Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Layer Security for Combating Jammers and Eavesdroppers

Mahdi M. Chehimi

Published Sep 23, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Physical Layer Security Game: Interaction between Source, Eavesdropper, and Friendly Jammer

Ninoslav Marina, Are Hjørungnes, Merouane Abdelkader Debbah +1 more

•Jan 1, 2009•7 citations

Physical-Layer Security in Distributed Wireless Networks Using Matching Theory

Siavash Bayat, Raymond H. Y. Louie, Zhu Han +2 more

We consider the use of physical-layer security in a wireless communication system where multiple jamming nodes assist multiple source-destination nodes in combating unwanted eavesdropping from a single eavesdropper. In particular, we propose a distributed algorithm that matches each source-destination pair with a particular jammer. Our algorithm caters for three channel state information (CSI) assumptions: global CSI, local CSI, and local CSI without the eavesdropper channel. We prove that our algorithm has many desirable properties. First, the outcome of the proposed algorithm results in a stable matching, which is important if the source and jamming nodes are selfish. Second, the secrecy rate of the proposed algorithm converges to the secrecy rate of a centralized optimal solution, if the price step-number is sufficiently small. Third, our algorithm converges only after a small number of iterations, and its overhead is relatively small. Fourth, our algorithm has a significantly lower complexity than a centralized optimal approach.

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security•Mar 6, 2013•76 citations

Communication Security through Physical-Layer Techniques

Ahmed Aladi

•Aug 1, 2023•0 citations

Physical layer security techniques for future wireless communication systems against eavesdropping

Haji Muhammad Furqan Ahmed Madni

•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation

Enhancing Physical Layer Security Through Cooperation in Wireless Networks

Jovana Božović, Enis Kočan

Physical Layer Security (PLS) provides a promising complementary approach to cryptographic methods for protecting wireless communications from eavesdropping. This paper investigates secrecy enhancement through cooperative relaying and jamming in a wireless network with two legitimate users, one eavesdropper, and five potential relay nodes operating in amplify-and-forward mode. Three relay–jammer selection strategies are considered: random relay and jammer selection, best-SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) relay with random jammer selection, and best-SNR relay with a jammer chosen based on the strongest channel toward the eavesdropper. The secrecy performance of these strategies are evaluated in terms of secrecy rate and secrecy outage probability. The results demonstrate that intelligent relay and jammer selection can significantly improve PLS compared to random selection, highlighting the benefits of cooperation in secure wireless systems.

•Feb 24, 2026•0 citations

Existing Techniques in Physical Layer Security

Li Wang

Wireless networks•Aug 31, 2017•1 citation
We consider the use of physical-layer security in a wireless communication system where multiple jamming nodes assist multiple source-destination nodes in combating unwanted eavesdropping from a single eavesdropper. In particular, we propose a distributed algorithm that matches each source-destination pair with a particular jammer. Our algorithm caters for three channel state information (CSI) assumptions: global CSI, local CSI, and local CSI without the eavesdropper channel. We prove that our algorithm has many desirable properties. First, the outcome of the proposed algorithm results in a stable matching, which is important if the source and jamming nodes are selfish. Second, the secrecy rate of the proposed algorithm converges to the secrecy rate of a centralized optimal solution, if the price step-number is sufficiently small. Third, our algorithm converges only after a small number of iterations, and its overhead is relatively small. Fourth, our algorithm has a significantly lower complexity than a centralized optimal approach.
Physical Layer Security (PLS) provides a promising complementary approach to cryptographic methods for protecting wireless communications from eavesdropping. This paper investigates secrecy enhancement through cooperative relaying and jamming in a wireless network with two legitimate users, one eavesdropper, and five potential relay nodes operating in amplify-and-forward mode. Three relay–jammer selection strategies are considered: random relay and jammer selection, best-SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) relay with random jammer selection, and best-SNR relay with a jammer chosen based on the strongest channel toward the eavesdropper. The secrecy performance of these strategies are evaluated in terms of secrecy rate and secrecy outage probability. The results demonstrate that intelligent relay and jammer selection can significantly improve PLS compared to random selection, highlighting the benefits of cooperation in secure wireless systems.