Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

General error mitigation for quantum circuits

Manpreet Singh Jattana, Fengping Jin, Hans A. De Raedt, Kristel F. L. Michielsen

Published Jan 1, 2020• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Experimental implementation of error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits

Abhinav Kandala, Kristan Temme, Antonio Mezzacapo +4 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 6, 2018•0 citations

Scalable General Error Mitigation for Quantum Circuits

Philip Döbler, Jannik Pflieger, Fengping Jin +4 more

In quantum computing, error mitigation is a method to improve the results of an error-prone quantum processor by post-processing them on a classical computer. In this work, we improve the General Error Mitigation (GEM) method for scalability. GEM relies on the use of a matrix to represent the device error, which requires the execution of $2^{n+1}$ calibration circuits on the quantum hardware, where $n$ is the number of qubits. With our improved method, the number of calibration runs is independent of the number of qubits and depends only on the number of non-zero states in the output distribution. We run 1853 randomly generated circuits with widths between 2-7 qubits and depths between 10-140 gates on IBMQ superconducting devices. The experiments show that the mitigation works comparably well to GEM, while requiring a fraction of the calibration runs. Finally, an experiment to mitigate errors in a 100 qubit circuit demonstrates the scalable features of our method.

arXiv:2411.07916•Nov 12, 2024•0 citations

General error mitigation for quantum circuits

Manpreet Singh Jattana, Fengping Jin, Hans A. De Raedt +1 more

Abstract A general method to mitigate the effect of errors in quantum circuits is outlined. The method is developed in sight of characteristics that an ideal method should possess and to ameliorate an existing method which only mitigates state preparation and measurement errors. The method is tested on different IBM Q quantum devices, using randomly generated circuits with up to four qubits. A large majority of results show significant error mitigation.

arXiv:2011.10860•Quantum Information Processing•Nov 1, 2020•15 citations

Error Correction for Quantum Computers

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 1, 1998•0 citations

Circuit Based Error Detection and Correction Scheme for Quantum System

Zaman, Muhammad

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Fictitious Copy Quantum Error Mitigation

Akib Karim, Harish J. Vallury, Muhammad Usman

Errors are arguably the most pressing challenge impeding practical applications of quantum computers, which has instigated vigorous research on the development of quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques. Existing QEM methods suppress errors with a varying degree of efficacy but importantly demand significant additional quantum and classical computational resources. In this work, we present Fictitious Copy Quantum Error Mitigation (FCQEM) method which corrects quantum errors without requiring any additional quantum resources and purely relies on using classical postprocessing of a joint probability distribution to correct expectation values. The joint probability distribution can be measured ``fictitiously'' by sampling one copy of noisy quantum circuit twice, or classically squaring probabilities from simply one copy. We show that FCQEM can recover eigenvalues even if exact eigenstates are not prepared. Furthermore, our technique can benefit other noise mitigation techniques with no additional quantum resources, which is demonstrated by combining FCQEM with the Quantum Computed Moments (QCM) method. FCQEM can compensate for noise that is pathological to QCM, and QCM allows for FCQEM to recover the ground state energy with a larger variety of trial states. We show that our technique can find the exact ground state energy of molecular and spin models under simulated noise models as well as experiments on a Rigetti 84-qubit superconducting quantum processor. The reported FCQEM method is general purpose for the current generation of quantum devices and is applicable to any problem that measures eigenvalues of operators on sharply peaked distributions.

quant-pharXiv:2603.09302•Mar 11, 2026•0 citations
In quantum computing, error mitigation is a method to improve the results of an error-prone quantum processor by post-processing them on a classical computer. In this work, we improve the General Error Mitigation (GEM) method for scalability. GEM relies on the use of a matrix to represent the device error, which requires the execution of 2n+12^{n+1}2n+1 calibration circuits on the quantum hardware, where nnn is the number of qubits. With our improved method, the number of calibration runs is independent of the number of qubits and depends only on the number of non-zero states in the output distribution. We run 1853 randomly generated circuits with widths between 2-7 qubits and depths between 10-140 gates on IBMQ superconducting devices. The experiments show that the mitigation works comparably well to GEM, while requiring a fraction of the calibration runs. Finally, an experiment to mitigate errors in a 100 qubit circuit demonstrates the scalable features of our method.
Errors are arguably the most pressing challenge impeding practical applications of quantum computers, which has instigated vigorous research on the development of quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques. Existing QEM methods suppress errors with a varying degree of efficacy but importantly demand significant additional quantum and classical computational resources. In this work, we present Fictitious Copy Quantum Error Mitigation (FCQEM) method which corrects quantum errors without requiring any additional quantum resources and purely relies on using classical postprocessing of a joint probability distribution to correct expectation values. The joint probability distribution can be measured ``fictitiously'' by sampling one copy of noisy quantum circuit twice, or classically squaring probabilities from simply one copy. We show that FCQEM can recover eigenvalues even if exact eigenstates are not prepared. Furthermore, our technique can benefit other noise mitigation techniques with no additional quantum resources, which is demonstrated by combining FCQEM with the Quantum Computed Moments (QCM) method. FCQEM can compensate for noise that is pathological to QCM, and QCM allows for FCQEM to recover the ground state energy with a larger variety of trial states. We show that our technique can find the exact ground state energy of molecular and spin models under simulated noise models as well as experiments on a Rigetti 84-qubit superconducting quantum processor. The reported FCQEM method is general purpose for the current generation of quantum devices and is applicable to any problem that measures eigenvalues of operators on sharply peaked distributions.