Princeton University Press eBooks

Quantum Mechanics without Probability Amplitudes

William K. Wootters

Published Jul 5, 2017• 0 citations

Abstract

First steps are taken toward a formulation of quantum mechanics which avoids the use of probability amplitudes and is expressed entirely in terms of observable probabilities. Quantum states are represented not by state vectors or density matrices but by “probability tables,” which contain only the probabilities of the outcomes of certain special measurements. The rule for computing transition probabilities, normally given by the squared modulus of the inner product of two state vectors, is re-expressed in terms of probability tables. The new version of the rule is surprisingly simple, especially when one considers that the notion of complex phases, so crucial in the evaluation of inner products, is entirely absent from the representation of states used here.

DOI: 10.1515/9781400886975-035

Related papers

Spontaneous symmetry breaking

Parthasarathi Mitra

In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, observables are represented by operators in a Hilbert space and states by vectors in it. Quantum field theory too is formulated in terms of field operators. States in field theory include the vacuum state, one particle states, two particle states and so on. One does not measure operators or state vectors, however; measurements involve eigenvalues of operators or transition probabilities between states. It turns out that one can formulate quantum mechanics and field theory without using operators. Indeed, the probability amplitude for a transition from a position q1 at time t1 to a position q2 at time t2 can be expressed as a path integral ∫ dt L(q(t),q˙(t)), (5.1) where q(t) runs over all possible functions satisfying the conditions q(t1) = q1, q(t2) = q2 (5.2) and the integral over q(t) is an integral over all such paths of the exponential evaluated for each path. The measure of integration is not well defined a priori, but it is possible to give prescriptions that make sense. In classical mechanics, positions at two different times determine a path from the second order differential equation of motion, which yields a definite solution if two conditions are imposed. In contrast, quantum mechanics does not allow us to talk about trajectories. The path integral formulation manifestly refers to the myriad paths that may be taken by a particle in going from one point to another. It goes so far as to assign a probability amplitude to each path, and it is related to the classical action corresponding to that path. However, it is complex and it also involves a superposition, characteristic of quantum mechanics.

CRC Press eBooksMay 14, 20141 citation

States as Vectors

Tilak Sinha

From here, we take up the task of reformulating quantum mechanics in the language of inner product space. We start by introducing vector space through the familiar example of a set of finite dimensional, complex, column matrices under addition and multiplication by scalars. The inner product is then introduced as a dot product generalized to complex vectors leading to the idea of an inner product space . This is adequate to show how the concept of a quantum state can be described by a normalized vector in an inner product space so that the state space can be identified with the inner product space. Amplitudes are associated with inner products , and observables with orthonormal bases in this space. Hence the laws of quantum mechanics are reformulated. We then point out that the now reformulated laws are independent of the space of description and the reader is urged to contemplate an universality which would reflect the independence with respect to the representation space . This creates the stage for the introduction of the abstract inner product space and the formulation of quantum mechanics in this setting. The chapter concludes with this description. The transformed laws are now called postulatesof quantum mechanics .

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooksJun 18, 20210 citations

Quantum Probability

Heinz‐Peter Breuer, Francesco Petruccione

Abstract This chapter develops the fundamental notions and concepts of the probabilistic and statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. It begins with a brief review of the mathematical structure given by a Hilbert space of state vectors and an algebra of observables represented by selfadjoint operators. Special emphasis is laid on the connection between the spectral representation of a selfadjoint operator and a corresponding random variable that describes the possible measurement outcomes. The chapter further introduces the concepts of a composite quantum system, of the reduced density matrix, and of entangled quantum states. A section on quantum entropies is included, as well as the mathematical formulation of the generalized theory of quantum measurements in terms of completely positive quantum operations and effects.

Jan 25, 20070 citations

THE DENSITY MATRIX

Murray, Iii Sargent

In Chap. 2 we solved for the probability amplitudes Ca and C.b explicitly. The results of our discussion, such as the probability of a transition or the value of the induced dipole moment, were invariably expressed in terms of bilinear combinations of the amplitudes, such as CaCa* and CaCi>*. In fact, the expectation value of any observable involves bilinear combinations. Hence an alternative formulation of quantum mechanics consists of dealing with the bilinear quantities directly. The method involves organizing the quantities in a matrix form called the density matrix. There are two principal advantages in doing so. First, the resulting mathematics is often simpler. Sec ond, when the wave function for an ensemble of systems is not known but the probabilities for having various different wave functions are known, the en semble can be described by a weighted sum of individual density matrices. In particular, the amplitudes cannot themselves describe simply certain com mon statistical phenomena, such as the effects of elastic collisions on the in duced dipole moments of atoms.

CRC Press eBooksMar 5, 20180 citations

Why square roots of probabilities?

Kevin H. Knuth

Square roots of probabilities appear in several contexts, which suggests that they are somehow more fundamental than probabilities.Square roots of probabilities appear in expressions of the Fisher-Rao Metric and the Hellinger-Bhattacharyya distance.They also come into play in Quantum Mechanics via the Born rule where probabilities are found by taking the squared modulus of the quantum amplitude.Why should this be the case and why do these square roots not arise in the various formulations of probability theory?In this short, inconclusive exploration, I consider quantifying a logical statement with a vector defined by a set of components each quantifying one of the atomic statements defining the hypothesis space.I show that conditional probabilities (bi-valuations), such as P(x|y), can be written as the dot product of the two vectors quantifying the logical statements x and y each normalized with respect to the vector quantifying the conditional y.The components of the vectors are proportional to the square root of the probability.As a result, this formulation is shown to be consistent with a concept of orthogonality applied to the set of mutually exclusive atomic statements such that the sum rule is represented as the sum of the squares of the square roots of probability.

arXiv:1603.08427AIP conference proceedingsJan 1, 20164 citations

Probability Amplitudes

F. J. Duarte

Quantum mechanics runs on probability amplitudes. Probability amplitudes must accurately describe the physics prior to calculating the quantum probability. Symbolical probability amplitudes are mathematically represented by complex wave functions. Many physicists in the field don’t even mention the words probability amplitude and prefer to refer to wave function, or state, instead. When they do that they miss out on the subtleties of the physics at hand. In this brief chapter we emphasize probability amplitudes à la Dirac since that is the way Feynman and Ward preferred to describe quantum mechanics. The Dirac notation is also ideally suited to describe quantum interference and quantum entanglement.

CRC Press eBooksApr 10, 20260 citations