Reply to “Comment on ‘Past of a quantum particle revisited’ ”
Berthold‐Georg Englert, Kelvin Horia, Jibo Dai +2 more
We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.
arXiv:1901.05673•Physical Review A•Feb 27, 2019•17 citations