In the Maxwell continuum wave theory of light, a photodetector measures the intensity of the Electro Magnetic wave. The output current of the photodetector is proportional to the intensity of input light. Since the introduction of the concept of photon, or the concept of field quantization, physicists started to premeditate single-photon detection, theoretically and experimentally. Due to slight differences in their optical paths, at certain locations, the radiations superposed constructively, at other locations the field superposed destructively. A sinusoidal modulation is thus observable. However, people found this interpretation may not be appropriate when the experimental physicists improved the sensitivity of their photodetector to the single-photon level. Almost everyone was surprised that the interference was still observable in the observation plane, and the sinusoidal modulation observed from single-photon was exactly the same as before. A single-photon counting detector is able to count photons one by one.
In the Maxwell continuum wave theory of light, a photodetector measures the intensity of the Electro Magnetic wave. The output current of the photodetector is proportional to the intensity of input light. Since the introduction of the concept of photon, or the concept of field quantization, physicists started to premeditate single-photon detection, theoretically and experimentally. Due to slight differences in their optical paths, at certain locations, the radiations superposed constructively, at other locations the field superposed destructively. A sinusoidal modulation is thus observable. However, people found this interpretation may not be appropriate when the experimental physicists improved the sensitivity of their photodetector to the single-photon level. Almost everyone was surprised that the interference was still observable in the observation plane, and the sinusoidal modulation observed from single-photon was exactly the same as before. A single-photon counting detector is able to count photons one by one.
In optical quantum information processing, two of the most basic elements are the sources of quantum mechanical states of light, and the devices that can detect these states. In this chapter, we narrow this down to photon sources and photodetectors. We will describe first how detectors work, starting from abstract ideal detectors, via a complete description of realistic detectors in terms of POVMS, to a brief overview of current photodetectors. Subsequently, we will define what is a single-photon source, and how we can determine experimentally whether a source produces single photons or something else. Having laid down the ground rules, we will survey some of the most popular ways photons are produced in the laboratory. Finally, we take a look at the production of entangled photon sources and quantum non-demolition measurements of photons. A mathematical model of photodetectors Photodetectors are devices that produce a macroscopic signal when triggered by one or more photons. In the ideal situation, every photon that hits the detector contributes to the macroscopic signal, and there are no ‘ghost’ signals, or so-called dark counts. In this situation we can define two types of detector, namely the ‘photon-number detector’, and ‘detectors without number resolution’. First, the photon number detector is a (largely hypothetical) device that tells us how many photons there are in a given optical mode that is properly localized in space and time. This property is called ‘photon-number resolution’.
Quantum mechanics cements the intimate relationship between the nature of light and its detection. Historically, quantum theories of photodetection have generally fallen into two categories: the first tries to determine what quantum field observable is measured when photoelectrons are detected, laying the theoretical groundwork for photodetection being possible. The second type are phenomenological theories, which take great care to model the details of specific photodetectors. In this dissertation, we fill in the gap between these two models in the modern literature on photodetection by constructing a fully quantum-mechanical and sufficiently realistic model that includes all stages of the photodetection process. We accomplish this within the framework of quantum information theory using the language of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). \n\nA POVM provides the most general description of a quantum measurement. In the context of single-photon detection, the photodetector POVM provides a complete characterization of the single-photon detector (SPD) from which all figures of merit can be calculated. Each element of the POVM is comprised of a weighted sum over single-photon state projectors. To construct SPD POVMs, we identify the states projected onto by a measurement and the associated weights. We first accomplish this for a simple time-dependent system, laying out how to efficiently project onto arbitrary single-photon states. Then, we describe the three stages of a realistic SPD: transmission, amplification, and measurement.\n\nIn the transmission stage of photodetection a photon enters a network of discrete energy levels, its energy propagating through that network and finally exiting into another output continuum of modes, a process entirely described by a single complex function. In the amplification stage of photodetection, a single excitation is amplified into a macroscopic signal via a nonlinear amplification mechanism. In the final stage, an inefficient ``classical'' measurement is made on the macroscopic signal. By combining these three stages we form a chain of inference from the final ``click'' to the input photon and construct a POVM projecting onto the input Hilbert space. Lastly, we discuss limits and tradeoffs that arise at each stage and implications for photodetection applications.\n\nThis dissertation contains previously published and unpublished material.
The wave aspect of light is observed experimentally through interference phenomena, and in a certain sense such observations always require a division of the given (initial) light field into two or more space-time parts. The division can only be done by introducing matter (massive particles) in the field region, and the light-matter interaction inevitably changes the initial state of the field. Not least when one is dealing with single and few-photon interference, it is good to remember again a central point of Niels Bohr, namely that no elementary phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is a registered (observed) phenomenon. It turns out that it is possible to observe interference with a quantized electromagnetic field which contains only one photon. Since the irreversible final detection destroys the photon, it is in practice necessary to repeat the experiment starting from the same initial (given) conditions. Below we shall discuss the basics of single-photon interference in the simplest terms.
The idea of the photon has stirred the imaginations of physicists ever since 1905 when Einstein originally proposed the use of light quanta to explain the photoelectric effect. This concept is formalized in the quantum theory of radiation, which has had unfailing success in explaining the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter, seemingly limited only by the ability of physicists to perform the indicated calculations. Nevertheless, it has its conceptual problems—various infinities and frequent misinterpretations. Consequently an increasing number of workers are asking, “to what extent is the quantized field really necessary and useful?” In fact the experimental results of the photoelectric effect were explained by G. Wentzel in 1927 without the quantum theory of radiation. Similarly most electro-optic phenomena such as stimulated emission, reaction of the emitted field on the emitting atom, resonance fluorescence, and so on, do not require the quantization of the field for their explanation. As we will see, these processes can all be quantitatively explained and physically understood in terms of the semiclassical theory of the matter–field interaction in which the electric field is treated classically while the atoms obey the laws of quantum mechanics. The quantized field is fundamentally required for accurate descriptions of certain processes involving fluctuations in the electromagnetic field: for example, spontaneous emission, the Lamb shift, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and certain aspects of blackbody radiation. (The Compton effect also fits here, but see later under references 8b and c.) Here we will outline how the photon concept originated and developed, where it is not required and is often misused, and finally where it plays an essential role in the understanding of physical phenomena. In our discussion we will attempt to give a logically consistent definition of the word “photon”—a statement far more necessary than one might think, for so many contradictory uses exist of this elusive beast. In particular consider the original coining of the word by G. N. Lewis: “[because it appears to spend] only a minute fraction of its existence as a carrier of radiant energy, while the rest of the time it remains an important structural element within the atom…, I therefore take the liberty of proposing for this hypothetical new atom which is not light but plays an essential part in every process of radiation, the name photon!” (our exclamation point). Clearly the present usage of the word is very different.
Photons and electrons One of the great technical achievements of the second half of the 20th century was the invention of the laser. With its help extremely intense light could be produced. Furthermore, it even became posssible to excite a single resonator mode so that both the frequency and the propagation direction of the emitted radiation field are extraordinarily sharp. The mere existence of such high-intensity single-mode fields – the real problem that was ingeniously solved was to generate them – is no matter of surprise. We know from classical electromagnetic theory that the amplitude of a monochromatic electromagnetic field can take on arbitrarily large values. This is a direct consequence of the linearity of Maxwell's equations. What does this mean for quantized radiation fields? Certainly, the mentioned property of classical fields must also be retained in the quantum mechanical description. Since the electromagnetic energy is quantized in ‘packets’ of magnitude h ν (photons), the number of photons in a given mode must be unlimited, in principle. All this is very well known. However, it becomes noteworthy when we compare the behaviour of photons with that of electrons. Amazingly, it turns out that an electronic quantum state can be occupied by one electron, at maximum. (Strictly speaking, in the description of the electronic state the spin variable must be included.) This drastic difference in the collective behaviour of photons and electrons could, in fact, not be expected from what we know from single photons and electrons. Both of them have particle-like as well as wave-like properties. However, when many of them are present, they exhibit quite different a demeanour.
The quantum theory of light began in the early 20th century. The successful introduction of the concept of photon, or light quantum, stimulated a new foundation of physics, namely, the quantum theory. Today, quantum theory has turned out to be the overarching principle of modern physics. It would be difficult to find a single subject among the physical sciences which is not affected in its foundations or in its applications by quantum theory. The photon is a wave: it has no mass, it travels at the highest speed in the universe, and it interferes with itself. The photon is a particle: it has well-defined values of momentum and energy, and it even “spins” like a particle. Around the year of 1900, an unexpected observation happened in experimental physics. It was found that the experimentally observed spectral distribution of blackbody radiation disagreed with the theoretical predications of classical physics.