcal {F}}\sim 0.999F∼0.999| [8,10]. However, the highest demonstrated fidelity for two-qubit entanglement mediated by Rydberg-state interactions is |F<0.8{\mathcal {F}}< 0.8F<0.8| [6,14,15], a value that is well short of the theoretical limit of |F>0.9999{\mathcal {F}}> 0.9999F>0.9999| [16,17]. There is healthy optimism within the research community working with neutral-atom qubits that combining improved laser sources with reduced noise, better cooling to reduce motional dephasing, and control of stray electric fields that perturb Rydberg atoms will lead to substantially improved gate fidelity in the near future. Recent results with better filtering of laser phase noise have already demonstrated remarkable improvement in ground–Rydberg entanglement [18]. The outlook for the next few years appears very promising. We anticipate that with advances in lasers, optical lattices for atom trapping, deterministic rearrangement and loading of atoms in multi-dimensional arrays [19,20], and optics for fast beam scanning it will be possible to increase the number of physical qubits in a single neutral-atom module to at least 104. A challenging yet plausible path to a million-qubit processor can then be contemplated by connecting 100 such modules with atom–photon entanglement channels [21]. Beyond the potential for advancing the state of the art in computation, development of techniques for single-atom control inside large multi-atom arrays will enable other applications of quantum science including metrology and time-keeping. Rydberg interactions that are at the heart of a neutral-atom quantum computer may lead to multi-atom entanglement and Heisenberg scaling of atomic-clock precision [22]. This work was supported by the NSF and ARL CDQI.
Quantum Physics The success of quantum computing relies on the ability to entangle large-scale systems. Various platforms are being pursued, with architectures based on superconducting qubits and trapped atoms being the most advanced. By entangling up to 20 qubits, Omran et al. and Song et al. —working with Rydberg atom qubits and superconducting qubits, respectively—demonstrate how far these platforms have reached. The demonstrated controllable generation and detection of entanglement on such quantum systems is promising for the development of large-scale quantum processors. Science , this issue p. [570][1], p. [574][2] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aax9743 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aay0600
Quantum computing holds the promise of solving problems that are intractable for classical computers, with applications ranging from optimization and materials simulation to cryptography. It achieves this by leveraging the exponentially scaling dimensionality of the space encoding quantum information and by executing algorithms on quantum registers in superposition states – a feature often referred to as quantum parallelism. However, while encoding information in computational units capable of exploring a continuous set of quantum states enables exponential scaling of computational power with system size, quantum systems are also more susceptible to errors than their classical counterparts. These errors take the form of both control errors, where miscalibration of the control pulses causes coherent errors on the qubit states, as well as incoherent errors due to energy relaxation and dephasing. Scaling quantum systems to run useful algorithms involving hundreds or thousands of logical qubits will require quantum error correction. In this approach, quantum information is redundantly encoded across an entangled state of many physical qubits. This has enabled experimental demonstrations across various platforms – including ion traps, superconducting circuits, and neutral atoms – showing that encoded quantum states can be preserved beyond the coherence times of the constituting physical qubits. However, quantum state preservation is only one component needed for scalable quantum computing. To execute algorithms, it is also necessary to implement quantum gates on and between encoded qubits, in a way that maintains fault tolerance by preserving the ability to correct errors as they occur during the computation. In the first part of this thesis, we demonstrate the implementation of an error-corrected quantum operation that entangles two logical qubits. This is achieved by performing lattice surgery on a distance-three surface code qubit, resulting in a logical Bell state encoded in distance-three repetition codes, which enable the correction of single bit-flip errors. We further introduce techniques to benchmark and characterize the performance of logical operations, including applying the protocol to arbitrary logical input states and performing logical quantum process tomography. Together, these results constitute one of the first realizations of error-corrected lattice surgery in superconducting circuits. While quantum error correction can correct errors provided they occur with sufficiently low frequency, it may fail when many qubits experience errors simultaneously. In the second part of this thesis, we therefore shift focus to a specific error mechanism known to cause correlated errors in superconducting circuits – quasiparticle-induced decoherence. In this case, various forms of energy deposition on the quantum device can break Cooper pairs into quasiparticles, which may subsequently diffuse to the tunnel junction and interact with the qubit state, thereby causing decoherence. In this thesis, we investigate the impact of quasiparticle tunneling on qubit performance, with a focus on infrared-induced quasiparticles. We compare the sensitivity of niobium-based qubits to those made from tantalum – a material that has gained interest in recent years following demonstrations of qubits with improved coherence times based on this material. Using a thermal radiator source, we show that the performance of tantalum qubits may be limited by infrared-induced quasiparticles in typical superconducting circuit experimental setups. By employing both ambient and in-line infrared filters, we investigate the effectiveness of different filtering strategies and develop best practices for engineering cryogenic environments for superconducting quantum processors. The results presented in this thesis contribute to the advancement of quantum computing based on superconducting circuits by implementing and characterizing quantum error-corrected operations, and by investigating quasiparticles as a source of decoherence, along with strategies to improve infrared filtering and signal conditioning in cryogenic environments for future fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Quantum Processing Quantum computers exploit the quantum-mechanical properties of materials to store and manipulate information stored in the quantum states of atoms or artificial atoms. Although there are a number of quantum platforms under investigation already, Gustafsson et al. present another, based on the propagation of sound waves on the surface of a crystal (see the Perspective by Ruskov and Tahan). The ability to tune the system and the slow propagation speeds of the acoustic waves offer new opportunities to control and process quantum information. Science , this issue p. [207][1]; see also p. [165][2] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1257219 [2]: /lookup/volpage/346/165?iss=6206